[Documentation-packages] [Bug 2043234] Re: Symlink for resolv.conf is wrong on fresh install

** Package changed: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu) => systemd (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Documentation Packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-docs in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2043234 Title: Symlink for resolv.conf is wrong on fresh install

[Documentation-packages] [Bug 2019045] Re: [snap] New Ubuntu font with normal weight displayed as bold in Google Docs in Chromium after upgrading to Lunar

I doubt this is relevant — it was long ago and before any snap was used by default — but I recall that when we started to use Noto fonts for CJK languages in Xenial, there was initially an issue in Chrome/Chromium where it used the wrong weight if the font file included multiple weights (bug

[Documentation-packages] [Bug 2037588] Re: Instructions for clearing notifications not accurate

Thanks for your report. On 2023-09-27 21:43, Joe-xenotropic wrote: > From the text of the page I infer that "clear list" button would > somehow be visible if I press Super+V or possibly click on a > notification after I press Super+V. In 23.04 there is no "Clear List" > button in either of those

[Documentation-packages] [Bug 2036981] Re: UIFe: update for the new snap store naming and icon

Thanks Steve and Zixing Liu! Want to mention that the translators were notified about the name change: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu- translators/2023-September/007900.html https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu- translators/2023-September/007902.html But I suppose that it won't

[Documentation-packages] [Bug 2036981] Re: UIFe: update for the new snap store naming and icon

In that case I apologize for my harsh tone in comment #12. Exactly when did it land, and how was it announced? Apparently I missed that announcement. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Documentation Packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-docs in Ubuntu.

[Documentation-packages] [Bug 2036981] Re: UIFe: update for the new snap store naming and icon

@Sebastien: I hope I haven't misunderstood it. But we have docs saying e.g. "Click on the Ubuntu Software icon in the dock...", and we refer to the application as "Ubuntu Software" so the name of the thing has been Ubuntu Software all since Mark(?) made that decision around final freeze for 16.04

[Documentation-packages] [Bug 2036981] Re: UIFe: update for the new snap store naming and icon

> but it should be a trivial change for translators since only the appname is changing This late change also affects documentation, and let me make it very clear: This kind of change in the documentation is anything but "trivial" for translators, since the name of the thing is often embedded in

[Documentation-packages] [Bug 2036981] Re: UIFe: update for the new snap store naming and icon

** Also affects: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Gunnar Hjalmarsson (gunnarhj) -- You received this bug notification b

[Documentation-packages] [Bug 2019906] Re: 23.04 : condensed, bold and black fonts can't be used for interface and title bar

I see the issue in Debian testing with mutter 43.4. So if the issue is not present in 22.10, and if it is a mutter thing, it may have happened somewhere between mutter 43.0 and 43.4. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Documentation Packages, which is subscribed to

[Documentation-packages] [Bug 2017573] Re: Font hinting broken on 23.04

On 2023-05-05 15:11, mgiammarco wrote: > Sorry but it is not closed for me, I have all font without correct > hint, and most without rgb hints. That statement is too sweeping to be useful in a bug report. The observations which mrvanes brought up have been sorted, and the additional aspects

[Documentation-packages] [Bug 2017573] Re: Font hinting broken on 23.04

Ok, that was just a thought and strictly unrelated to the contents of this bug discussion. Thanks for your patience with multiple clarifications and own efforts to nail down the problem. Closing the bug then. ** Changed in: fonts-ubuntu (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Invalid -- You

[Documentation-packages] [Bug 2017573] Re: Font hinting broken on 23.04

Thanks for your follow-up, mrvanes. I didn't even know that there are two fonts-liberation variants. Hmm.. I see that both fonts-liberation and fonts-liberation2 are installed by default on standard Ubuntu (both 22.04 and 23.04), which explains why I wasn't able to confirm any regression with

[Documentation-packages] [Bug 2017573] Re: Font hinting broken on 23.04

On 2023-05-02 17:43, Sebastien Bacher wrote: > I'm not a font expert Me neither. > but quoting https://github.com/canonical/Ubuntu-fonts/issues/82 > >> The variable font is unhinted (a standard practice), so you may >> see slightly different results between the new static and variable >> font.

