me of those problems.
Propose a syntax? All the ones I thought up were too ugly to live. If
you can come up with anything better I might implement it.
--=20
http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond
--vkogqOf2sHV7VnPd
Content-Type: application/pgp-sign
Now tell me how this differs, other than in surface syntax, from what I've
already done?
Yes, I could have dressed up my conditionals this way. Still could with=20
some trivial changes to my flex program. I thought it would be more
honest to make them PIs.
--=20
http://w
e necessary parts of it).
>
> In fact, that's just what my code does, by way of an egregious hack.
So, are you planning to publish and support this?
--
http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond
msg06265/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
ersion &version;)
This is one of the reasons I'm skeptical about a pure-XML approach. If you're
going to have to process before validation, why care about the XNL
structure at all?
--
http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond
msg06263/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
input to be well-formed
> XML and guarantees that the result will be well-formed.
Good answer. Same one I anticipated several messages up-thgread :-)
So, how would *you* implement this "specialized vocabulary"? XSLT
doesn't have the marbles for it.
--=20
h
do that.
(3) You add --error-filename. Has the advantage that it could be used
with other preprocessors.
Your thoughts?
--
http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond
Daniel Veillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 06:14:59PM -0400, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
> > What would you consider a complete solution to this problem? I'm not
> > wedded to xmlif itself, I just need to get some work done that
> > requires being a
dled, and how ?
xmlif knows nothing about the XML structure of the document. All it `sees'
is the processing instructions what is otherwise, from its point of view,
a featureless byte stream.
--
http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond
Daniel Veillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 05:38:02AM -0400, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
> > xmlif knows nothing about the XML structure of the document. All it `sees'
> > is the processing instructions what is otherwise, from its point of view,
>
giginal/
> of the stderr stream doesn't sound hard to setup ...
Fine if I'm processing errors in batch mode, yes. But I mentioned Emacs
for a reason...
--
http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond
nd-lineconditionscolor='black'and
color='white'.
Here is an example:
Always issue this text.
Issue this text if 'condition=html' is given on the command line.
Issue this text if 'condition=pdf' or 'condition=ps'
is given on the command line.
Otherwise issue this text.
Always issue this text.
--
http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond
quest. Do you want
a more formal specification of the behavior of the PIs?
--
http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond
ed it.
The PI-based will get a real-world test from xmlto's users asfter the 0.11
relese.
> You claim to have the magic solution, I want to hear
> more voices before commiting on it, especially since I'm not personally
> convinced it's the right technical approach.
Magic, no. Workable, yes.
--
http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond
;ll issue an updated version of doclifter that doesn't generate
entity-set inclusions. And be glad to do it, actually -- I'll be able
to chop out two huge dictionaries and some ugly code.
--
http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond
14 matches
Mail list logo
