You're welcome, and thanks for accepting the suggestion.
Scott
> -Original Message-
> From: Linda Dunbar
> Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2020 6:54 PM
> To: Hollenbeck, Scott
> Cc: dnsop@ietf.org; rt...@ietf.org
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: DNS for Cloud Resources in draft-ietf-rtgwg-
> net2cl
Scott,
Here is the revised version with your suggested changes incorporated:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-net2cloud-problem-statement/
Thank you very much for the review and suggestion.
Linda Dunbar
-Original Message-
From: Linda Dunbar
Sent: Monday, March 16, 2
Scott,
Thank you very much for the suggestion. Have changed the text per your
suggestion. Will upload the new version when the IETF submission opens up next
Monday.
Linda
-Original Message-
From: Hollenbeck, Scott
Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2020 1:19 PM
To: Linda Dunbar
Cc: dnsop@
On 3/11/2020 2:19 PM, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote:
(Sorry, this is a late response to a review request original sent to the dnsop
list on 11 February)
Section 3.4 (DNS for Cloud Resources) includes these sentences:
"Globally unique names do prevent any possibility of collision at the present or in
Cloud Resources in
draft-ietf-rtgwg-net2cloud-problem-statement-08
Could we make the last sentence stronger, perhaps with a statement like this
from the US CERT WPAD Name Collision Vulnerability alert dated May 23, 2016?
"Globally unique names do prevent any possibility of collision a
(Sorry, this is a late response to a review request original sent to the dnsop
list on 11 February)
Section 3.4 (DNS for Cloud Resources) includes these sentences:
"Globally unique names do prevent any possibility of collision at the present
or in the future and they make DNSSEC trust manageabl
