Kenneth Porter wrote:
On Monday, May 19, 2008 9:43 PM -0400 Charles Marcus
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thats pretty drastic - I'd have a rebellion on my hands if I tried that
here.
The userbase is small, and I'd even be willing to set this up for one
user were that to happen. Most users
On Tue, 20 May 2008, mouss wrote:
Kenneth Porter wrote:
On Monday, May 19, 2008 9:43 PM -0400 Charles Marcus
Thats pretty drastic - I'd have a rebellion on my hands if I tried that
were that to happen. Most users aren't that sophisticated and aren't
creating folders in the first place.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 4 May 2008, Stephan Bosch wrote:
* Fixed bug that caused SASL mechanisms that require more than a
single client response to fail. Reported by Steffen Kaiser and
occured when he tried using the (obsolete) LOGIN mechanism.
Ancient :)
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Wed, 2008-05-14 at 12:29 +0200, Peter Eriksson wrote:
May 14 11:46:51 ifm.liu.se dovecot: [ID 107833 mail.error] IMAP(joher):
file maildir-uidlist.c: line 143: assertion failed: (UIDLIS
T_IS_LOCKED(uidlist))
If this still hapens with 1.0.13, it would help to get
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
with the current (2008-05-20) repository releases of Dovecot-1.0 and
antispam the plugin no longer compiles:
antispam-storage-1.0.c: In function âantispam_mail_update_keywordsâ:
antispam-storage-1.0.c:285: error: âidxkwd__typeâ undeclared
with the current (2008-05-20) repository releases of Dovecot-1.0 and
antispam the plugin no longer compiles:
antispam-storage-1.0.c: In function âantispam_mail_update_keywordsâ:
antispam-storage-1.0.c:285: error: âidxkwd__typeâ undeclared (first use in
this function)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 20 May 2008, Johannes Berg wrote:
Thanks for the reminder, Chris Boyle had sent me a bugfix for this a
week ago that I had so far neglected to apply, I have done that now.
Yep, it compiles, thanks!
- --
Steffen Kaiser
-BEGIN PGP
on 5-19-2008 4:07 PM Kenneth Porter spake the following:
Is there a straightforward way to disallow the deletion of all IMAP
mailboxes?
I have a user who's deleted an important IMAP mailbox and I'm now
recovering a recent copy from the backup. But I'd rather just blanket
disallow all folder
on 5-20-2008 6:43 AM Jacek Osiecki spake the following:
On Tue, 20 May 2008, mouss wrote:
Kenneth Porter wrote:
On Monday, May 19, 2008 9:43 PM -0400 Charles Marcus Thats pretty
drastic - I'd have a rebellion on my hands if I tried that
were that to happen. Most users aren't that
No core dump for now.
Core dump backtrace got now:
(dbx) where
[1] __lwp_kill(0x0, 0x6, 0x100082ee8, 0x19d4e0, 0x0, 0x0), at
0x7e9ceab8
[2] raise(0x6, 0x0, 0x, 0x7eae6000, 0x0, 0x0),
at 0x7e96b434
[3] abort(0x1, 0x1b8, 0x100082ee8, 0x19d4e0,
I want to know what the best way to run sieve filters on already
delivered mail is.
Problem is that I have a rather large unfiltered mailbox and filtering
it by hand would be a PITA.
I don't mind coding something up to do this, but I just don't think that
I'm the first one with this problem.
--On Tuesday, May 20, 2008 10:00:54 PM +0200 Axel Gembe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want to know what the best way to run sieve filters on already
delivered mail is.
RTFWiki! (http://wiki.dovecot.org/HowTo/RefilterMail)
Greetings,
Jens
Jens Dönhoff wrote:
RTFWiki! (http://wiki.dovecot.org/HowTo/RefilterMail)
Thank you!
I looked in the wiki for quite a long time, but it seems not long enough :\
- Axel
On Tuesday, May 20, 2008 8:39 AM -0700 Scott Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I usually make users wait a while before restoring their mistakes. A few
hours of thinking about it might make them think about it
Assuming it was a mistake. How long do you then wait in turn before he
gives you
14 matches
Mail list logo
