-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
or just implement a webinterface that allows editing the values in the
DB and afterwards dumps a new vacation script for the user to disk
darix
+1 for the answer
my for personal use i do the same
Evaggelos Balaskas - http://ebalaskas.gr
On 7.12.2007, at 9.25, Eric Beda wrote:
1 NO Internal error occurred. Refer to server log for more
information.
[2007-12-07 12:51:56]
there are no errors reported in the log files related to that issue
for
both dovecot.log and maillog
There really should be an error logged. It just
On 7.12.2007, at 4.52, Joe Wong wrote:
Just tested with the latest build, no crash but also no fts result.
I found the following in the log:
..
Corrupted squat uidlist file
/mailfs/4/22/3/joewong99:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
Maildir/dovecot.index.search.uids:
Broken uidlists
dovecot: Dec 07
On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 11:05 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
dovecot: Dec 07 10:45:22 Error: IMAP(joewong99:joew.outblaze.com):
Corrupted squat uidlist file
..
What else do I missed? Mailbox and indexes are on NFS, is this the
cause
of the problem?
What OS do you use? Squat currently
151.189.12.245
i18n.kde.org
[snip]
Dec 7 14:19:26 [EMAIL PROTECTED]/tg3 dovecot: IMAP([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Corrupted transaction log file
/home/virtual/mydomain.com/home/peter.day/Maildir/.Trash/dovecot.index.log:
Append with UID 50, but next_uid = 15870
This is the real
On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 14:33 +, Daniel Watts wrote:
Following errors have happened quite a bit:
Dec 7 14:19:26 [EMAIL PROTECTED]/tg3 dovecot: IMAP([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Transaction log file
/home/virtual/mydomain.com/home/peter.day/Maildir/.Trash/dovecot.index.log:
marked corrupted
On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 09:24 -0500, Joe Allesi -X (joallesi - Coyote
Creek Consulting at Cisco) wrote:
Most likely you hit this threshold:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# cat /proc/sys/fs/file-max
380081
Check the current usage here:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# cat /proc/sys/fs/file-nr
21450
On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 11:23 +, Steve Heaven wrote:
This morning dovecot stopped allowing pop3 logins. In the logs I found
the messages below
Is there a config value for the max open files ?
Dec 7 10:00:22 frigga dovecot: execv(/usr/local/libexec/dovecot/pop3)
failed: Too many open
Following errors have happened quite a bit:
Dec 7 14:19:26 [EMAIL PROTECTED]/tg3 dovecot: IMAP([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Transaction log file
/home/virtual/mydomain.com/home/peter.day/Maildir/.Trash/dovecot.index.log:
marked corrupted
Dec 7 14:19:26 [EMAIL PROTECTED]/tg3 dovecot: IMAP([EMAIL
On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 09:24 -0500, Joe Allesi -X (joallesi - Coyote
Creek Consulting at Cisco) wrote:
Most likely you hit this threshold:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# cat /proc/sys/fs/file-max
380081
Check the current usage here:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# cat /proc/sys/fs/file-nr
21450
Most likely you hit this threshold:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# cat /proc/sys/fs/file-max
380081
Check the current usage here:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# cat /proc/sys/fs/file-nr
21450 380081
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Steve Heaven
[snip]
Dec 7 14:19:26 [EMAIL PROTECTED]/tg3 dovecot: IMAP([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Corrupted transaction log file
/home/virtual/mydomain.com/home/peter.day/Maildir/.Trash/dovecot.index.log:
Append with UID 50, but next_uid = 15870
This is the real error. What kind of a system do you
On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 16:38 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Change your ulimit or settings so that ulimit -n before starting
Dovecot gives a somewhat larger number than max_mail_processes +
login_max_processes_count.
OK, thanks
--
thorNET
Internet Services, Consultancy Training
This morning dovecot stopped allowing pop3 logins. In the logs I found
the messages below
Is there a config value for the max open files ?
Dec 7 10:00:22 frigga dovecot: execv(/usr/local/libexec/dovecot/pop3)
failed: Too many open files
Dec 7 10:01:14 frigga dovecot: pipe() failed: Too many
Nikolay Shopik schrieb:
On 04.12.2007 19:35, Götz Reinicke wrote:
Hi,
we do have a Voiceboxserver which forward recorded avi messages to the
mailserver account of users. I'v tested it for my account 10 minutes ago
and everything works.
Some users don't get the messages shown up in there
On 12/7/2007, Eric Beda ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
# dovecot --version
1.0.rc15
Also - this is really old - lots of changes in the released version...
You really should upgrade - or maybe wait until 1.1 goes gold, and then
upgrade - but do yourself a favor and do it soon.
--
Best regards,
On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 15:01 +, Daniel Watts wrote:
Shouldn't Dovecot be able to recover from this?
It does, that's why there are those marked corrupted errors. But it
probably does cause the current operation to fail. v1.1 handles this by
logging the error but continuing
Is dovecot the right choice for this problem?
I have a shared server with verio. I have one particular client that sends and
receives numerous large emails, and those emails were causing me to run out of
processes on my verio server, and basically slow things down a great deal due
to the
Bill,
There's a ringing endorsement of Verio. They told me that the server had
agroup mail file and all the users had their mail stored together. If I
installed Dovecot, they said it would split the mailboxes up into individual
files, and reduce the load on teh server, thus allowing it to
Quoting Johannes Berg [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I do think, however, that the two plugins could possibly converge.
I don't think they can converge, they work in very different ways,
since yours work at the IMAP level while mine works at the storage
level.
Actually, I work at storage level too now,
Quoting Johannes Berg [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
plugin {
(...)
pipe = /var/learn/%u/.spam:spamc -d some.host -L spam
pipe2 = /var/learn/%u/.ham:spamc -d some.host -L ham
(...)
And here I define that any message stored to /var/learn/%u/.spam where
%u is the username (that is learn.spam in
plugin {
(...)
pipe = /var/learn/%u/.spam:spamc -d some.host -L spam
pipe2 = /var/learn/%u/.ham:spamc -d some.host -L ham
(...)
And here I define that any message stored to /var/learn/%u/.spam where
%u is the username (that is learn.spam in the user's IMAP namespace) has
to be
At 11:56 AM -0600 12/7/07, Darren McLaughlin wrote:
Is dovecot the right choice for this problem?
I have a shared server with verio. I have one particular client
that sends and receives numerous large emails, and those emails were
causing me to run out of processes on my verio server, and
Oh. I missed that.
I had a look at your plugin, quite some time ago, and did not think
you would have modified it in such a way.
http://johannes.sipsolutions.net/Projects/dovecot-antispam
I should definitely give it a look; how to you figure out where the
mail comes from?
TBH, I
It certainly is a matter of taste, but that also was the reason why I
did not like your plugin... ;-)
Aha, but with what I proposed that becomes a matter of configuration,
hence my SPAM* rule in there.
Lastly, I'd prefer my user to make some explicit action to learn a
message rather
25 matches
Mail list logo