[Documentation-packages] [Bug 2017573] Re: Font hinting broken on 23.04

@Sebastien: But yes, it might be related to the new variable font. This shows the result of my test: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/663331455/hinting-test_fonts-ubuntu.png So the new fonts-ubuntu (where hinting does not make a difference) looks rather similar to the old fonts-ubuntu with full

[Documentation-packages] [Bug 2017573] Re: Font hinting broken on 23.04

On 2023-05-02 15:33, Sebastien Bacher wrote: > Could have to do with the new variable fonts, you could try to > install the ubuntu-fonts deb from Kinetic and see if it has the same > issue Already did that. The wording of comment #37 was based on such a test, and the issue is not present if you

[Documentation-packages] [Bug 2017573] Re: Font hinting broken on 23.04

The latest significant change to libfreetype6 happened in 22.10, so I think you need to downgrade to the version shipped by 22.04 to possibly notice a difference. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Documentation Packages, which is subscribed to fonts-ubuntu in

[Documentation-packages] [Bug 2017573] Re: Font hinting broken on 23.04

@mgiammarco: I'm not a font expert, so this discussion is a bit over my head, I think. Nevertheless I miss some basic information which I believe is necessary to understand the nature of your observation: * Which are your effective fontconfig settings? * Which font(s) are not rendered as you

[Documentation-packages] [Bug 2017573] Re: Font hinting broken on 23.04

@Sebastien: One open issue from the discussion above is that the new Ubuntu font (fonts-ubuntu 0.863-0ubuntu3) does not honor the fonts hinting value set in Tweaks or directly via an equivalent fontconfig .conf file. fonts-ubuntu 0.83-6ubuntu1 does respect fonts hinting. Do you know whether the

[Documentation-packages] [Bug 2017573] Re: Font hinting broken on 23.04

Ok. The thought I had was that the Kubuntu fonts dialog may not reflect the actual rendering 100% correctly. I'm not claiming that's the case, but I feel there is such a risk. Anyway, I'm going to seek help to find out whether the changed behavior of the Ubuntu font is by design, or if it is a

[Documentation-packages] [Bug 2017573] Re: Font hinting broken on 23.04

Yes, Liberation Sans was last built on Ubuntu 3+ years ago before the 20.04 release, so we know that it's the very same font in the various releases. May I ask: Did you draw conclusions from the preview field in the fonts selection window only, or did you continue and saw the different

[Documentation-packages] [Bug 2017573] Re: Font hinting broken on Plasma 23.04

@mrvanes: I tested with Liberation Sans and Verdana on Ubuntu with GNOME. My notes: * I can confirm that Verdana honors the font hinting, both on 23.04 and 22.04. * I can confirm that Liberation Sans ignores the font hinting on 23.04. However, I see the very same behavior on 22.04. The

[Documentation-packages] [Bug 2017573] Re: Font hinting broken on Plasma 23.04

@mrvanes: You missed one aspect of my observations for the Ubuntu font. * On Ubuntu 22.04 font hinting works to start with. If I upgrade to the fonts-ubuntu 0.863-0ubuntu3 package there, the rendering happens irrespective of the font hinting value. * On Ubuntu 23.04 font hinting is broken to

[Documentation-packages] [Bug 2017573] Re: Font hinting broken on Plasma 23.04

And this is the picture I talked about. ** Attachment added: "hinting-test_fonts-ubuntu.png" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fonts-ubuntu/+bug/2017573/+attachment/5669015/+files/hinting-test_fonts-ubuntu.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Documentation-packages] [Bug 2017573] Re: Font hinting broken on Plasma 23.04

Thanks for being picky. I did a more thorough test on Ubuntu (with GNOME). I focused on the Ubuntu font, disabled antialiasing, tested with hining "none" respective "full", and studied the rendering of a particular string in GNOME's Settings menu. Conclusion: fonts-ubuntu 0.863 — unlike

