Matt,
I'm using OpenJade 1.3 and dsssl stylesheets 1.74b...
I know that DSSSL is pretty dead, but OpenJade is the only tool
that allows me to generate HTML as well as postscript.
Of course, it would be better to have XML catalogs and use XSL
stylesheets, but until now I haven't found a tool
On Mon, 2002-01-14 at 07:13, Matt G. wrote:
rant
Unfortunately, the OpenJade maintainers seem to be completely neglecting it.
Tsk. openjade 1.3.1 will be released shortly.
I don't care about new features, but one might expect they'd at least do a
maintenance release including
On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 08:57:44PM +0100, Alexander Schatten wrote:
This complete framework is SO complex to setup, I have never seen
something like this before, especially when there is no documentation
that explains the necessary steps in one document. currently I feel like
playing a
On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 06:01:10PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Having now taken a file from
XML -- HTML via xsltproc
from
XML -- .fo via xsltproc
from
.fo -- .fop via xsltproc
and downloaded the fop.sh I try to run
fop.sh from the command line (CYGWIN),
and am told:
[: Doc:
--gV1yUYniiDLxW66s
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 09:11:01PM -0800, Carlos Araya wrote:
A couple days ago I asked about an RPM for Passivetex and even then
I'm having a hell of time trying to find if I have the correct
versions
On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 06:46:28AM +, Matt G. wrote:
I guess it would be helpful if there was an application for
XML/Docbook where you'd have all the allowed tags offered to you,
either in a menu or in an XML comment tag or something like that.
That's what I mean by a good, DTD-aware
rant
Unfortunately, the OpenJade maintainers seem to be completely
neglecting it.
Tsk. openjade 1.3.1 will be released shortly.
My apologies. I saw no signs of recent activity, at the sourceforge site.
Furthermore, the most recent release, 1.3, had been out for over 2 years,
despite
(This is related to doxygen and to its possible future
output into DocBook XML. The message appeared in
[EMAIL PROTECTED], but now it seems to be
more related to doxygen than to DocBook. Please, join
the [EMAIL PROTECTED] if you want to
participate on doxygen development, and to follow this
On Sun, 13 Jan 2002, Carlos Araya wrote:
And you talk about the tools, well that's another bottleneck. The tools
assume a technical level that most beginers don't have (even if they've
worked installing software before.) A couple days ago I asked about an RPM
for Passivetex and even then I'm
In the HTML stylesheets ver. 1.48 the templates for productnumber and
productname in mode 'titlepage.mode' both unconditionally output a br/
element.
This doesn't look right for me, but I - being a European - might be
unaware of some american conventions.
Is it a bug? If so, I will submit at
Matt G. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I use an XSLT script to output the PCDATA of all the elements I care
to spell check, then feed this through ispell. The problem with this
approach is that I have to manually integrate the corrected spellings
back into the source document. It would be nice
Michael Charles Smith wrote:
I'm very new to docbook, and I'm trying to get it set up. Right now we
have the xml version of the dtd, and I was trying to use jade to process
it. When I ran nsgmls -sv test.doc(the command it gives to test your
setup of docbook in TDG, I got a whole bunch
--98e8jtXdkpgskNou
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 10:01:10AM +, Matt G. wrote:
rant
Unfortunately, the OpenJade maintainers seem to be completely
neglecting it.
Tsk. openjade 1.3.1 will be released shortly.
What
Michael Charles Smith wrote:
I'm very new to docbook, and I'm trying to get it set up. Right now we
have the xml version of the dtd, and I was trying to use jade to process
it. When I ran nsgmls -sv test.doc(the command it gives to test your
setup of docbook in TDG, I got a whole bunch of
--V88s5gaDVPzZ0KCq
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
I'm working on a publication using docbook. We have a lot of additional
notes that I'd like to reference from within the book, but am unsure as
to what the best way to mark them up is.
Here's a fragment
Josef Karthauser wrote:
On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 10:01:10AM +, Matt G. wrote:
rant
Unfortunately, the OpenJade maintainers seem to be completely
neglecting it.
Tsk. openjade 1.3.1 will be released shortly.
What does openjade offer over jade? I tried to answer this
First of all, I beg you pardon if this turns out to be a very trivial
question.
This is what I'm working with:
- Xalan Version 1.2.2, XML4J Version Xerces 1.2.2
- DocBook XSL stylesheet version = 1.41
My DocBook documents can be transformed without problem with version
1.41 of the stylesheets,
--sdtB3X0nJg68CQEu
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 07:04:17AM -0800, Carlos Araya wrote:
Openjade is still being maintained and improved. I don't think J Clark is
maintaining Jade anymore. If there's any evolution in the Jade
On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 03:35:24PM +, Josef Karthauser wrote:
I'm using jade at the moment, but wondering whether it's worth moving to
openjade. What I'd really like to get working is texual flow about
figures and sidebars. That doesn't appear to work in jade.
