Stephane,
I think it depends. I seem to remember that there was discussion that
the WG put an "Experimental" on the draft, which means it could pass
through quickly and then be revised when there has been some
implementations and feedback. I'm open for opinions.
tim
On 6/5/15 7:50 AM, St
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 10:51 AM Stephane Bortzmeyer
wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 12:51:21AM +,
> Warren Kumari wrote
> a message of 205 lines which said:
>
> > ... speaking of WGLC, what is the status of this?
> >
> > The recent set of changes and comments all look minor - did I miss
>
On Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 12:51:21AM +,
Warren Kumari wrote
a message of 205 lines which said:
> ... speaking of WGLC, what is the status of this?
>
> The recent set of changes and comments all look minor - did I miss
> anything, or does this look close to cooked?
There have been very good
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 12:05 PM Stephane Bortzmeyer
wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 12:35:29AM -0400,
> Shumon Huque wrote
> a message of 400 lines which said:
>
> > Are we standardizing on the british spelling of "minimisation" in
> > preference to the americanized "minimization"?
>
> Bikes
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 7:14 AM, Niall O'Reilly
wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Mar 2015 16:50:07 +,
> Paul Hoffman wrote:
> >
> > >> I'd prefer the simpler "The problem statement is described in ..".
> > >> The term "exposed" in my mind carries a more sensational connotation,
> > >> but I might be nitpi
On Wed, 11 Mar 2015 16:50:07 +,
Paul Hoffman wrote:
>
> >> I'd prefer the simpler "The problem statement is described in ..".
> >> The term "exposed" in my mind carries a more sensational connotation,
> >> but I might be nitpicking.
> >
> > Advice from english writers here?
>
> +1 to Shumon:
On Mar 11, 2015, at 9:02 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 12:35:29AM -0400,
> Shumon Huque wrote
> a message of 400 lines which said:
>
>> Are we standardizing on the british spelling of "minimisation" in
>> preference to the americanized "minimization"?
>
> Bikeshed
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 12:35:29AM -0400,
Shumon Huque wrote
a message of 400 lines which said:
> Are we standardizing on the british spelling of "minimisation" in
> preference to the americanized "minimization"?
Bikeshedding is postponed until Working Group Last Call :-)
> I'd prefer the si
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 12:35 AM, Shumon Huque wrote:
> ...
>
> One thing this document doesn't make clear is that the algorithm
> being presented not only minimizes the query name, but also hides
> the query type until it reaches the target zone (by using the NS
> query type rather than the actu
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 12:50 PM, Paul Hoffman
wrote:
> On Mar 11, 2015, at 9:02 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 12:35:29AM -0400,
> > Shumon Huque wrote
> > a message of 400 lines which said:
> >
> >> Are we standardizing on the british spelling of "minimisatio
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 12:02 PM, Stephane Bortzmeyer
wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 12:35:29AM -0400,
> Shumon Huque wrote
> a message of 400 lines which said:
>
> > > Under current practice, when a resolver receives the query
> > >"What is the record for www.example.com?", it send
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 10:43 AM, Bob Harold wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 12:35 AM, Shumon Huque wrote:
>
>> ...
>>
>> One thing this document doesn't make clear is that the algorithm
>> being presented not only minimizes the query name, but also hides
>> the query type until it reaches th
Hi Stephane,
Some comments on this draft:
> DNS query name minimisation to improve privacy
> draft-ietf-dnsop-qname-minimisation-02
>
> Abstract
>
>This document describes one of the techniques that could be used to
>improve DNS privacy (see [[17]I-D.ietf-dpr
13 matches
Mail list logo