[Documentation-packages] [Bug 1754804] Re: "fonts-ubuntu" package is marked as non-free

Well, if Canonical had agreed on fonts-ubuntu being non-free, it would have been sorted in the restricted pocket of the Ubuntu archive. But it's not. It's in main, i.e. the Canonical supported free software. I can agree that 100% clarity would have been better, but we are not there. The change

[Documentation-packages] [Bug 1754804] Re: "fonts-ubuntu" package is marked as non-free

That's my interpretation of the discussions you linked to and other discussions on a related Debian bug. Maybe the word "disagrees" was not used anywhere. What's your reason for bringing it up? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Documentation Packages, which is

[Documentation-packages] [Bug 2008601] Re: https://help.ubuntu.com/stable/ubuntu-help/video-dvd-restricted.html.ro needs update (libdvdread?)

mitted ** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Gunnar Hjalmarsson (gunnarhj) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Documentation Packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-docs in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2008601 Title

[Documentation-packages] [Bug 1999625] Re: man page for copy_file_range() not up to date with mainstream

That commit is included in the development version (coming Ubuntu 23.04). $ lsb_release -irs Ubuntu 23.04 $ dpkg-query -W manpages-dev manpages-dev6.01-1 $ man 2 copy_file_range | grep EOPNOTSUPP EOPNOTSUPP (since Linux 5.12) ** Package changed: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu) => manpages

[Documentation-packages] [Bug 1978128] Re: Add additional workspace switching shortcuts

Thanks for your suggestion. Please note that the page is actually an upstream GNOME Help one, so I would suggest that you also report it as an upstream issue: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-user-docs/-/issues If you do, please submit the URL to the upstream issue here for tracking

[Documentation-packages] [Bug 1978126] Re: Ctrl+Alt workspace shortcuts are incorrect in docs

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1948592 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1948592 ** Package changed: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu) => gnome-user-docs (Ubuntu) ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1948592 Switching between workspaces is now Ctrl-Alt-Right or Left, no longer Up or

[Documentation-packages] [Bug 1975866] Re: A continue or break from a subshell inside a loop no longer works.

This is not a bug about the Ubuntu Desktop Guide, so closing. I would recommend you to show your observation at Ask Ubuntu. If you then conclude that it's a bug, please report it against the bash package. ** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this

[Documentation-packages] [Bug 1804886] Re: add fix to "https://help.ubuntu.com/stable/ubuntu-help/power-suspendfail.html.en"

** Package changed: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu) => gnome-user-docs (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Documentation Packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-docs in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1804886 Title: add fix to

[Documentation-packages] [Bug 1804886] Re: add fix to "https://help.ubuntu.com/stable/ubuntu-help/power-suspendfail.html.en"

Thanks for initial report and additional suggestions! That page is actually from GNOME Help: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-user-docs/-/blob/master/gnome- help/C/power-suspendfail.page It would be great if you could submit an upstream issue with your suggestions:

[Documentation-packages] [Bug 1975512] Re: Incorrect instructions for "Screenshots and screencasts"

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1970588 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1970588 Thanks for your report. This has been reported previously, so I mark this bug as a duplicate. ** Package changed: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu) => gnome-user-docs (Ubuntu) ** This bug has been marked a duplicate

[Documentation-packages] [Bug 1973474] Re: Rename "Pin to Dash" to "Pin to Dock"

On 2022-05-17 11:35, Daniel van Vugt wrote: > Given how freely extensions might change things I would lean toward > never mentioning "dash" or "dock" in menu items. Like "Move to > favourites" since doing so removes the icon from the app grid. Sounds reasonable to me. But please note that some

[Documentation-packages] [Bug 1973474] Re: Rename "Pin to Dash" to "Pin to Dock"

@Daniel: If you don't agree, what would you prefer? I have already mentioned two suggestions to address the inconsistency. On 2022-05-17 05:03, Daniel van Vugt wrote: > * Regular users are less likely to understand "pinned" as much as > "favourites". This is not about "Pinned" vs. "Favorites".

