Is there a plan to support LDAP group quotas in the future releases ?
Just like the ldap quota plugin for users but with additional support
for a unified quota for a group users.
--
giannis.
Hello!
Have you tried to export all symbols defined in lib archives generated
while dovecot is build? I've had this problem on aix with xlC and solved
it by writing an compiler script for doing that.
See
http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2007-February/019226.html
and
http://wiki.dovecot
thanks for the suggestion and it works. But out of curiosity does this work
using POP3.
On 3/27/07, Dean Manners <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
For the users that want to leave their messages on the server (and your
happy to obide), have them use IMAP instead of POP3.
Regards
At 6:41 PM +0800 3/27/07, Mohd Ikhwan Abdullah wrote:
thanks for the suggestion and it works. But out of curiosity does this work
using POP3.
No. POP3 is not designed for leaving mail on the server and tracking
message status there. Some POP3 servers will track message status by
marking anyth
Hi!
Compiled the latest cvs today, and noticed the changes in
src/master/main.c and master-settings.c.
With the versions 1.80.2.19 and 1.125.2.28 (respectively)
I can not start dovecot, because it says:
Fatal: dup2(stdin) failed: Bad file descriptor
Error: imap dump-capability process returned 89
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 23 Mar 2007, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Are you using ext3? I just found a bug in it that could cause this with
large maildirs.
You are right, I had been using ext3 with this test.
However, I'm thinking to switch over to XFS, because ext3 does n
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 23 Mar 2007, Troy Engel wrote:
This is probably the best news ever. I just had one of my testers beat on
this with ~4000 emails-at-once operations which have always timed out and
caused us grief. While it still takes forever and a day to ac
Hi all,
I'm new to the list, so ... hello everybody :-)
Let's go to the point... I'm implementing quota over imap support in my
mail server, so since a number of days I'm tring to upgrade to the new 1.x
version (debian sarge) ...
After having a number of troubles using the debian backport pa
I have error while compiling dovecot with GSSAPI under FreeBSD 6.2:
Is this dovecot-related or not?
cc -std=gnu99 -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -Wall -W
-Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -Wpointer-arith
-Wchar-subscripts -Wformat=2 -Wbad-function-cast -o dovecot-auth auth.o
auth-cac
> "TS" == Taras Savchuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
TS> I have error while compiling dovecot with GSSAPI under FreeBSD
TS> 6.2: Is this dovecot-related or not?
One suspects not since none of the dovecot code directly calls into the
krb5 API. It looks like a linkage problem with /usr/
Okay, to convince myself that quota handling was working okay with
Dovecot 1.0-rc27 on Solaris 10, I tested sending a message to an
account that was purposely over-quota. The account in question had
a vacation message set up.
For the first test, there was no $HOME/.imap directory at all.
I receiv
On 27.3.2007, at 22.40, Steven F Siirila wrote:
For the first test, there was no $HOME/.imap directory at all.
I received the vacation message, but the message which was supposed
to be delivered locally queued in Postfix (temporary failure).
Fixed: http://dovecot.org/list/dovecot-cvs/2007-Marc
On Thursday 08 March 2007 23:56:25 Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-03-08 at 14:02 -0800, Dan Price wrote:
> > #0 0xfef25e1a in gss_release_name () from /usr/lib/libgss.so.1
> > No symbol table info available.
> > #1 0x08064ccf in mech_gssapi_auth_free (request=0xfef3c000)
> > at mech-gssa
On 27.3.2007, at 15.29, Daniel wrote:
Compiled the latest cvs today, and noticed the changes in
src/master/main.c and master-settings.c.
With the versions 1.80.2.19 and 1.125.2.28 (respectively)
I can not start dovecot, because it says:
Fatal: dup2(stdin) failed: Bad file descriptor
Error: imap
On 27.3.2007, at 15.53, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
Are you using ext3? I just found a bug in it that could cause this
with
large maildirs.
You are right, I had been using ext3 with this test.
It wasn't ext3's fault actually after all what I noticed. In your
other test the problems could be ex
On 27.3.2007, at 16.59, Emiliano Gabrielli (aka AlberT) wrote:
It seems the dict{ .. } section in the dovecot.conf file is
*totally* ignored:
It is, unless you tell quota code to use it, like:
quota = dict:storage=10240:messages=1000 proxy::quotadict
If you still can't get it to work, set
Timo Sirainen wrote:
xfs is a lot slower than ext3 with maildir at least in my tests.
Do you have 'dir_index' option enabled on ext3?
