Matt,
>If you want the benefits of DocBook with as little hassle as possible, then
>get a good, DTD-aware XML editor. My suggestion is then to download the
>HTML copy of _DocBook: The Definitive Guide_ (get it from docbook.org), and
>keep it open in a browser. In my opinion, working that way
At 05:43 14/01/2002 -0500, rpjday wrote:
>On Sun, 13 Jan 2002, Carlos Araya wrote:
>
> > And you talk about the tools, well that's another bottleneck. The tools
> > assume a technical level that most beginers don't have (even if they've
> > worked installing software before.) A couple days ago I a
On Sun, 13 Jan 2002, Carlos Araya wrote:
> And you talk about the tools, well that's another bottleneck. The tools
> assume a technical level that most beginers don't have (even if they've
> worked installing software before.) A couple days ago I asked about an RPM
> for Passivetex and even then
--gV1yUYniiDLxW66s
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 09:11:01PM -0800, Carlos Araya wrote:
> A couple days ago I asked about an RPM for Passivetex and even then
> I'm having a hell of time trying to find if I have the correct
> versio
>I guess it would be helpful if there was an application for
>XML/Docbook where you'd have all the allowed tags offered to you,
>either in a menu or in an XML comment tag or something like that.
That's what I mean by "a good, DTD-aware editor". They have lots of neat
features, many of which are
> DocBook is so thoroughly documented, in the reference section of TDG, that
> 99% of the time, it concisely provides *exactly* what you need to know. I
> claim that, working that way, a newbie can be 90% up the learning curve, in
> an afternoon, so long as you already have all your tools setup
>From: Rafael 'Dido' Sevilla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: DocBook with AbiWord?
>Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 13:59:06 +0800
>
>>writing my articles. But it's not apparent how I could get full
>>use of docbook from AbiWord. I asked about this on the
>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list,
On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 04:20:04PM -0500, Norman Walsh wrote:
>
> At can be ameliorated by technology, though. If you had a sufficiently
> configurable structured editor, you could make a fairly intuitive
> DocBook editor out of it by configuring it to "do the right DocBook
> thing" everywhere a
/ Daniel Veillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say:
| Very few could actually accept the rigidity due to the document structure
| and associated constraints. The problem is not technical, but nearly social
At can be ameliorated by technology, though. If you had a sufficiently
configurable s
On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 03:37:37PM -0500, Norman Walsh wrote:
> / Elliotte Rusty Harold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say:
> | I do not know what ABIWord does, but I don't think this as
> | fundamentally impossible as you claim. All that's needed is a standard
> | word processor interface, exce
/ Elliotte Rusty Harold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say:
| I do not know what ABIWord does, but I don't think this as
| fundamentally impossible as you claim. All that's needed is a standard
| word processor interface, except that instead of menu items like
| italic we have menu items like e
11 matches
Mail list logo
