Re: [Dovecot] Missing MIME-Version header in e-mails.

On Wed, August 1, 2007 8:36 pm, Tan Shao Yi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Will it be possible to make this available in the 1.0 branch? UW-IMAP > seems to continue to process e-mails without the MIME-Version, so long as > it has the Content-Type or -Encoding header. It's an easy patch if you want t

Re: [Dovecot] Missing MIME-Version header in e-mails.

On Wed, 1 Aug 2007, Bill Boebel wrote: On Wed, August 1, 2007 9:51 am, Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: On Wed, 2007-08-01 at 19:50 +0800, Tan Shao Yi wrote: Hi, I notice that in src/lib-mail/message-parser.c, there is a section of code that checks for the presence of MIME-Version be

[Dovecot] Resend: How do I configure sendmail to accept emails for dovecot when dovecot has sql auth/user db.

Apologies for resending this, I am not sure it made it through the first time.. --- Included below are my config files: sendmail.mc, dovecot.m4, dovecot.conf, dovecot-sql.conf. Whenever I try to send email into this system, it rejects it with user does not exist, however, the user does e

Re: [Dovecot] Missing MIME-Version header in e-mails.

On Wed, August 1, 2007 9:51 am, Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > On Wed, 2007-08-01 at 19:50 +0800, Tan Shao Yi wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I notice that in src/lib-mail/message-parser.c, there is a section of >> code that checks for the presence of MIME-Version before allowing >> processing of t

Re: [Dovecot] OpenBSD and too many open files

On Aug 1, 2007, at 11:09 AM, Quentin Garnier wrote: Well, the problem is Christos did some other stuff in that commit than just fixing the bug. Try the attached patch. Thank you for the patch. It applied cleanly and I have a kernel that reflects the patch running right now. So far so good.

[Dovecot] Editing sieve files

Hi all I've got a standard dovecot setup: home is /var/spool/vmail/domain/user/ uid: vmail gid: vmail Sieve file is: /var/spool/vmail/domain/user/.dovecot.sieve if i want to change the dovecot-sieve file to modify the rules (or even let my users do it at some point) then it has to been done by ro

Re: [Dovecot] sieve discard

On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 03:02:38PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote: > sievec and sieved binaries are built only if you use 2) method, because > they need to link with Dovecot's libraries. They can be used to compile and > decompile Sieve scripts. You probably don't need these. According to the Makefile

[Dovecot] dovecot: child 1690 (auth-worker) killed with signal 11

Hi there, I've been seeing this for quite a while now, but only today finally got off my lazy you-know-what and did a backtrace. Here's the requested info as per http://dovecot.org/bugreport.html: * Dovecot version [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# dovecot --version 1.0.3 * Operating system or Linux distr

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot: child 1690 (auth-worker) killed with signal 11

* Thomas Zajic, 2007-08-01 21:37 > #1 0x08056954 in auth_worker_handle_passl (client=0x8089e18, id=3, > args=0x808a082 > "user=zlatko-mail\tservice=IMAP\tlip=192.168.1.3\trip=192.168.1.1\tsecured=1") > at auth-worker-client.c:242 > auth_request = (struct auth_request *) 0x808a3f0 >

Re: [Dovecot] Outlook 2000/2003 frequent disconnect issue

On Aug 1, 2007, at 12:10 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote: I think the problem has to do with NSS. It probably failed with some error, but since unfortunately getpwnam() interface doesn't support reporting errors, Dovecot just assumed that the user didn't exist. I can't think of why this would work any

Re: [Dovecot] Outlook 2000/2003 frequent disconnect issue

On Wed, 2007-08-01 at 12:05 -0700, Jeff Ramsey wrote: > Aug 1 11:58:51 imap dovecot: auth(default): passwd(QUINAULT- > ileneyoung,:::10.200.254.110): lookup > Aug 1 11:58:51 imap dovecot: auth(default): passwd(QUINAULT- > ileneyoung,:::10.200.254.110): unknown user .. > Perhaps this she

