[docbook-apps] DocBook to FOP transformation produces "fo:table is missing child elements."

2010-06-09 Thread Jason Gilmore
Hi, I'm using the following command to convert a Docbook book to PDF: xsltproc -o intermediate-fo-file.fo \ --stringparam generate.index 1 \ --stringparam fop1.extensions 1 \ --stringparam double.sided 1 \ --stringparam page.height 9in \ --stringparam

Re: [docbook-apps] DocBook to FOP transformation produces "fo:table is missing child elements."

2010-06-09 Thread Bob Stayton
: Wednesday, June 09, 2010 12:25 PM Subject: [docbook-apps] DocBook to FOP transformation produces "fo:table is missing child elements." Hi, I'm using the following command to convert a Docbook book to PDF: xsltproc -o intermediate-fo-file.fo \ --stringparam generate.i

Re: [docbook-apps] DocBook to FOP transformation produces "fo:table is missing child elements."

2010-06-09 Thread Jason Gilmore
Message - From: "Jason Gilmore" > To: > Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2010 12:25 PM > Subject: [docbook-apps] DocBook to FOP transformation produces "fo:table is > missing child elements." > > >> Hi, >> >> I'm using the followi

Re: [docbook-apps] DocBook to FOP transformation produces "fo:table is missing child elements."

2010-06-09 Thread Bob Stayton
-- From: "Jason Gilmore" To: Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2010 12:25 PM Subject: [docbook-apps] DocBook to FOP transformation produces "fo:table is missing child elements." Hi, I'm using the following command to convert a Docbook book to PDF: xsltproc -o intermedia

Re: [docbook-apps] DocBook to FOP transformation produces "fo:table is missing child elements."

2010-06-10 Thread Jason Gilmore
on in your customization layer. > > Bob Stayton > Sagehill Enterprises > b...@sagehill.net > > > - Original Message - From: "Jason Gilmore" > To: > Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2010 12:50 PM > Subject: Re: [docbook-apps] DocBook to FOP transformation produces

Re: [docbook-apps] DocBook to FOP transformation produces "fo:table is missing child elements." - SOLVED

2010-06-10 Thread Jason Gilmore
Actually, I'm surprised the process got as far is it did. The tgroup >>> element in your table lacks a required cols attribute. In the stock >>> template matching on tgroup in fo/table.xsl, it checks for the absence of >>> that attribute and terminates processing