On Mar 11, 2015, at 2:00 AM, Paul Vixie p...@redbarn.org wrote:
djb doesn't want QTYPE=ANY deprecated in any form.
olafur doesn't want to do_ANY, under any conditions.
so i'm baffled by why you're offering this alternative?
Neither djb nor Olafur are automatically the consensus of this WG.
tl;dr:
I am thinking of the principle of least surprise, for the use case of
interactive dig users.
Here's why:
Asking ANY to a recursive resolver, the expected behavior is whatever is
in the cache (which could be a subset of the real RRsets, and possibly
empty even though RRs exist on
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 07:12:55AM -0700, Paul Hoffman wrote:
On Mar 11, 2015, at 2:00 AM, Paul Vixie p...@redbarn.org wrote:
djb doesn't want QTYPE=ANY deprecated in any form.
olafur doesn't want to do_ANY, under any conditions.
so i'm baffled by why you're offering this alternative?
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 08:13:04PM -0700, Brian Dickson wrote:
Okay, thinking about this a bit more...
Recursive vs authoritative, RD=0 vs RD=1.
In all combinations of the above, do the new thing, except for one corner
case:
if(RD==1 I_AM_AUTHORITY) then
do_ANY
(Which happens to be
Brian Dickson mailto:brian.peter.dick...@gmail.com
Wednesday, March 11, 2015 11:13 AM
On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Brian Dickson
brian.peter.dick...@gmail.com mailto:brian.peter.dick...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hey, everyone,
[snip]
dig-friendly.
Okay, thinking about this a bit
In message 20150311162220.ga18...@puck.nether.net, Jared Mauch writes:
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 07:12:55AM -0700, Paul Hoffman wrote:
On Mar 11, 2015, at 2:00 AM, Paul Vixie p...@redbarn.org wrote:
djb doesn't want QTYPE=ANY deprecated in any form.
olafur doesn't want to do_ANY, under
On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Brian Dickson brian.peter.dick...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hey, everyone,
[snip]
dig-friendly.
Okay, thinking about this a bit more...
Recursive vs authoritative, RD=0 vs RD=1.
In all combinations of the above, do the new thing, except for one corner
case:
if(RD==1