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot-auth core dumps

Sorry about the no 'bt full'. Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x107712a8 in gss_delete_sec_context () from /usr/lib/libgssapi.so.8 (gdb) bt full #0 0x107712a8 in gss_delete_sec_context () from /usr/lib/libgssapi.so.8 No symbol table info available. #1 0x0

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot-auth core dumps

On Wed, 2007-08-01 at 13:01 -0600, Cassidy B. Larson wrote: > It appears the issue is when someone uses gssapi to authenticate. > Hope this is what you want: .. > Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. > 0x107712a8 in gss_delete_sec_context () > from /usr/lib/libgssapi.so.8 I

Re: [Dovecot] Outlook 2000/2003 frequent disconnect issue

On Aug 1, 2007, at 9:47 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote: On 1.8.2007, at 18.43, Jeff Ramsey wrote: Since my initial post, I have noticed this in my log file as well: Aug 1 08:13:42 imap dovecot: auth(default): userdb (johnfowler,:::65.174.242.248): user not found from userdb Aug 1 08:13:42 imap

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot-auth core dumps

It appears the issue is when someone uses gssapi to authenticate. Hope this is what you want: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# gdb /usr/local/libexec/dovecot/dovecot-auth 5863 GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD] Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public Licens

Re: [Dovecot] mbox inbox default

On Aug 1 2007, Timo Sirainen wrote: On Wed, 2007-08-01 at 08:58 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We're an mbox environment, inboxes in /var/mail/$USER (I'll include dovecot -n output at the bottom of this mail). mail_location is set accordingly for deliver. I'd assumed that if the /var/mail/$

[Dovecot] How do I configure sendmail to accept emails for dovecot when dovecot has sql auth/user db.

Included below are my config files: sendmail.mc, dovecot.m4, dovecot.conf, dovecot-sql.conf. Whenever I try to send email into this system, it rejects it with user does not exist, however, the user does exist as far as dovecot (imap) is concerned, it is in the database. THANKS - Yossie

Re: [Dovecot] OpenBSD and too many open files

On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 10:56:26AM -0700, Bryan Vyhmeister wrote: > On Aug 1, 2007, at 10:37 AM, Quentin Garnier wrote: > > >On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 07:01:35PM +0200, Quentin Garnier wrote: > >[...] > >>Which does look like what is experienced here. Now, I don't know > >>if we > >>can locate ea

Re: [Dovecot] OpenBSD and too many open files

On Aug 1, 2007, at 10:37 AM, Quentin Garnier wrote: On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 07:01:35PM +0200, Quentin Garnier wrote: [...] Which does look like what is experienced here. Now, I don't know if we can locate easily what fix needs to be applied to OpenBSD. Check if this applies to OpenBSD: ht

Re: [Dovecot] OpenBSD and too many open files

On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 07:01:35PM +0200, Quentin Garnier wrote: [...] > Which does look like what is experienced here. Now, I don't know if we > can locate easily what fix needs to be applied to OpenBSD. Check if this applies to OpenBSD: http://cvsweb.netbsd.org/bsdweb.cgi/src/sys/kern/sys_pipe

Re: [Dovecot] OpenBSD and too many open files

On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 07:52:33PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On 1.8.2007, at 19.43, Quentin Garnier wrote: > > >FWIW, I've stopped using dovecot's kqueue code quite some time ago > >because it would leak one fd almost every login, leading to the > >kind of > >situation you experience. I wis

Re: [Dovecot] OpenBSD and too many open files

On Aug 1, 2007, at 9:52 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote: On 1.8.2007, at 19.43, Quentin Garnier wrote: FWIW, I've stopped using dovecot's kqueue code quite some time ago because it would leak one fd almost every login, leading to the kind of situation you experience. I wish I had the time to debug

Re: [Dovecot] MANAGESIEVE patch v5 for dovecot 1.0.2

On Wednesday 01 August 2007 17:53:16 Stephan Bosch wrote: > Hi Andreas, > > On Wed, 2007-08-01 at 16:45 +0200, Stephan Bosch wrote: > > Most likely the problem relates to the fact that, unless configured > > otherwise, dovecot will refuse to use plain text SASL mechanisms if the > > connection is n

