-Original Message-
From: dnsop-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:dnsop-boun...@ietf.org]
On Behalf Of Andrew Sullivan
Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2009 12:13 PM
To: dnsop@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Stockholm meeting slot assignment CHANGED
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 02:37:09PM -0400, John
On Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 02:11:45AM +0200, Peter Koch wrote:
On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 09:34:58AM +0200, Matthijs Mekking wrote:
According to the behave ML, they are planning to cover that DNS topic
indeed on the monday:
thanks for pointing this out, it's indeed an important overlap. We're
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 02:37:09PM -0400, John Schnizlein wrote:
Now, what about this other draft that seems to call for recursive
resolvers to know about address translation?
http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-vogt-durand-virtual-ip6-connectivity-01.txt
Clearly, it needs review ;-) Note that
On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 09:34:58AM +0200, Matthijs Mekking wrote:
According to the behave ML, they are planning to cover that DNS topic
indeed on the monday:
thanks for pointing this out, it's indeed an important overlap. We're
coordinating with the behave chairs to get this resolved, which
Dear WG,
the DNSOP WG meeting in Stockholm has been moved from Friday morning to
Monday morning, 0900-1130 (// apparea, behave, mip4, mpls, pcn, syslog, xmpp).
Please let Rob/$me know whether this generates a serious conflict, so we
can at least try to get the meeting re-rescheduled.
The agenda
In message 20090707185515.gf32...@unknown.office.denic.de, Peter Koch writes:
Dear WG,
the DNSOP WG meeting in Stockholm has been moved from Friday morning to
Monday morning, 0900-1130 (// apparea, behave, mip4, mpls, pcn, syslog, xmpp)
.
Please let Rob/$me know whether this generates a