On Mon, 27 Jun 2022, John Levine wrote:
spec, it would take a long time for the changes to percolate out into
the field. There is still plenty of software using TLS 1.1 which was
published in 2006 and deprecated a year ago.
That does not apply to tor nodes though. These are forced to have
It appears that Peter Thomassen said:
>
>
>On 6/27/22 22:05, John Levine wrote:
>> But there is a
>> great deal of software that expects the names it uses to look like
>> hostnames, and won't work with anything else.
>
>The software for new applications which would use a _foo pseudo-TLD
On Jun 27, 2022, at 16:34, Michael StJohns wrote:
>
> It was true once! :-) That's why I said "I think" - too many twiddles to
> the DNS to keep tract of.
As of IETF 101, these twiddles are now called “humps”
Paul
___
DNSOP mailing list
On 6/27/22 22:05, John Levine wrote:
But there is a
great deal of software that expects the names it uses to look like
hostnames, and won't work with anything else.
The software for new applications which would use a _foo pseudo-TLD namespace is not yet written.
It is for future
On 6/27/2022 4:31 PM, John Levine wrote:
It appears that Michael StJohns said:
I suggest that reserving "_*" names is redundant as (I *think* - I
didn't go looking for the reference?) strings beginning with an
underscore can only be used in left-most components of a DNS name.
Dunno where you
It appears that Michael StJohns said:
>I suggest that reserving "_*" names is redundant as (I *think* - I
>didn't go looking for the reference?) strings beginning with an
>underscore can only be used in left-most components of a DNS name.
Dunno where you heard that, but it's completely not
On 6/27/2022 4:05 PM, John Levine wrote:
It appears that Peter Thomassen said:
I am proposing to reserve all top-level underscore labels (_*) for special use.
Why?
While I don't think that reserving underscore names will break anything that is
not already broken, I also don't see what
It appears that Peter Thomassen said:
>I am proposing to reserve all top-level underscore labels (_*) for special
>use. Why?
While I don't think that reserving underscore names will break anything that is
not already broken, I also don't see what problem it solves.
Everything you say about