Re: [Dovecot] OpenBSD and too many open files

On 1.8.2007, at 19.43, Quentin Garnier wrote: FWIW, I've stopped using dovecot's kqueue code quite some time ago because it would leak one fd almost every login, leading to the kind of situation you experience. I wish I had the time to debug that, but unfortunately... I thought this happen

Re: [Dovecot] OpenBSD and too many open files

On Aug 1, 2007, at 9:41 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote: You didn't say which process got the "too many files" error, but usually it's the Dovecot master process. Could you show the exact error message so I can be sure? Here you showed only imap, imap- login and pop3-login processes, not dovecot pro

Re: [Dovecot] Outlook 2000/2003 frequent disconnect issue

On 1.8.2007, at 18.43, Jeff Ramsey wrote: Aug 1 08:09:44 imap dovecot: imap-login: Login: user=, method=PLAIN, rip=:::10.11.254.52, lip=:::65.174.242.66 Aug 1 08:09:44 imap dovecot: IMAP(jefframsey): Disconnected: Logged out I have read that this means that the client was the one

Re: [Dovecot] OpenBSD and too many open files

On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 09:36:49AM -0700, Bryan Vyhmeister wrote: > On Aug 1, 2007, at 9:25 AM, Quentin Garnier wrote: > > >Sounds more like a file descriptor leak. Check fstat output so see > >what > >kind of descriptors are leaked, how fast, etc. > > Thank you for your quick response. Unfort

Re: [Dovecot] OpenBSD and too many open files

On 1.8.2007, at 19.36, Bryan Vyhmeister wrote: On Aug 1, 2007, at 9:25 AM, Quentin Garnier wrote: Sounds more like a file descriptor leak. Check fstat output so see what kind of descriptors are leaked, how fast, etc. Thank you for your quick response. Unfortunately, I restarted dovecot

Re: [Dovecot] OpenBSD and too many open files

On Aug 1, 2007, at 9:25 AM, Quentin Garnier wrote: Sounds more like a file descriptor leak. Check fstat output so see what kind of descriptors are leaked, how fast, etc. Thank you for your quick response. Unfortunately, I restarted dovecot this morning and so this probably isn't very help

Re: [Dovecot] OpenBSD and too many open files

On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 09:19:11AM -0700, Bryan Vyhmeister wrote: > I posted some questions a few months back and received lots of great > help in getting my dovecot/postfix/LDAP setup working. Initially, I > ran into the pipe failed too many open files error. I am running this > setup on Ope

[Dovecot] OpenBSD and too many open files

I posted some questions a few months back and received lots of great help in getting my dovecot/postfix/LDAP setup working. Initially, I ran into the pipe failed too many open files error. I am running this setup on OpenBSD/sparc64 4.1-stable and so I put dovecot in its own class and upped

Re: [Dovecot] sieve discard

On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 10:52:18AM -0400, Tom Diehl wrote: > I do not know what OS you are packaging for but if you are looking for > rpms, fedora has released rpms that include seive in the same srpm as > dovecot. I took their .src.rpm and rebuilt it on EL4/Centos4 and it spit > out seperate dovec

Re: [Dovecot] MANAGESIEVE patch v5 for dovecot 1.0.2

Hi Andreas, On Wed, 2007-08-01 at 16:45 +0200, Stephan Bosch wrote: > Most likely the problem relates to the fact that, unless configured > otherwise, dovecot will refuse to use plain text SASL mechanisms if the > connection is not encrypted. I haven't re-tested the STARTTLS command in > the last

Re: [Dovecot] Outlook 2000/2003 frequent disconnect issue

On Aug 1, 2007, at 2:26 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote: On Tue, 2007-07-31 at 17:12 -0700, Jeff Ramsey wrote: I am now getting the following message on all Outlook Clients: "Your IMAP Server closed the connectionthis can occur if the connection is idle for too long" What does Dovecot show in lo

Re: [Dovecot] sieve discard

On Wed, 1 Aug 2007, Geert Hendrickx wrote: On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 03:02:38PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote: Or I guess since this hasn't been a problem normally I could just remove it unless it becomes a common problem. Updated the text: Use --with-dovecot= to point to dovecot-config file's dire

