RE: [docbook-apps] Re: FW: long Tables in docbook using FOP

2008-02-18 Thread Mauritz Jeanson
-Original Message- From: Ron Catterall Mauritz Not appeared as yet (10:10 CST, 16:10 GMT). Do we have another delay in the build? I don't think so. It works for me. Yesterday, I downloaded snapshot revision 7680. The modified table.properties attribute-set was there in

RE: [docbook-apps] Re: FW: long Tables in docbook using FOP

2008-02-18 Thread Ron Catterall
Yes, all OK now. I must have been a bit too quick off the mark. -Original Message- From: Ron Catterall Mauritz Not appeared as yet (10:10 CST, 16:10 GMT). Do we have another delay in the build? I don't think so. It works for me. Yesterday, I downloaded snapshot revision

[docbook-apps] Re: FW: long Tables in docbook using FOP

2008-02-17 Thread Mauritz Jeanson
Brooks Moses wrote: Mauritz Jeanson wrote, at 2/13/2008 11:35 AM: I agree. A default value of auto for the keep-together.within-column property in the table.properties attribute-set is more reasonable. The current default value is always; it is inherited from formal.object.properties. I'd

[docbook-apps] Re: FW: long Tables in docbook using FOP

2008-02-17 Thread Ron Catterall
Mauritz Not appeared as yet (10:10 CST, 16:10 GMT). Do we have another delay in the build? Ron Mauritz Jeanson wrote, at 2/13/2008 11:35 AM: I agree. A default value of auto for the keep-together.within-column property in the table.properties attribute-set is more reasonable. I have