On Tue, 8 Jun 2010, bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com wrote:
>
> If there was any consistancy here, ISC should have created the zone
>
> 255.in-addr.arpa. or the 255/8 netblock
My setup has null zones for all /8s in classes D and E ...
Tony.
--
f.anthony.n.finchhttp://dotat.at/
FITZROY SOLE: W
In message <20100608052610.ga31...@vacation.karoshi.com.>, bmann...@vacation.ka
roshi.com writes:
> On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 02:52:01PM +1000, Mark Andrews wrote:
> >
> > The zones are consistant with RFC5735 and with operational practice.
> >
> > > So the question - how common do we expect /32
On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 02:52:01PM +1000, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> The zones are consistant with RFC5735 and with operational practice.
>
> > So the question - how common do we expect /32 delegations to become in
> > futur
> > e?
>
> From IN-ADDR.ARPA or from some other zone to handle /25-/32 s
In message <20100608041158.ga30...@vacation.karoshi.com.>, bmann...@vacation.ka
roshi.com writes:
> So ISC has allowed BIND to build with some default zones being created. I th
> ink this
> is - to coin a phrase - suboptimal and yet more code I have to rip out of the
> BIND distro...
> but that
So ISC has allowed BIND to build with some default zones being created. I
think this
is - to coin a phrase - suboptimal and yet more code I have to rip out of the
BIND distro...
but that is not the point of this missive... :)
I will use two of the automatically created zones to illistrate a p