Re: [Dovecot] MANAGESIEVE patch v5 for dovecot 1.0.2

On Wed, 2007-08-01 at 15:27 +0200, Andreas Ntaflos wrote: > On Tuesday 31 July 2007 01:41:11 Stephan Bosch wrote: > > Have fun testing the patch. Notify me when there are problems. > > Hello Stephan, > > I still get the following message when trying to connect and authenticate: > > Choose a dif

Re: [Dovecot] High cpu usage OpenSolaris

Last I heard it was that poll() was called all the time with zero (or 1ms?) timeout. So the problem is probably in src/lib/ioloop.c io_loop_get_wait_time() getting optimized wrong. Hmm.. poll/timeout problems. Sounds suspiciously like: http://groups.google.se/group/comp.unix.solaris/browse_t

Re: [Dovecot] mbox inbox default

On Wed, 2007-08-01 at 08:58 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > We're an mbox environment, inboxes in /var/mail/$USER (I'll include dovecot > -n output at the bottom of this mail). mail_location is set accordingly for > deliver. > > I'd assumed that if the /var/mail/$USER file doesn't exist, dovec

[Dovecot] mbox inbox default

HI Timo & all. We're an mbox environment, inboxes in /var/mail/$USER (I'll include dovecot -n output at the bottom of this mail). mail_location is set accordingly for deliver. I'd assumed that if the /var/mail/$USER file doesn't exist, dovecot would create it, but we've discovered from exper

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot 1.0.x and NFS-mounted mailstore quotas

Greetings - On 31 Jul 2007, at 17:18, Mike Brudenell wrote: I'm attaching the patch files and a tar archive that comprise the changes I use to support reading quotas from NFS-mounted filestore. The patches are against the Dovecot 1.0.2 source code. Just to let you know that the patches/co

Re: [Dovecot] [Dovecot-news] v1.0.3 released

On Wed, 2007-08-01 at 14:21 +0200, Geert Hendrickx wrote: > On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 02:41:44PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote: > > 1.0.2 works just fine with it. The version numbers just have happened to > > be the same earlier. > > Is this documented somewhere? I guess download page would be the onl

Re: [Dovecot] Missing MIME-Version header in e-mails.

On Wed, 2007-08-01 at 19:50 +0800, Tan Shao Yi wrote: > Hi, > > I notice that in src/lib-mail/message-parser.c, there is a section of > code that checks for the presence of MIME-Version before allowing > processing of the Content-* headers. > > Is there a possibility of relaxing this rule? Ther

Re: [Dovecot] Mount options and NFS: just checking...

On Wed, 2007-08-01 at 14:19 +0100, Mike Brudenell wrote: > In case it makes a difference, messages will generally be delivered > by a user's preferred IMAP server, but by Exim rather than Dovecot's > "deliver". > > "actimeo=0" option > NFS-mounted Message Store: NOT needed, but if used ca

Re: [Dovecot] High cpu usage OpenSolaris

On Wed, 2007-08-01 at 15:12 +0200, DINH Viêt Hoà wrote: > On 8/1/07, Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sun, 2007-07-29 at 21:27 -0400, Gary Gendel wrote: > > > All, > > > > > > Nevermind... I discovered the problem. It was in the Solaris Sun Studio > > > 12 compiler. I created a debug

Re: [Dovecot] mbox bug in 1.0.0

On Jun 19 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On May 13 2007, Timo Sirainen wrote: On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 13:40 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Apr 23 13:22:41 server.umn.edu dovecot: [ID 107833 local6.error] [9073] IMAP(USER): mbox /var/mail/user: seq=1 uid=8808 uid_broken=0 originally needed 10

Re: [Dovecot] MANAGESIEVE patch v5 for dovecot 1.0.2

On Tuesday 31 July 2007 01:41:11 Stephan Bosch wrote: > Have fun testing the patch. Notify me when there are problems. Hello Stephan, I still get the following message when trying to connect and authenticate: Choose a different authentication method to PLAIN. The same with LOGIN when I tell Do

Re: [Dovecot] Mount options and NFS: just checking...

