; Paul Vixie
; dnsop@ietf.org; Paul Ebersman ;
RTGWG
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Solicit feedback on the problems of DNS for Cloud
Resources described by the draft-ietf-rtgwg-net2cloud-problem-statement
Ah. Should have used the Oxford comma for clarity. I'm normally one of the
people who always us
olve the
> same globally for all queries from any source.*
>
>
>
> Thank you,
>
>
>
> Linda
>
> *From:* Morizot Timothy S
> *Sent:* Thursday, February 13, 2020 6:23 AM
> *To:* Linda Dunbar ; Paul Vixie <
> p...@redbarn.org>; dnsop@ietf.org; Paul Ebersm
ank you,
Linda
From: Morizot Timothy S
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2020 6:23 AM
To: Linda Dunbar ; Paul Vixie ;
dnsop@ietf.org; Paul Ebersman
Cc: RTGWG
Subject: RE: [DNSOP] Solicit feedback on the problems of DNS for Cloud
Resources described by the draft-ietf-rtgwg-net2cloud-problem-statemen
Linda Dunbar wrote:
>Thank you very much for suggesting using the Globally unique domain name and
>having subdomains not resolvable outside the organization.
>I took some of your wording into the section. Please let us know if the
>description can be improved.
Thanks. I think that covers a reaso
On Wednesday, 12 February 2020 22:43:07 UTC Linda Dunbar wrote:
> Paul,
>
> ...
>
> This document is meant to describe potential problems of utilizing Cloud
> Resources. It is a good idea to document the potential collisions and
> conflicts and recommend Globally unique names. How about adding th
ersman
Cc: Linda Dunbar
Subject: RE: [DNSOP] Solicit feedback on the problems of DNS for Cloud
Resources described by the draft-ietf-rtgwg-net2cloud-problem-statement
Paul Vixie wrote:
>if the names are global then they will be unique and DNS itself will
>handle the decision of how
nt: Tuesday, February 11, 2020 9:01 PM
To: dnsop@ietf.org; Paul Ebersman
Cc: Linda Dunbar
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Solicit feedback on the problems of DNS for Cloud
Resources described by the draft-ietf-rtgwg-net2cloud-problem-statement
On Tuesday, 11 February 2020 22:21:05 UTC Linda Dunba
tmorizot> I would also like to understand why global and unique names
tmorizot> are unacceptable.
Why do folks insist on NAT and RFC 1918? or ULA v6?
There is a common feeling that it's another layer of security. I
personally am not a fan of it but I think this is probably the most
critica
Paul Vixie wrote:
>if the names are global then they will be unique and DNS itself will handle
>the decision of how to route questions to the right authority servers.
>...
>first i hope you can explain why the simpler and existing viral DNS paradigm
>(all names are global and unique) is unaccepta
On Tuesday, 11 February 2020 22:21:05 UTC Linda Dunbar wrote:
> ...
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-net2cloud-problem-statement/
>
> During IETF 106, we received comments that the document should cover the
> problems associated with DNS service by different Cloud Operators f
Many thanks to Paul Ebersman and Suzanne Woolf discussion during NANOG about
the deep intricate issues around DNS and learned that DNSOP is the right group
to solicit feedback about DNS issues for utilizing hybrid Clouds.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-net2cloud-problem-state
11 matches
Mail list logo
