Hi,
More details are needed. I presume ".../..." here refers to some actual path
information. Can you provide that information, as well as the actual path to
the image file?
Are you using an admon.graphics.path parameter? Normally the note element's
graphic is "note.png", not Note.gif.
MessageThe automatic glossary feature does not currently support assembling
entries from a glossary collection into glossdivs. I can see how that might be
nice, though. You could file a feature request. 8^)
Bob Stayton
Sagehill Enterprises
DocBook Consulting
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Origin
Has any one came across this issue when using glossary databases?
I have a glossary database in use in my doc set. However, it appears
that I cannot preserve the glossdiv info that is in the database.
Here is the glossary:
Fish
Carp
A dirty Fish
Trout
Mauritz,
The pros may have a better suggestion, but in the meantime, I solved this
problem by overriding the section object.title.template in my customization
layer.
The SAE Standards body has a convention that there can only be a trailing
dot for level 1, and no trailing dot elsewhere. Here's w
Each line in a TOC is generated using the template named toc.line from
html/autotoc.xsl. This line does the title:
You could add a condition after that to test="self::article" and add the
dash and a
Bob Stayton
Sagehill Enterprises
DocBook Consulting
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Me
Hi,
Is your programlisting inside a formal object such as example or figure?
If so, then the keep-together.within-page is being imposed there,
overriding the one you might add for the programlisting inside it. If so,
you could try adding the property to example.properties.
I would also sugge
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I set
>
> to have section numbering. But the numbers are like 1. or
> 2.1. or 4.3.2.
> I want to remove the last "." after the last number of the section.
See this message:
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/docbook-apps/200405/msg0
I put start in my customization
layer, and now I don't have the problem.
Is this a valid fix?
Thank you,
Joseph Caporale
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Left-aligning-%3Cglossterm%3E-instead-of-left-justifying-tf4062305.html#a11541971
Sent from the docbook apps mailing l
Hello,
I'm using this DocBook customization:
It left aligns , but it also has the side effect of completely
screwing up acronyms. It makes acronyms appear a line beneath the gloss
term and also seems to make acronym spill over to the next page without
keeping together with the rest of
Hi all,
I'm using the Simplified DocBook and the DocBook-XSL-1.72.0 for creating my
documents.
I set
to have section numbering. But the numbers are like 1. or 2.1. or 4.3.2.
I want to remove the last "." after the last number of the section.
In the DocBook-XSL-Guide:
.
But this is
10 matches
Mail list logo