when I use openjade with DocBook 4.1, I get errors like the following:
openjade:/sw/share/sgml/dtd/docbook/4.1/dbpool.mod:415:23:Q: length of interpreted
parameter literal must not exceed LITLEN (1024)
openjade:/sw/share/sgml/dtd/docbook/4.1/dbpool.mod:631:24:Q: length of interpreted
parameter
On Fri, 16 Nov 2001, Jirka Kosek wrote:
I know how to do it in XSL. In DSSSL you must probably use
something like (I grabbed it from Norm's DSSSL stylesheets):
(make entitity
system-id: equations.txt
(... code to generate file ...)
)
If you proceed this way, I can add
/ Sasha Zucker [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to say:
| I have figured out that if I include docbook.dcl as an argument of
| openjade, I won't get the errors. But why isn't adding SGMLDECL
| docbook.dcl to docbook.cat getting rid of these errors?
Is there another SGMLDECL before or after that one?
Ok,
So the fact that a few things changed at the last minute has put us in
a bit of a bind FO-wise. As things currently stand, tools that expect
the last call draft work fine, but RenderX and presumably other, newer
tools do not.
If I change the stylesheets so that they match the FO REC,
/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to say:
| Norman Walsh writes:
| If I change the stylesheets so that they match the FO REC, RenderX and
| newer tools will work, but older tools (PassiveTeX and FOP) will not.
|
| Is anyone here familiar enough with FOP development to suggest when
| they
Hi,
(My apologies if this has been asked before.)
I've got DocBook putting footnotes at the bottom of pages successfully,
but for some reason the line-spacing is huge. How can I set the line
spacing to some normal value?
Regards,
--
roryh
/ Dave Pawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to say:
| Guilty. I put the proposal for the change to the WG.
| I found the previous referencing system totally confusing,
| using the same attribute name for two purposes.
| Apparently they accepted it.
Yep. And you were absolutely right.