Hi, Timo - On 1 Aug 2007, at 13:14, Timo Sirainen wrote: Q3. Which of the filestores should I mount with the "noatime" option? A3. Safe to use "noatime" for all three filestores. (I understand Dovecot will use utime() when needed on such filestores, but am not sure if it will wor

Re: [Dovecot] High cpu usage OpenSolaris

On 8/1/07, Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 2007-07-29 at 21:27 -0400, Gary Gendel wrote: > > All, > > > > Nevermind... I discovered the problem. It was in the Solaris Sun Studio > > 12 compiler. I created a debug version to begin testing, but that > > version worked without sucki

Re: [Dovecot] sieve discard

On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 03:02:38PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote: > Or I guess since this hasn't been a problem normally I could just remove > it unless it becomes a common problem. Updated the text: > > Use --with-dovecot= to point to dovecot-config file's directory. > There are two possibilities wh

Re: [Dovecot] [Dovecot-news] v1.0.3 released

On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 02:41:44PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote: > 1.0.2 works just fine with it. The version numbers just have happened to > be the same earlier. Is this documented somewhere? Or how do we know which dovecot-sieve version matches which dovecot version(s)? I thought they always had

Re: [Dovecot] Mount options and NFS: just checking...

On Wed, 2007-08-01 at 12:54 +0100, Mike Brudenell wrote: > We will have a pair of Solaris 10 servers on which Dovecot 1.0.3 is > running. Users are normally directed to their "preferred" server > but, if it is unavailable, will go via the other server. > > Q1. Am I right in thinking that for

Re: [Dovecot] sieve discard

On Wed, 2007-08-01 at 14:46 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On Wed, 2007-08-01 at 06:51 -0400, Bruce Bodger wrote: > > This comment still remains in the dovecot-sieve "INSTALL"... > > > > "It's also not a good idea to build the plugin against self-compiled > > Dovecot sources, > > but then actuall

[Dovecot] Mount options and NFS: just checking...

Greetings - I'm now in the last couple of weeks before going live with Dovecot (v1.0.3) on our revamped IMAP service. I'd like to double-check about the best mount options to use; could someone advise, please? I have three separate directory trees for the message store, the control files

[Dovecot] Missing MIME-Version header in e-mails.

Hi, I notice that in src/lib-mail/message-parser.c, there is a section of code that checks for the presence of MIME-Version before allowing processing of the Content-* headers. Is there a possibility of relaxing this rule? There are some broken mailers, in particular newsletter mailers that

Re: [Dovecot] sieve discard

On Wed, 2007-08-01 at 06:51 -0400, Bruce Bodger wrote: > This comment still remains in the dovecot-sieve "INSTALL"... > > "It's also not a good idea to build the plugin against self-compiled > Dovecot sources, > but then actually use a prebuilt binary package of Dovecot. That > might work > if

Re: [Dovecot] [Dovecot-news] v1.0.3 released

On Wed, 2007-08-01 at 13:04 +0200, Geert Hendrickx wrote: > On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 01:22:59PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote: > > http://dovecot.org/releases/1.0/dovecot-1.0.3.tar.gz > > http://dovecot.org/releases/1.0/dovecot-1.0.3.tar.gz.sig > > No dovecot-sieve-1.0.3 tarball (yet)? 1.0.2 works ju

Re: [Dovecot] v1.0.3 released

Timo Sirainen wrote: http://dovecot.org/releases/1.0/dovecot-1.0.3.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/1.0/dovecot-1.0.3.tar.gz.sig Thank you! -- Leroy

Re: [Dovecot] [Dovecot-news] v1.0.3 released

On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 01:22:59PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote: > http://dovecot.org/releases/1.0/dovecot-1.0.3.tar.gz > http://dovecot.org/releases/1.0/dovecot-1.0.3.tar.gz.sig No dovecot-sieve-1.0.3 tarball (yet)? Geert

Re: [Dovecot] sieve discard

On Aug 1, 2007, at 6:29 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote: Since the last changes for http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-sieve-1.0/ are: Added tag 1.0.2 for changeset 0afb958e7e71 Released v1.0.2. There isn't really anything to be released as v1.0.3. :) Timo, This comment still remains in the dovecot-s