[Documentation-packages] [Bug 1973474] Re: Rename "Pin to Dash" to "Pin to Dock"

If we go this route, we'll need yet another conditional in dash-to-dock. Adding gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock as affected package. ** Also affects: gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock (Ubuntu)

[Documentation-packages] [Bug 1973474] Re: Rename "Pin to Dash" to "Pin to Dock"

The reason why I bring up this early is that we are about to document Ubuntu differences in the desktop guide. So for both docs and translation reasons: Let's do this soon, and avoid some last minute UIF break. ** Changed in: gnome-shell (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Medium -- You

[Documentation-packages] [Bug 1973474] Re: Rename "Dock" to "Dash" in Appearance

Hmm.. Using "Pin to Dock" (via a gnome-shell patch I suppose) may be better. Doing so probably lets us keep the established "Dock" and still be consistent. Changing this bug accordingly. ** Also affects: gnome-shell (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in:

[Documentation-packages] [Bug 1973474] [NEW] Rename "Dock" to "Dash" in Appearance

Public bug reported: I noticed this commit: https://github.com/micheleg/dash-to-dock/commit/8ee55c29 If I understand it correctly, it means that we will use the label "Pin to Dash" instead of "Add to Favorites" as from Ubuntu 22.10. To be consistent I suggest that we rename the thing in all

[Documentation-packages] [Bug 1970588] Re: screen-shot-record.html doesn't reflect surprisingly swapped print screen key behaviour

Thanks for your report. You are right, that page does not reflect the latest changes to the screenshot experience. But the page has recently been updated upstream, and the updated page will be included in the 22.10 documentation. ** Package changed: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu) => gnome-user-docs

[Documentation-packages] [Bug 1968757] Re: [UIFe] New icon still not present on Ubuntu Desktop Guide

In Progress ** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu Jammy) Assignee: (unassigned) => Gunnar Hjalmarsson (gunnarhj) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Documentation Packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-docs in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1968757 Ti

[Documentation-packages] [Bug 1968757] Re: [UIFe] New icon still not present on Ubuntu Desktop Guide

@Adolfo: We used the previous logo in the same way for 10+ years, so we did not invent anything new. With that said, it's good that you asked for guidelines. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Documentation Packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-docs in Ubuntu.

[Documentation-packages] [Bug 1968757] Re: [UIFe] New icon still not present on Ubuntu Desktop Guide

Thanks Doug, that's a minor improvement. I followed up in the ubuntu- docs and helpwiki-light-moin-theme repos. ** Also affects: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Medium Status: Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Documentation Packages,

[Documentation-packages] [Bug 1968757] Re: [UIFe] New icon still not present on Ubuntu Desktop Guide

I found this: /usr/share/icons/Humanity/places/48/start-here.svg Resized it to 32x32 and exported as .png (attached). The circle itself is slightly larger, which I think makes it look better. And we wouldn't need to worry about doing anything which is not allowed. ** Attachment added:

[Documentation-packages] [Bug 1968757] Re: [UIFe] New icon still not present on Ubuntu Desktop Guide

@Doug: Don't apologize. It's my fault, of course. I shouldn't have rushed. But with that said, I think the image is useful. Any chance you can add transparency to it as Marcos suggested? Or would you prefer to ask for permission to change it to a square? -- You received this bug notification

[Documentation-packages] [Bug 1968757] Re: [UIFe] New icon still not present on Ubuntu Desktop Guide

ntu) Assignee: Gunnar Hjalmarsson (gunnarhj) => (unassigned) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Documentation Packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-docs in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1968757 Title: [UIFe] New icon still not present on Ubuntu Desktop

[Documentation-packages] [Bug 1968757] Re: New icon still not present on Ubuntu Desktop Guide

** Summary changed: - New icon still not present on Ubuntu Desktop Guide + [UIFe] New icon still not present on Ubuntu Desktop Guide ** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu) Milestone: later => None ** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Gunnar Hjalmarsson (gu

