Re: [libreoffice-documentation] Terminology: "selecting" is not enough!

2011-02-16 Thread David Nelson
Hi, :-) > I'll put something together. Until we've agreed on the way we want to go, I > don't think there should be any blanket changes to the existing terminology. +1. David Nelson -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to documentation+h...@libreoffice.org List archive: http://listarchives.libr

Re: [libreoffice-documentation] Terminology: "selecting" is not enough!

2011-02-16 Thread Barbara Duprey
That's OK, too, for checkbox (tickbox?) items, and maybe radio buttons. I think our terminology list needs to be updated and reviewed for the preferred way/ways to express this for the different UI items. I doubt there's a one-size-fits-all solution, though for me select comes closest. I'll put

Re: [libreoffice-documentation] Terminology: "selecting" is not enough!

2011-02-16 Thread David Nelson
Hi, :-) I often use "activate" or "deactivate". Or, speaking more loosely, "switch on" and "switch off". David Nelson -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to documentation+h...@libreoffice.org List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/documentation/ *** All posts to this list are pub

Re: [libreoffice-documentation] Terminology: "selecting" is not enough!

2011-02-16 Thread Barbara Duprey
I have another problem with the enabled/disabled terminology -- I think it can easily be misunderstood as modifiable/unmodifiable (available/"grayed out"). This terminology is not in common use and I think it would be more confusing than helpful. Often "click" would be a reasonable substitute, b

[libreoffice-documentation] LibreOffice Community starts 50,000 Euro challenge for setting-up its foundation

2011-02-16 Thread Florian Effenberger
LibreOffice Community starts 50,000 Euro challenge for setting-up its foundation German-based model provides best stability and safety for users, adopters, developers and enterprises Race for funds open until March 21st The Internet, February 16th, 2011 - The community around LibreOffice, th

Re: [libreoffice-documentation] Terminology: "selecting" is not enough!

2011-02-16 Thread Tom Davies
Hi :) I can totally agree with both points of view. I think select and de-select are probably easier to understand for more users although it is good to know why i felt uncomfortable about it! Enabled as the opposite of disabled is more uncomfortable politically since people in wheelchairs (a

[libreoffice-documentation] Re: Terminology: "selecting" is not enough!

2011-02-16 Thread JDługosz
Documentation and training material for USERS of GUIs specify it like that. The distinction might be more noticeable if you are not using the mouse. Like I said, in some contexts it is clear, and in other phrasing it is wrong. I'd rather be consistent and avoid the problem. -- View this message

Re: [libreoffice-documentation] BrOffice org in trouble?

2011-02-16 Thread David Nelson
Hi, :-) There's absolutely no reason why they can't use Alfresco. Speaking personally, I'll give all the help and cooperation I can, which obviously includes setting up a working space for them. David Nelson -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to documentation+h...@libreoffice.org List archive:

[libreoffice-documentation] BrOffice org in trouble?

2011-02-16 Thread Tom Davies
From someone in BrOffice org i got this email ... " Tom could you be kind enough to post the following to the documentation list ? - If I get further into this discussion don't worry, I'll re-join myself. - To the Documentation Team / TDF: We the Brazilian members of the TDF community are

Re: [libreoffice-documentation] Terminology: "selecting" is not enough!

2011-02-16 Thread Jean Hollis Weber
On Tue, 2011-02-15 at 23:59 -0800, JDługosz wrote: > I noticed in the chapters I'm working on that often various things, such as > all the items on the various pages of the Options dialog, it refers to > "selecting" an option. In one place it was more noticeable in the user was > directed to "sele