Re: [Dovecot] sieve discard

On Wed, 2007-08-01 at 08:25 +0200, Nils Vogels wrote: > Hi Timo, > > Timo Sirainen wrote on 23-7-2007 7:13: > > On Mon, 2007-07-23 at 00:52 -0400, Jim Horner wrote: > > > >> Does the keyword/action discard work by default or is there something I > >> have > >> to do in the configuration to ge

[Dovecot] v1.0.3 released

http://dovecot.org/releases/1.0/dovecot-1.0.3.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/1.0/dovecot-1.0.3.tar.gz.sig - deliver: v1.0.2's bounce fix caused message to be always saved to INBOX even if Sieve script had discard, reject or redirect commands. - LDAP: auth_bind=yes and

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot-uidlist locking

On Tue, 2007-07-24 at 11:58 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On 24.7.2007, at 11.33, Tony Tsang wrote: > > > I've a dovecot server setup and occassionally clients cannot get mails > > from their inbox. When I inspect the maildir for that user, there is > > stale dovecot-uidlist.lock file, and imap pr

Re: [Dovecot] Outlook 2000/2003 frequent disconnect issue

version: 1.0.2 imap_client_workarounds = outlook-idle And I've no problem with OE 6.0. I've been testing with imap since I read your first post, and there have not been any disconnections. I don't know about OE2003. /Bachman Sergey A. Kobzar skrev: Hi Jeff, Did you try play with imap_client_

Re: [Dovecot] user name before and after authentication

On Fri, 2007-07-27 at 19:19 +0700, François Wautier wrote: > The LDAP module gets the DN for my user and verify that it can binds, > and in > the process changes the "user" to > cn=,cn=Users,dc=domain,dc=ext Well, that shouldn't be happening. I guess you haven't set

Re: [Dovecot] IMAPs and POP3s poxying

On Fri, 2007-07-27 at 09:10 -0400, Jason Russler wrote: > How > would I configure Dovecot to proxy another single system without doing > the SQL look-up? Dovecot isn't really designed for that kind of a proxying, so you can't avoid it. > Is there a port-forwarding solution that would work > be

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot-auth core dumps

On Mon, 2007-07-30 at 14:06 -0600, Cassidy B. Larson wrote: > gdb /usr/local/libexec/dovecot/dovecot-auth /var/run/dovecot/dovecot- > auth.core This looks correct. > (gdb) bt full > #0 0x180abc22 in gss_delete_sec_context () from /usr/lib/libgssapi.so.8 > No symbol table info available. > #1 0

Re: [Dovecot] IMAP-Proxy and LDAP?

On Mon, 2007-07-30 at 22:59 +0200, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote: > I am doing some research on Dovecots IMAP-Proxy features mentioned in > and > . > > The docs only mention SQL as backend to hold req

Re: [Dovecot] apparent bug with filesystem quota and message lists

On Mon, 2007-07-30 at 11:34 -0400, Stewart Dean wrote: > When users go over quota, when they login the next time, the folder list > is blank. I don't see why this would happen. Listing mailboxes doesn't try to write anything to filesystem. Can you try this yourself by making an account over quota

Re: [Dovecot] High cpu usage OpenSolaris

On Sun, 2007-07-29 at 21:27 -0400, Gary Gendel wrote: > All, > > Nevermind... I discovered the problem. It was in the Solaris Sun Studio > 12 compiler. I created a debug version to begin testing, but that > version worked without sucking up the cpu. So it looks like the > optimizer messed up. If I

Re: [Dovecot] Outlook 2000/2003 frequent disconnect issue

On Tue, 2007-07-31 at 17:12 -0700, Jeff Ramsey wrote: > I am now getting the following message on all Outlook Clients: > > "Your IMAP Server closed the connectionthis can occur if the > connection is idle for too long" What does Dovecot show in logs as the disconnect reason? This sounds li

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot won't build against recent version of GnuTLS

On Wed, 2007-08-01 at 16:09 +1200, Jasper Bryant-Greene wrote: > Does anyone know how much effort would be involved in making Dovecot > work with GNUTLS again? I need to deploy in an environment where using > OpenSSL is not possible. > > If I can get an indication of how close to a working state