[DNSOP] Re: draft-ietf-dnsop-avoid-fragmentation-17.txt - implementer notes

2024-06-06 Thread Benno Overeinder
Hi all, Speaking as one of the DNS implementers and as part of providing feedback on the current draft revision, we have reformulated recommendation R2. It expresses the intention not to fragment UDP packets and points out that different operating systems have different ways of achieving thi

[DNSOP]Re: draft-ietf-dnsop-avoid-fragmentation-17.txt - implementer notes

2024-05-21 Thread Paul Wouters
On Mon, 6 May 2024, Petr Špaček wrote: R1. UDP responders SHOULD NOT use IPv6 fragmentation [RFC8200]. Operational impact of this recommendation is unclear. Why? Because clients belong to several sets: - One set clients cannot receive fragmented answers, Good because it has been proven to

[DNSOP]Re: draft-ietf-dnsop-avoid-fragmentation-17.txt - implementer notes

2024-05-07 Thread Petr Špaček
On 07. 05. 24 2:54, C. M. Heard wrote: On Mon, May 6, 2024 at 6:59 AM Petr Špaček wrote: Warren asked implementers to provide feedback on the current text, so I'm doing just that. [ ... ] 3.1. Recommendations for UDP responders R1. UDP responders SHOULD NOT use IPv6 fragmentation [RFC8200

[DNSOP]Re: draft-ietf-dnsop-avoid-fragmentation-17.txt - implementer notes

2024-05-06 Thread C. M. Heard
Greetings, I am replying from the POV of an outsider to DNSOP. On Mon, May 6, 2024 at 6:59 AM Petr Špaček wrote: > > Hello dnsop, > > Warren asked implementers to provide feedback on the current text, so > I'm doing just that. [ ... ] > > 3.1. Recommendations for UDP responders > > > > R1. UDP