[Documentation-packages] [Bug 1968757] Re: New icon still not present on Ubuntu Desktop Guide

Hi Doug! I'm tempted to ask for ubuntu-logo.png to be changed before release, even if it's too late (we are in Final Freeze). As regards the web site, we should also change the logo in the header of all the pages. But that, and favicon.ico, are not technically tied to the release, and thus not

[Documentation-packages] [Bug 1968757] Re: New icon still not present on Ubuntu Desktop Guide

Right, something like that is what I have in mind too. But I think we should first ask if that way to use it is allowed. And note that the current logo is used both when browsing the guide through yelp and on the web version. We need to make sure it looks ok on both places. -- You received this

[Documentation-packages] [Bug 1968757] Re: New icon still not present on Ubuntu Desktop Guide

** Attachment added: "ubuntu-logo-dark.png" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-docs/+bug/1968757/+attachment/5580228/+files/ubuntu-logo-dark.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Documentation Packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-docs in

[Documentation-packages] [Bug 1968757] Re: New icon still not present on Ubuntu Desktop Guide

Thanks for your report! Unfortunately the new rectangular logo won't fit in all places where the icon is used in the Ubuntu Desktop Guide. So we need to figure out a way to handle that, but it will happen only for the 22.10 release. ** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided =>

[Documentation-packages] [Bug 1967947] Re: WiFi will not connect to open WiFi with complicated re-direct

Hi, It looks to me as if you are seeking support, not reporting a docs bug, so closing. Please use some support resource to seek support: https://ubuntu.com/support/community-support ** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification

[Documentation-packages] [Bug 1967859] Re: Ubuntu 22.04 Desktop Guide add-on

** Package changed: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu) => gnome-user-docs (Ubuntu) ** Changed in: gnome-user-docs (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Wishlist -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Documentation Packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-docs in Ubuntu.

[Documentation-packages] [Bug 1966633] Re: wrong keyboard shortcuts for switching workspaceserror

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1948592 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1948592 Marking this as duplicate of a similar bug. Anybody who wants to submit an upstream issue? ** Package changed: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu) => gnome-user-docs (Ubuntu) ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of

[Documentation-packages] [Bug 1965942] Re: Netmask should be replaced by Prefix?

Thanks for your report. Indeed it looks like it should be changed either on net-fixed-ip- address.page or Settings. The page is an upstream GNOME Help one. It would be great if you could call upstream's attention to the inconsistency by submitting an issue:

[Documentation-packages] [Bug 1952538] Re: Report a problem in Ubuntu page: Step 1: "nameofprogram" unclear

Thanks for your extended thoughts, Zian. However, that's a discussion far beyond the wording of the Ubuntu Desktop Guide and hence off topic on this bug report. I'm not quite sure, but I think the ubuntu-quality mailing list may be a proper place to raise that discussion.

[Documentation-packages] [Bug 1955534] Re: I am not able to change system settings.Suppose i go to settings and want to auto-hide the dock then it doesn't work i.e., whenever i click on OFF button , i

Not a docs bug at least. Closing. ** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Documentation Packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-docs in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1955534 Title: I am not

[Documentation-packages] [Bug 1954429] Re: wrong description in documentation

To make GNOME Classic selectable on the login screen, the gnome-shell- extensions package needs to be installed which it is not by default. (No, Akbarkhon, vanilla-gnome-desktop is not necessary. Indeed it pulls gnome-shell-extensions, but it pulls a myriad of other packages too.) The

[Documentation-packages] [Bug 1952538] Re: Report a problem in Ubuntu page: Step 1: "nameofprogram" unclear

I pushed this commit: https://git.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core-doc/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu- docs/commit/?id=7be57788 ** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Committed ** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Gunnar Hjalmarsson (gunnarhj) -

[Documentation-packages] [Bug 1952538] Re: Report a problem in Ubuntu page: Step 1: "nameofprogram" unclear