I don't think this is
On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 04:42:02PM +0100, Yann Dirson wrote:
On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 03:35:24PM +, Josef Karthauser wrote:
I'm using jade at the moment, but wondering whether it's worth moving to
openjade. What I'd really like to get working is texual flow about
figures and sidebars.
Bob Stayton wrote:
On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 08:57:44PM +0100, Alexander Schatten wrote:
This complete framework is SO complex to setup, I have never seen
something like this before, especially when there is no documentation
that explains the necessary steps in one document. currently I feel
i.e: put the xml.dcl before your xml file when running nsgml or jade.
Juan R. Migoya
SPAIN
E.L. Willighagen wrote:
Michael Charles Smith wrote:
I'm very new to docbook, and I'm trying to get it set up. Right now we
have the xml version of the dtd, and I was trying to use jade to
First of all, I beg you pardon if this turns out to be a very trivial
question.
This is what I'm working with:
- Xalan Version 1.2.2, XML4J Version Xerces 1.2.2
- DocBook XSL stylesheet version = 1.41
My DocBook documents can be transformed without problem with version
1.41 of the
On Mon, 2002-01-14 at 15:35, Josef Karthauser wrote:
On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 07:04:17AM -0800, Carlos Araya wrote:
Openjade is still being maintained and improved. I don't think J Clark is
maintaining Jade anymore. If there's any evolution in the Jade software
family it'll be in Openjade
On 01/14/02 8:02, Alexander Schatten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
well, I do understand this. however: unfortunately it seems to me the
same like in other (open source) projects: microsoft was once blamed for
their setup program: only dummies would use this, bla bla. now even
linux software
At 23:49 13/01/2002 -0800, Bob Stayton wrote:
On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 06:02:41AM +, Dave Pawson wrote:
In the output I see
fo:block space-before.minimum=0.8em space-before.optimum=1em
space-before.maximum=1.2em font-family=Courier font-size=9pt
wrap-option=no-wrap text-align=start
(This was about letting URLs hyphenate in DocBook FO output (e.g. PDF with
Fop). Should work anywhere.)
le 13/01/02 18:57, David Cramer écrivit:
Julien,
If you figure out the first one, let me know. The thread
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/XSL-FO/messagesearch?query=forcing%20line%
20breaks
Julien Letessier wrote:
le 14/01/02 17:02, Alexander Schatten écrivit:
the same here and in other similar projects: what I feel angry about is,
that many of these projects suffer on two things:
-- setup and installation
-- documentation
(snip)
It's in the works... I've created a
first, the usual information:
FreeBSD 4.3-RELEASE
OpenJade 1.3
DocBook XML 4.1.2
nwalsh docbook-dsssl-1.71
$ jadetex -v -- Here's what version of jadetex I'm using
TeX (Web2C 7.3.1) 3.14159
kpathsea version 3.3.1
I am having what appears to be a common problem. I am trying to generate a PDF
Matt,
If you want the benefits of DocBook with as little hassle as possible, then
get a good, DTD-aware XML editor. My suggestion is then to download the
HTML copy of _DocBook: The Definitive Guide_ (get it from docbook.org), and
keep it open in a browser. In my opinion, working that way is
Sasha Zucker writes:
I am having what appears to be a common problem. I am trying to generate a PDF
version of a book with a preface and I am not getting roman numerals. Worse
yet, the page numbering restarts at one in chapter two, so I am getting three
page 1s in the book (title page,
Did you have a look at:
http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/hoenicka_markus/ntsgml.html
This little document guides you through the setup of an SGML and XML
editing and processing system. DocBook (both SGML and XML) is used as
the main DTD example. The instructions include Emacs, PSGML,
At 21:11 14/01/2002 +0100, Alexander Schatten wrote:
the meaning is this: off course: provide current updates off all
subprojects for the specialists. but PLEASE provide ONE solution, that
does is all for the normal user. this one must not be updated that often
and also needs not to support
From: Jorge Godoy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: DOCBOOK-APPS: Re: Abbreviated DocBook
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 08:39:56 -0200
especially since I write all my XML with vi, however I'm
convinced it's worth the effort.
Oh... That's why you suffer a little. Not starting a war, but Emacs has a
lot of
34 matches
Mail list logo
