Hi kc,
On 17/07/2023 21:41, k claffy wrote:
I agree it would greatly help to include the more precise terms.
Note that Scott's current EPP draft is still using this term,
citing the definition in 1912. Should the term be removed from
Scott's draft, or acknowledged that it is now historic?
If
Dear WG,
Thank you for your thoughtful feedback during the WGLC for the revised
lame delegation definition. With this email, we close the WGLC for
rfc8499bis.
With the discussion and feedback during the interim and with the WGLC on
the mailing list, the chairs have determined there is rough
>> Note that Scott's current EPP draft is still using this term,
>> citing the definition in 1912. Should the term be removed
>> from Scott's draft, or acknowledged that it is now historic?
>> If Scott replaces it with another more precise term, can we
>> get that term in this document so that fut
> With the DNSOP interim meeting last June, we reworded the definition
> of "lame delegation". This new definition of "lame delegation" has
> been shared on the mailing list and included by the document authors
> in the latest revision of the rfc8499bis draft,
> https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddif
> -Original Message-
> From: DNSOP On Behalf Of k claffy
> Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2023 12:41 AM
> To: George Michaelson
> Cc: Benno Overeinder ; DNSOP Working Group
> ; DNSOP Chairs
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [DNSOP] WGLC rfc8499bis for revised lame
> delegatio
I agree it would greatly help to include the more precise terms.
Note that Scott's current EPP draft is still using this term,
citing the definition in 1912. Should the term be removed from
Scott's draft, or acknowledged that it is now historic?
If Scott replaces it with another more precise
To the definition and future use of lame, I think this is reasonable editorial.
I think the draft could use some linkage to the "better terms" so it's
clear what terms are now held to refer to what we formerly called
"lame" -But that would be connective, not substantive to the
definition of what l
Dear WG,
With the DNSOP interim meeting last June, we reworded the definition of
"lame delegation". This new definition of "lame delegation" has been
shared on the mailing list and included by the document authors in the
latest revision of the rfc8499bis draft,
https://author-tools.ietf.org/
