Re: [DNSOP] Barry Leiba's Abstain on draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00: (with COMMENT)

2015-08-31 Thread Andrew Sullivan
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 08:15:26PM +0100, Stephen Farrell wrote: > > Do ICANN have any process for allocating special-use names that will > not be used in the DNS? I am not aware of such but it may exist. It seems to me that ICANN could well decide that certain names are just not going to be dele

Re: [DNSOP] Barry Leiba's Abstain on draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00: (with COMMENT)

2015-08-22 Thread joel jaeggli
On 8/21/15 7:28 PM, Barry Leiba wrote: >> valid point, however with respect to 6761 the onion namespace >> substantially predates the existence of 6761 or the consensus documented >> there so I don't think the what if scenario is particularly helpful > > Indeed, and Stephen pointed that out to me

Re: [DNSOP] Barry Leiba's Abstain on draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00: (with COMMENT)

2015-08-22 Thread Patrik Fältström
On 21 Aug 2015, at 21:15, Stephen Farrell wrote: > Do ICANN have any process for allocating special-use names that will > not be used in the DNS? ICANN today do not have any process for doing anything regarding anything in the domain namespace except managing the strings that where applied for i

Re: [DNSOP] Barry Leiba's Abstain on draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00: (with COMMENT)

2015-08-21 Thread Barry Leiba
> valid point, however with respect to 6761 the onion namespace > substantially predates the existence of 6761 or the consensus documented > there so I don't think the what if scenario is particularly helpful Indeed, and Stephen pointed that out to me privately as well. That was a mistake in my r

Re: [DNSOP] Barry Leiba's Abstain on draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00: (with COMMENT)

2015-08-21 Thread joel jaeggli
On 8/21/15 2:40 PM, Barry Leiba wrote: >> I'm pretty sure I'll be a yes ballot on this (after I re-read the >> draft which I've not read for quite a while). And I don't expect >> either of us to change our ballot, but that said, I hope you don't >> mind explaining your ballot a little more since I'

Re: [DNSOP] Barry Leiba's Abstain on draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00: (with COMMENT)

2015-08-21 Thread Barry Leiba
> I'm pretty sure I'll be a yes ballot on this (after I re-read the > draft which I've not read for quite a while). And I don't expect > either of us to change our ballot, but that said, I hope you don't > mind explaining your ballot a little more since I'm not getting part > of your argument and t

Re: [DNSOP] Barry Leiba's Abstain on draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00: (with COMMENT)

2015-08-21 Thread Stephen Farrell
Hiya, I'm pretty sure I'll be a yes ballot on this (after I re-read the draft which I've not read for quite a while). And I don't expect either of us to change our ballot, but that said, I hope you don't mind explaining your ballot a little more since I'm not getting part of your argument and tha

[DNSOP] Barry Leiba's Abstain on draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00: (with COMMENT)

2015-08-21 Thread Barry Leiba
Barry Leiba has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00: Abstain When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https:/