On 5/29/13 12:29 AM, David Cramer wrote:
> Maybe try the DocBook xslt 2.0 stylesheets [1] with Saxon 9.x for
> comparison as well.
Thanks you for that suggestion. I tried for a couple of hours to set
this up, and failed. Which means most of my co-developers will also
fail. Which reminds me of t
On 5/28/13 3:06 AM, Jirka Kosek wrote:
> I'm not sure whether chunkfast.xsl is really that faster then chunk.xsl.
It is, but only by 10% or so.
> But in your case I would try and benchmark Saxon instead of xsltproc. On
> larger documents and complex transforms it's usually much faster.
Saxon 6.5
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/28/2013 02:06 AM, Jirka Kosek wrote:
> On 28.5.2013 3:38, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
>> Building with xsltproc and the xhtml/chunkfast.xsl stylesheet
>> without customization takes about 18 minutes. (With
>> customizations to match what I had wi
On 28.5.2013 3:38, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Building with xsltproc and the xhtml/chunkfast.xsl stylesheet without
> customization takes about 18 minutes. (With customizations to match
> what I had with DSSSL, it takes longer still.)
I'm not sure whether chunkfast.xsl is really that faster then
I have embarked on converting the PostgreSQL documentation from DocBook
SGML + DSSSL to XML + XSLT. The problem is that the XSLT to chunked
HTML build is very very slow, even with the fast chunking.
To give you an estimate of the size, the PostgreSQL documentation is
about 2500 pages in PDF.
Bui