Thanks for your report. I agree that "nameofprogram" is ambiguous. Would "PACKAGENAME" be better? I.e. in your case: ubuntu-bug update-manager ** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Medium -- You

[Documentation-packages] [Bug 1948592] Re: Switching between workspaces is now Ctrl-Alt-Right or Left, no longer Up or Down

Thanks for your report. I suppose you mean this page: https://help.ubuntu.com/stable/ubuntu-help/shell-workspaces-switch.html That's actually an upstream issue, and it would be great if you could report it upstream too: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-user-docs/-/issues If you do, please

[Documentation-packages] [Bug 1947607] Re: Docs state to use ctrl-alt-shift-R to record screen recording, which will NEVER work correctly

Thanks for your report. It's not clear to me how that step-by-step page encourages users to "mis-use" the feature. Anyway, the page in question is from GNOME Help, and if you want to discuss its wording, I would recommend you to submit an upstream issue:

[Documentation-packages] [Bug 1945703] Re: Share your desktop documentation incorrect

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1667894 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1667894 Thanks for your report. You are right, and this will be corrected in the docs for 21.10. You can see it corrected in this preliminary publication:

[Documentation-packages] [Bug 1935797] Re: sound driver

You submitted a bug against the desktop documentation, but this is not such a bug. Actually I would suggest that you start with seeking support in order to get help to figure out the nature of the problem. https://ubuntu.com/support/community-support Closing. ** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu)

[Documentation-packages] [Bug 1933758] Re: Display resolution not properly identifying in Ubuntu 21.04

Some bot incorrectly changed this to a docs bug. Changing back to generic "Ubuntu". ** Package changed: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu) => ubuntu -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Documentation Packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-docs in Ubuntu.

[Documentation-packages] [Bug 1667894] Re: Remote desktop documenation not complete

@Felix: It should work if the gnome-remote-desktop package is installed (which it should be by default). Upstream issue about the need to update the documentation: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-user-docs/-/issues/124 ** Bug watch added: gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-user-docs/-/issues

[Documentation-packages] [Bug 1930857] Re: pages "Guide du bureau Ubuntu" only partially translated in french

Thanks for your report. It's the package gnome-user-docs whose translations into French need to be completed upstream: https://l10n.gnome.org/vertimus/gnome-user-docs/master/gnome-help/fr/ If you want to contribute yourself, please get in touch with the French translators team:

[Documentation-packages] [Bug 1930464] Re: settings - screen sharing -- not showing up

** Bug watch removed: gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-user-docs/-/issues #124 https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-user-docs/-/issues/124 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Documentation Packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-docs in Ubuntu.

[Documentation-packages] [Bug 1930464] Re: settings - screen sharing -- not showing up

Thanks for your report. That does not sound as a docs bug to me, but it's the functionality you are wondering about. So closing this bug. My advice would be to seek support at first hand at e.g. https://askubuntu.com to find out if you missed anything. Also, vino is an obsolete tool; see this

[Documentation-packages] [Bug 1929557] Re: Ubuntu 21.04 No alarm when Battery under 10%

Thanks for your report. The issue does not seem to be about the docs, though. Can you please provide some info about your system by running this command: apport-collect 1929557 ** Package changed: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu) => gnome-shell (Ubuntu) ** Changed in: gnome-shell (Ubuntu) Status:

[Documentation-packages] [Bug 1928017] Re: The Restriced Codecs article recommends an application that was recently discontinued

Thanks for calling our attention to this. It affects both ubuntu-docs and gnome-user-docs, so I submitted an upstream issue as well. ** Also affects: gnome-user-docs (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: gnome-user-docs (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Medium

[Documentation-packages] [Bug 1877085] Re: Log in with a fingerprint

ping Marco ** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu) Status: Expired => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Documentation Packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-docs in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1877085 Title: Log in with a fingerprint

[Documentation-packages] [Bug 1916953] Re: Printing does not work and documentation describing printer setup is incorrect