Tomi
On 27.3.2007, at 11.12, Ioannis Zachariadis wrote:
Is there a plan to support LDAP group quotas in the future releases ?
Just like the ldap quota plugin for users but with additional
support for a unified quota for a group users.
There is no LDAP quota plugin, so I'm not completely sure what
On 27.3.2007, at 4.37, Stefan Klatt wrote:
is there a way to have different LDAP searches for different
Attributes?
No. And not really planned either. You can always use a checkpassword
script.
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On 27.3.2007, at 3.35, Steven F Siirila wrote:
The problem with this is that it would require adding asynchronous
DNS
library to Dovecot, or alternatively hoping that your DNS server is
never down (and hanging when it is). I don't really want to implement
the latter, and adding async DNS libra
On 27.3.2007, at 23.24, Tomi Hakala wrote:
Timo Sirainen wrote:
xfs is a lot slower than ext3 with maildir at least in my tests.
Do you have 'dir_index' option enabled on ext3?
Yep. It's on by default nowadays.
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
I really can't figure out what's going on below with IMAP and Pegasus
MAil
Timo, are you saying that the LIST "" "" is a valid command and dovecot
should be returning something - or should I hit up the Pegasus Mail
guys?
Other clients are functional, but none of them start a session with LIST
""
On Thu, 2007-03-22 at 11:20 -0500, Rick Romero wrote:
> # cat 20070322-105149-98198.out
> * OK [RAWLOG TIMESTAMP] 2007-03-22 10:51:49
> A2 OK List completed.
> * BYE Logging out
> A2 OK Logout completed.
>
> # cat 20070322-105149-98198.in
> A2 LIST "" ""
> A2 LOGOUT
Oh, now i get it. Originally I
On Mon, 2007-03-26 at 22:37 -0700, Dan Price wrote:
> Obviously we can patch the source, but I was wondering if we could
> have a gssapi_hostname setting in the config file?
Done: http://dovecot.org/list/dovecot-cvs/2007-March/008389.html
http://dovecot.org/list/dovecot-cvs/2007-March/008390.html
On Mon, 2007-03-26 at 23:01 +0200, Stephan Bosch wrote:
> Timo Sirainen schreef:
> > On 26.3.2007, at 22.59, Stephan Bosch wrote:
> >
> >> I coined this in my previous e-mail: if the master process could
> >> provide some means of dynamically registering new process types
> >> (protocols), e.g.
On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 11:28:54PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 27.3.2007, at 3.35, Steven F Siirila wrote:
>
> >>The problem with this is that it would require adding asynchronous
> >>DNS
> >>library to Dovecot, or alternatively hoping that your DNS server is
> >>never down (and hanging whe
On Tue, 2007-03-27 at 17:27 -0500, Steven F Siirila wrote:
>
> I don't know about that, but what I'm asking is.. how many people
> are allowing IMAP/POP3 connections (with authentication via user/pw)
> over non-secure (non-SSL/TLS) connections? I wouldn't think there
> would be many nowadays, an
http://dovecot.org/nightly/dovecot-latest.tar.gz
Any comments about the doc/wiki/ contents? doc/documentation.txt?
dovecot-example.conf's doc/wiki/ pointers?
./autogen.sh now updates the wiki from
http://www.dovecot.org/tmp/wiki-export.tar.gz (updated each night) if
doc/wiki/Authentication.txt do
I'm using dovecot 1.0 rc28 - great software!
I have a virtual hosting setup, with passdb and userdb both using a
passwd file.
I cannot get per-user quotas put in the relevant field of the userdb to
work. They appear to be completely ignored; only the setting
from /etc/dovecot.conf is applied.
On Tue, 2007-03-27 at 22:57 +0100, David Anderson wrote:
> I'm using dovecot 1.0 rc28 - great software!
>
> I have a virtual hosting setup, with passdb and userdb both using a
> passwd file.
>
> I cannot get per-user quotas put in the relevant field of the userdb to
> work. They appear to be co
On Mar 27, 2007, at 4:33 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Thu, 2007-03-22 at 11:20 -0500, Rick Romero wrote:
# cat 20070322-105149-98198.out
* OK [RAWLOG TIMESTAMP] 2007-03-22 10:51:49
A2 OK List completed.
* BYE Logging out
A2 OK Logout completed.
# cat 20070322-105149-98198.in
A2 LIST "" ""
A2 L
After v1.0 is released, I can finally get back to sane version numbers.
