Re: [DNSOP]  Working Group Last Call draft-ietf-dnsop-resolver-priming

On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 08:03:35PM -0400, Tim Wicinski wrote a message of 27 lines which said: > This starts a Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-resolver-priming I know, it's too late (damned holidays) but I think the document is OK, I just suggest a few

Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call draft-ietf-dnsop-resolver-priming

At Fri, 19 Aug 2016 16:31:18 -0700, "Paul Hoffman" wrote: > > - Section 2 > > > >Therefore, it is important that resolvers be able to cope with > >change, even without relying upon configuration updates to be > > applied > >by their operator. > > > > If we

Re: [DNSOP]  Working Group Last Call draft-ietf-dnsop-resolver-priming

On 8/4/16, 20:03, "DNSOP on behalf of Tim Wicinski" wrote: >Remember the Resolver Priming draft? Comments on the draft (https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-dnsop-resolver-priming-07.txt): ## 3.3. DNSSEC with Priming Queries ## ##

Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call draft-ietf-dnsop-resolver-priming

On 17 Aug 2016, at 9:45, 神明達哉 wrote: I've read draft-ietf-dnsop-resolver-priming-07. I think this is a useful document and is almost ready for publication. Thanks for the careful review. But there seem to be a few non-trivial issues that may need to be addressed. Specific comments: -

Re: [DNSOP]  Working Group Last Call draft-ietf-dnsop-resolver-priming

All The WGLC last call for resolver-priming has concluded. There was a solid number of good reviews, and no reasons to not publish this. I want to thank everyone who gave reviews and feedback. I'm going to go over the list with the author(s) and make sure everything was covered. thanks

Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call draft-ietf-dnsop-resolver-priming

On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 12:45 PM, 神明達哉 wrote: > At Thu, 4 Aug 2016 20:03:35 -0400, > Tim Wicinski wrote: > > > This starts a Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-resolver- > priming > > > > Current versions of the draft is available here: > >

Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call draft-ietf-dnsop-resolver-priming

At Sat, 13 Aug 2016 14:01:52 +0300, Andreas Gustafsson wrote: > There is nothing wrong with existing resolvers that use the same > timeout and retransmission strategies for priming queries as for any > other query, and it seems wrong to me that a specific retransmission >

Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call draft-ietf-dnsop-resolver-priming

On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 4:27 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote: > On 5 Aug 2016, at 2:45, Shane Kerr wrote: > >> First, we have: >> >> "If a priming query does not get a response within 2 seconds, the >> recursive resolver SHOULD retry with a different target address from >> the

Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call draft-ietf-dnsop-resolver-priming

On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 6:27 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote: > On 5 Aug 2016, at 2:45, Shane Kerr wrote: > >> First, we have: >> >> "If a priming query does not get a response within 2 seconds, the >> recursive resolver SHOULD retry with a different target address from >> the

Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call draft-ietf-dnsop-resolver-priming

On 5 Aug 2016, at 2:45, Shane Kerr wrote: First, we have: "If a priming query does not get a response within 2 seconds, the recursive resolver SHOULD retry with a different target address from the configuration." The "2 seconds" seems a bit arbitrary. I'm not sure why any

Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call draft-ietf-dnsop-resolver-priming

On Wednesday, Paul Hoffman wrote: > > The "2 seconds" seems a bit arbitrary. > > Yep. But... > > > I'm not sure why any > > recommendations need to be made at all. The document already says that > > these are basically normal DNS queries elsewhere - surely that is > > enough? > > The queries

Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call draft-ietf-dnsop-resolver-priming

On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 8:38 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote: > On 5 Aug 2016, at 2:45, Shane Kerr wrote: > > All, >> >> At 2016-08-04 20:03:35 -0400 >> Tim Wicinski wrote: >> >> Remember the Resolver Priming draft? This thing has been kicking around >>> for a

Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call draft-ietf-dnsop-resolver-priming

re the 2 second timeout. perhaps timeout does not express the intent well. I think of most of the DNS timeout options to be effectively hold-down timers - to be used to prevent excessive "chatty" behaviours. /W On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 2:45 AM, Shane Kerr wrote: >

Re: [DNSOP]  Working Group Last Call draft-ietf-dnsop-resolver-priming

All, At 2016-08-04 20:03:35 -0400 Tim Wicinski wrote: > Remember the Resolver Priming draft? This thing has been kicking around > for a good solid 5 years. It stalled for a few years waiting for the > busy authors perform some updates. > Then Paul Hoffman took the reins

[DNSOP]  Working Group Last Call draft-ietf-dnsop-resolver-priming

All Remember the Resolver Priming draft? This thing has been kicking around for a good solid 5 years. It stalled for a few years waiting for the busy authors perform some updates. Then Paul Hoffman took the reins and has done a great job getting this ready for publication. This starts a