Good that you made it work. Not deleting the bug, though. :) Also minor bugs may be dealt with, so I reported it upstream. ** Package changed: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu) => gnome-user-docs (Ubuntu) ** Changed in: gnome-user-docs (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Low ** Changed in: gnome-user-docs

[Documentation-packages] [Bug 1915256] Re: Background and Lockscreen

Thanks for your report! You are indeed right, you can't change the background separately any longer in Ubuntu 20.10. The upstream docs has been corrected to reflect this: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-user-docs/-/commit/296ff6db and that correction will be included in Ubuntu 21.04. **

[Documentation-packages] [Bug 1877085] Re: Log in with a fingerprint

Thanks for your comment, Marco. Not sure about your conclusion, though. * Should g-c-c add a greyed out row when no devices are present? or * Should the docs be clarified, so the case with no devices is covered? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Documentation

[Documentation-packages] [Bug 1912614] Re: kASLR incorrectly described as disabled by default in Security/Features

On 2021-01-22 14:09, lo-na-aleim wrote: > Sorry for reaching out in the wrong place. No problem. > I guess the right place for this would have been the mailing list? Yeah, maybe.. > I started from: > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DocumentationTeam/SystemDocumentation Section > "How can I help?" gave

[Documentation-packages] [Bug 1912614] Re: kASLR incorrectly described as disabled by default in Security/Features

Thanks for your report! However, the ubuntu-docs package is for the Ubuntu desktop guide, and not for that wiki page you mentioned. I would suggest that you get in touch with members of to discuss possible changes of the page. I also subscribed that team

[Documentation-packages] [Bug 1899410] Re: VPN Stopped working after installing Ubuntu patch

Please note that ubuntu-docs is a package for the Desktop user documentation, and thus unrelated to the problem. Changed this report to a generic bug for now, since it lacks information about which package is the culprit. I see that you also posted at . **

[Documentation-packages] [Bug 1754804] Re: "fonts-ubuntu" package is marked as non-free

Submitted an equivalent proposal to Debian: https://salsa.debian.org/fonts-team/fonts-ubuntu/-/merge_requests/1 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Documentation Packages, which is subscribed to fonts-ubuntu in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1754804

[Documentation-packages] [Bug 1754804] Re: "fonts-ubuntu" package is marked as non-free

dium ** Changed in: fonts-ubuntu (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => In Progress ** Changed in: fonts-ubuntu (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Gunnar Hjalmarsson (gunnarhj) ** Tags added: patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Documentation Packag

[Documentation-packages] [Bug 1904153] Re: What happens when I suspend my computer? - No explanation given

Thanks for your report. The page in question is part of the Ubuntu Desktop Guide, which primarily targets inexperienced users. So it's not the right place to elaborate and include technical details. It's unfortunate that you experience problems with suspend. Please feel free to submit a bug

[Documentation-packages] [Bug 1898836] Re: keyboard and mouse usually disconnect

Thanks for your report, but it's apparently not a bug in the desktop documentation. Please feel free to file a new bug against a reasonable package. If you are using standard Ubuntu it may be gnome-shell, for instance. But if you do, please submit the bug using this terminal command: ubuntu-bug

[Documentation-packages] [Bug 478097] Re: help.ubuntu.com claims to be HTML 5 but is not (but extremely close)

Let's simply close this bug. (I for one can't see that the pages claim to comply with any specific standard nowadays, btw.) ** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Documentation Packages,

[Documentation-packages] [Bug 1873716] Re: Information on how to report a bug is incorrect

Fix pushed to repo. ** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Documentation Packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-docs in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1873716 Title:

[Documentation-packages] [Bug 1873716] Re: Information on how to report a bug is incorrect

On 2020-09-16 19:23, Daniel Letzeisen wrote: > I saw your message on the mailing list. The best thing I can suggest > in the documentation is a link to: > https://help.ubuntu.com/community/ReportingBugs#Filing_bugs_manually_at_Launchpad.net I see that that section does include this link:

[Documentation-packages] [Bug 1873716] Re: Information on how to report a bug is incorrect

I am uncertain about how to best deal with this bug. Asked for advice here: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu- bugsquad/2020-September/005210.html -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Documentation Packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-docs in Ubuntu.

