Answer to self:
I did not set first_valid_uid explicitely. However:
"Valid UID range for users, defaults to 500 and above."
And mine is below that. Now everything works fine.
David
I have Dovecot 1.0.9 running right now and I'm looking to upgrade but at
the same time re-compile with SSL support. Dovecot's been working great
for me so far. When I try to compile I keep getting this at the end:
Building with SSL support ... : no
Building with IPv6 support ..
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I am trying to implement public folders on my Fedora 8 + Postfix 2.5.1 +
MySQL + Dovecot 1.0.13. I have Public folder shown in for my users but
when they choose the folder "Public" they receive the error "The mail
server responded: Mailbox doesn't ex
Hi all
My postfix/dovecot installation seems to be working fine - on the
machine. But I cannot connect from the outside by IMAP.
I am desperately searching for the reason of the following error:
bit:/var/log# telnet localhost imap
Trying 127.0.0.1...
Connected to localhost.
Escape character is '
ZyanKLee wrote:
hey,
in my dspam database there has been some odd behaviour:
during training dspam had created an uid entry named by the local part
of the email. i.e.:
user1
I use a virtual setup using dovecot, postfix and postfixadmin. On my
first try I set up a database for dspam itself
The correct way has to be one or the other:
http://wiki.dovecot.org/LDA/Exim
are mutually exclusive with
http://wiki.dovecot.org/HowTo/DebianStable
It appears that exim can either call dovecot's LDA or make the delivery itself. There may
be good reasons to do it one way or the other.
mouss wrote:
Karl Schmidt wrote:
mouss wrote:
karl wrote:
What would happen if I ran a script that did this:
mv ~/Maildir/.folder_one/cur/* ~/Maildir/.folder_two/cur/
My hunch is it might break things.
shouldn't break anything. if the MUA is caching "actions" (happens
with thunderbird at l
hey,
in my dspam database there has been some odd behaviour:
during training dspam had created an uid entry named by the local part
of the email. i.e.:
user1
I use a virtual setup using dovecot, postfix and postfixadmin. On my
first try I set up a database for dspam itself and there this ha
ML wrote:
Le 21 avr. 08 à 13:58, Johannes Berg a écrit :
On Mon, 2008-04-21 at 12:18 +0200, ML wrote:
I'm not a developper so I can't do it by myself,
# msgtag.spam
If this message was classified SPAM by mistake, please click here :
http://example.com/dspam-retrain.cgi?sig=
{DSPAM_SIG}
# m
Asheesh Laroia wrote:
On Mon, 21 Apr 2008, mouss wrote:
Karl Schmidt wrote:
mouss wrote:
karl wrote:
What would happen if I ran a script that did this:
mv ~/Maildir/.folder_one/cur/* ~/Maildir/.folder_two/cur/
My hunch is it might break things.
shouldn't break anything. if the MUA is cach
On Mon, 21 Apr 2008, mouss wrote:
Karl Schmidt wrote:
mouss wrote:
karl wrote:
What would happen if I ran a script that did this:
mv ~/Maildir/.folder_one/cur/* ~/Maildir/.folder_two/cur/
My hunch is it might break things.
shouldn't break anything. if the MUA is caching "actions" (happens
Karl Schmidt wrote:
mouss wrote:
karl wrote:
What would happen if I ran a script that did this:
mv ~/Maildir/.folder_one/cur/* ~/Maildir/.folder_two/cur/
My hunch is it might break things.
shouldn't break anything. if the MUA is caching "actions" (happens
with thunderbird at least), then th
On 4/21/2008 1:15 PM, Scott Silva wrote:
So - how hard would it be to make dovecot simply accept the last
defined setting read, instead of refusing to start?
That seems like a major change in function. To some admins it would be
like suddenly having to drive your car from the other side. Maybe
on 4-18-2008 3:43 AM Charles Marcus spake the following:
Hey Timo,
I was wondering how much trouble it would be to again emulate the way
postfix does something - in this case, the way it reads its config file
when starting up.
Current behavior:
Postfix:
If postfix encounters the same settin
mouss wrote:
karl wrote:
What would happen if I ran a script that did this:
mv ~/Maildir/.folder_one/cur/* ~/Maildir/.folder_two/cur/
My hunch is it might break things.
shouldn't break anything. if the MUA is caching "actions" (happens with
thunderbird at least), then the view in the client
ML wrote:
Le 21 avr. 08 à 12:49, Hugo Monteiro a écrit :
Never the less, it would be a nice idea, but i think you're
forgetting the technicalities. I assume that such http submission
would be authenticated. Do you want to nag your users constantly with
authentication popups, and windows o
Hi,
I'm using postfix with Dovecot 1.0.5 and getting the following errors
when a user moves a massive folders contents to trash (65000 or so
messages):
Apr 21 15:31:01 mink dovecot: IMAP([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Timeout while
waiting for lock for transaction log file
/virtual/store1/mail/d/dev2_alumina
Le 21 avr. 08 à 13:58, Johannes Berg a écrit :
On Mon, 2008-04-21 at 12:18 +0200, ML wrote:
I'm not a developper so I can't do it by myself,
# msgtag.spam
If this message was classified SPAM by mistake, please click here :
http://example.com/dspam-retrain.cgi?sig=
{DSPAM_SIG}
# msgtag.nonspa
Le 21 avr. 08 à 12:49, Hugo Monteiro a écrit :
Never the less, it would be a nice idea, but i think you're
forgetting the technicalities. I assume that such http submission
would be authenticated. Do you want to nag your users constantly
with authentication popups, and windows opening,
On Mon, 2008-04-21 at 12:18 +0200, ML wrote:
> I'm not a developper so I can't do it by myself,
> # msgtag.spam
> If this message was classified SPAM by mistake, please click here :
> http://example.com/dspam-retrain.cgi?sig=
> {DSPAM_SIG}
>
> # msgtag.nonspam
> If this message should have been
ML wrote:
I'm not a developper so I can't do it by myself, but I wonder if it
could be possible to use tagSpam and tagNospam DSPAM feature to ehance
user's dspam lerning experience. I even don't know if this must be
done by DSPAM itself or by dovecot, but let me explain :
The feature would be
I'm not a developper so I can't do it by myself, but I wonder if it
could be possible to use tagSpam and tagNospam DSPAM feature to ehance
user's dspam lerning experience. I even don't know if this must be
done by DSPAM itself or by dovecot, but let me explain :
The feature would be done by
> I've managed to get it working with the following patch.
> There may be a better way, deeper in the code, to do it. Timo or
> Johannes ... any sugestions?
>
> --- dovecot-antispam/mailtrain.c2008-04-19 22:20:32.0 +0100
> +++ dovecot-antispam-qmail/mailtrain.c 2008-04-19 22:25:
On Tue, 2008-04-22 at 23:05 +0200, Alexander Prinsier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The easiest way to do this seems to me is adapting the dspam backend of
> the antispam plugin to a generic "exec" backend, that calls some program.
In fact, there is such a backend, it's just called 'mailtrain'.
johannes
si
Le Fri, 18 Apr 2008 18:10:29 +0300
Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> écrit:
> On Apr 18, 2008, at 5:46 PM, Laurent Papier wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I have tested dovecot 1.1.rc4. I seems to works fine with my
> > configuration.
> >
> > I have also tested the downgrade from 1.1rc4 to 1.0.10. It seems to
Surely spam filtering/rejection should be done by the MTA, preferably during the
SMTP protocol conversation so as to prevent the black-holing of legitimate
e-mails (i.e. the sender doesn't know it's not been delivered) and the
prevention of joe-job collateral spamming?
It should also be noted
26 matches
Mail list logo