But any comments on which one is better:
a) Postfix-style: "1.1.UNSTABLE.MMDD" -> 1.1.0 (stable)
b) Odd-even numbering: 1.1.x (unstable) -> 1.2.0 (stable)
With a) style the releases could be done by simply copying a nigh
On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 03:46 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> After v1.0 is released, I can finally get back to sane version numbers.
> But any comments on which one is better:
>
> a) Postfix-style: "1.1.UNSTABLE.MMDD" -> 1.1.0 (stable)
>
> b) Odd-even numbering: 1.1.x (unstable) -> 1.2.0 (stable
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 01:58:34AM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-03-27 at 17:27 -0500, Steven F Siirila wrote:
> >
> > I don't know about that, but what I'm asking is.. how many people
> > are allowing IMAP/POP3 connections (with authentication via user/pw)
> > over non-secure (non-S
Aredridel wrote:
>> b) Odd-even numbering: 1.1.x (unstable) -> 1.2.0 (stable)
>>
>> With a) style the releases could be done by simply copying a nightly
>> snapshot to releases/ directory and announcing the changes since the
>> last release. I'm not sure if that's good or bad.
>
> For the sake of
On 02:46:40 2007-03-28 Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> After v1.0 is released, I can finally get back to sane version numbers.
> But any comments on which one is better:
>
> a) Postfix-style: "1.1.UNSTABLE.MMDD" -> 1.1.0 (stable)
>
> b) Odd-even numbering: 1.1.x (unstable) -> 1.2.0
Quoting Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
a) Postfix-style: "1.1.UNSTABLE.MMDD" -> 1.1.0 (stable)
Not my favorite, but works for me. Seems good for Timo, since he
likes to release dated snapshots anyway.
b) Odd-even numbering: 1.1.x (unstable) -> 1.2.0 (stable)
I don't like this, as
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 03:46:40AM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> After v1.0 is released, I can finally get back to sane version numbers.
> But any comments on which one is better:
>
> a) Postfix-style: "1.1.UNSTABLE.MMDD" -> 1.1.0 (stable)
>
> b) Odd-even numbering: 1.1.x (unstable) -> 1.2.0
28.03.07 в 03:46 Timo Sirainen в своём письме писал(а):
After v1.0 is released, I can finally get back to sane version numbers.
But any comments on which one is better:
a) Postfix-style: "1.1.UNSTABLE.MMDD" -> 1.1.0 (stable)
b) Odd-even numbering: 1.1.x (unstable) -> 1.2.0 (stable)
With a
On Wed, 28 Mar 2007 03:46:40 +0300, Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> After v1.0 is released, I can finally get back to sane version numbers.
> But any comments on which one is better:
>
> a) Postfix-style: "1.1.UNSTABLE.MMDD" -> 1.1.0 (stable)
>
> b) Odd-even numbering: 1.1.x (unsta
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/28/07 9:46 am, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> After v1.0 is released, I can finally get back to sane version numbers.
> But any comments on which one is better:
>
> a) Postfix-style: "1.1.UNSTABLE.MMDD" -> 1.1.0 (stable)
>
> b) Odd-even numbering:
Timo Sirainen wrote:
After v1.0 is released, I can finally get back to sane version numbers.
But any comments on which one is better:
a) Postfix-style: "1.1.UNSTABLE.MMDD" -> 1.1.0 (stable)
b) Odd-even numbering: 1.1.x (unstable) -> 1.2.0 (stable)
With a) style the releases could be done b
Timo Sirainen wrote:
After v1.0 is released, I can finally get back to sane version numbers.
But any comments on which one is better:
a) Postfix-style: "1.1.UNSTABLE.MMDD" -> 1.1.0 (stable)
b) Odd-even numbering: 1.1.x (unstable) -> 1.2.0 (stable)
I like (a) but even better I like 1.1.0{a
On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 11:28:24PM -0700, Frank Cusack wrote:
> >Timo Sirainen wrote:
> >>After v1.0 is released, I can finally get back to sane version numbers.
> >>But any comments on which one is better:
> >>
> >>a) Postfix-style: "1.1.UNSTABLE.MMDD" -> 1.1.0 (stable)
> >>
> >>b) Odd-even nu
Hi,
El Miércoles, 28 de Marzo de 2007 04:55, Eric Rostetter escribió:
> Why not just put actual (stable) releases in the "releases/" directory, and
> put the "unstable" releases in another directory (unstable, testing, or
> some such).
I think this is the easier way. If it's clear that unstable i
45 matches
Mail list logo
