On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 8:12 PM, Matthew Pounsett wrote:
>
>
> On 2 April 2018 at 09:56, Warren Kumari wrote:
>>
>>
>> This is not clearly a modification to the intended consensus (yet),
>> and currently feels unclear to me, so I'm going to give this another
>> few days (~1 week) and then, probabl
On 2 April 2018 at 09:56, Warren Kumari wrote:
>
> This is not clearly a modification to the intended consensus (yet),
> and currently feels unclear to me, so I'm going to give this another
> few days (~1 week) and then, probably, mark it Hold for Document
> Update. I'd still appreciate peoples'
On Sun, Apr 1, 2018 at 5:06 PM, Evan Hunt wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 01, 2018 at 01:33:17PM -0400, Warren Kumari wrote:
>> I'm also somewhat confused what the caching the wildcard answer
>> *means* - if I have *.example.com cached and then get a query for
>> foo.example.com I still need to query for it
On Sun, Apr 01, 2018 at 11:58:07PM +0530, Mukund Sivaraman wrote:
> Caching takes place not just by BIND, but Unbound as well and does not
> cause problems, so the stronger requirement is unnecessary and ought to
> be re-worded.
PowerDNS recursor will also happily cache a *.record but not do anyth
On Sun, Apr 01, 2018 at 01:33:17PM -0400, Warren Kumari wrote:
> I'm also somewhat confused what the caching the wildcard answer
> *means* - if I have *.example.com cached and then get a query for
> foo.example.com I still need to query for it (note that this is all
> before DNSSEC / Aggressive NSE
On Sun, Apr 01, 2018 at 01:33:17PM -0400, Warren Kumari wrote:
> Can folk help me understand what should happen with this errata?
> W
To elaborate further:
IMO there's no argument against caching if the cached record set (with
wildcard owner name) was not used in synthesis of RRs. I suspect RFC
1
Hi all,
We have this errata:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/verify_errata_select.php?eid=5316
The document as published says:
"A * label appearing in a query name has no special effect, but can be
used to test for wildcards in an authoritative zone; such a query is the
only way to get a response con