[Documentation-packages] [Bug 1769127] Re: The Documentation at the "Ubuntu Desktop Guide/Install & remove software/Add a PPA" gives non-existent instructions

Fix pushed to repo ** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Committed ** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Gunnar Hjalmarsson (gunnarhj) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Documentation Packages,

[Documentation-packages] [Bug 1895065] Re: Drop net-chat.page and its sub pages

Fix pushed to repo ** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Documentation Packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-docs in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1895065 Title: Drop

[Documentation-packages] [Bug 1820357] Re: Instant messaging on Ubuntu

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1895065 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1895065 I decided to drop the whole "Chat & Social Networking" section. It has consisted of a few pages without any equivalent in GNOME Help. The contents is indeed obsolete, and I'm closing this bug by making it a

[Documentation-packages] [Bug 1895065] [NEW] Drop net-chat.page and its sub pages

not work due to bug #1887509. Let's stop confusing our users and drop the net-chat section. ** Affects: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu) Importance: Medium Assignee: Gunnar Hjalmarsson (gunnarhj) Status: In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Documentation-packages] [Bug 1891825] Re: x2go does not register fixed font path

ubuntu-docs is a package for Ubuntu's desktop guide, and your problem has apparently nothing to do with that. Re-assigning. ** Package changed: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu) => x2goserver (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Documentation Packages, which is

[Documentation-packages] [Bug 1886282] Re: Translation update of desktop guide

I verified the test case using - version 20.04.3 of ubuntu-docs - version 3.36.2+git20200704-0ubuntu0.1 of gnome-user-docs (and a few gnome-user-docs- packages) - version 3.36.2-0ubuntu0.1 of gnome-getting-started-docs (and a few gnome-getting-started-docs- packages) from focal-proposed.

[Documentation-packages] [Bug 1886305] Re: The apt link points to a transition package 'gnome-tweak-tool' instead of 'gnome-tweaks'

Thanks for your report. Yes it does, and that's intentional. https://git.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core-doc/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu- docs/tree/html/fix-urls.sed#n36 That way the link works also for Xenial users who navigate the latest version of the desktop guide online. But Xenial will be EOL in a

[Documentation-packages] [Bug 1886282] Re: Translation update of desktop guide

** Changed in: gnome-getting-started-docs (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: gnome-getting-started-docs (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Committed ** Changed in: gnome-getting-started-docs (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Gunnar Hjalmarsson (gunnarhj) *

[Documentation-packages] [Bug 1886282] Re: Translation update of desktop guide

** Also affects: gnome-getting-started-docs (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects:

[Documentation-packages] [Bug 1884860] Re: How to set default applications has changed in Ubuntu 20

Thanks for your report! I submitted an upstream merge request: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-user-docs/-/merge_requests/57 ** Package changed: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu) => gnome-user-docs (Ubuntu) ** Changed in: gnome-user-docs (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in:

[Documentation-packages] [Bug 1884158] Re: Failed to install Synaptic package manager in Ubuntu 20.04

That's bad, and there are several places where you can seek help to resolve the problem: https://ubuntu.com/support/community-support A bug report is not a way to request support, though. Closing. ** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug

[Documentation-packages] [Bug 1882938] Re: Procedure for printing booklet does not state application program

Thanks for your report. Which application do you have in mind? ** Package changed: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu) => gnome-user-docs (Ubuntu) ** Changed in: gnome-user-docs (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Documentation

[Documentation-packages] [Bug 1882811] Re: Documentation on burning CD/DVDs is no longer valid

Thanks for your report! For the record it's this page: https://help.ubuntu.com/stable/ubuntu-help/files-disc-write.html I don't have the hardware to test, but I suspect that the page presupposes that the brasero package is installed. Can you please install brasero, and let us know if the page

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >