Charles Marcus wrote:
>> Jason Forester wrote:
>> We have 3 RH5.1 boxes running the stock Postfix 2.3.3, but due to issues
>> with the stock Dovecot 1.0rc15, Redhat supplied us with the version of
>> Dovecot 1.0.7 that will be in Redhat 5.2.
>>
>> The mail store is automounted per-user from a Sun
On 5/23/2008 5:21 PM, Carlos Williams wrote:
Thanks for the upgrade suggestion but I would like to think the error is due
to something besides my version just being old. Does the error make sense
and are you saying that if I had the latest version, this would not happen?
I'm saying 0.99 series
Charles Marcus wrote:
On 5/23/2008, Knute Johnson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>>> Any ideas what the problem is or how to fix it?
>> Output of dovecot -n?
>>
>> Any additional config parameters? No one here is a mind reader... ;)
> Well neither am I. Why didn't you tell me you wanted that
on 5-23-2008 2:21 PM Carlos Williams spake the following:
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 4:04 PM, Charles Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
One word... upgrade. This is ancient.
atrpms.net
Just be *sure* that you read the upgrade docs very carefully, as tnings
changed in the config...
http://wiki.d
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 4:04 PM, Charles Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> One word... upgrade. This is ancient.
>
> atrpms.net
>
> Just be *sure* that you read the upgrade docs very carefully, as tnings
> changed in the config...
>
> http://wiki.dovecot.org/Upgrading/1.0
>
> and if you decide
Zhang Huangbin wrote:
Hi, all.
I have OpenLDAP(+qmail.schema), Dovecot, Postfix installed on RHEL 5.1
(x86_64), and they works fine with mbox format.
The problem is if i set 'mailQuota=0' in LDAP, postfix can't send mail
to recipient user. But it works fine with 'mailQuota != 0', such as
'10240
Hi, all.
I have OpenLDAP(+qmail.schema), Dovecot, Postfix installed on RHEL 5.1
(x86_64), and they works fine with mbox format.
The problem is if i set 'mailQuota=0' in LDAP, postfix can't send mail
to recipient user. But it works fine with 'mailQuota != 0', such as
'10240'(10M).
What's wrong w
On 5/23/2008, Carlos Williams ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I am using dovecot-0.99.11-8.EL4
One word... upgrade. This is ancient.
atrpms.net
Just be *sure* that you read the upgrade docs very carefully, as tnings
changed in the config...
http://wiki.dovecot.org/Upgrading/1.0
and if you deci
I am using dovecot-0.99.11-8.EL4 on my system and decided to check the logs
since I just took over as the administrator on this system and I noticed the
same error entry over and over in the logs. I went to /var/log/dovecot.err
and see:
imap(rangry): May 22 13:33:31 Error: Error parsing IMAP envel
On 5/23/2008, Troy Engel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
...I think you missed the whole part of my original email that stated
this is a live, hard working server and "just trying things" is not
an option. I'm normally a just-push-the-button type of guy, but in
this case I need to get quantified evide
Charles Marcus wrote:
No, but there's no reason it wouldn't... a namespace is a namespace.
Easiest is to just try it...
...I think you missed the whole part of my original email that stated
this is a live, hard working server and "just trying things" is not an
option. I'm normally a just-pu
On 5/23/2008, Troy Engel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Can I add a second hidden namespace with no prefix:
Certainly...
http://wiki.dovecot.org/Namespaces
See, the wiki page has it backwards though of the way I need to do it; the
empty prefix namespace is the inbox = yes, not the hidden = ye
Charles Marcus wrote:
On 5/23/2008, Troy Engel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Can I add a second hidden namespace with no prefix:
Certainly...
http://wiki.dovecot.org/Namespaces
See, the wiki page has it backwards though of the way I need to do it;
the empty prefix namespace is the inbox = yes
On 5/23/2008, Troy Engel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Can I add a second hidden namespace with no prefix:
Certainly...
http://wiki.dovecot.org/Namespaces
--
Best regards,
Charles
On 5/23/2008, Knute Johnson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>>> Any ideas what the problem is or how to fix it?
>> Output of dovecot -n?
>>
>> Any additional config parameters? No one here is a mind reader... ;)
> Well neither am I. Why didn't you tell me you wanted that before I
> posted.
No offen
On Friday, May 23, 2008 10:38 AM -0700 "Daniel L. Miller"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This actually may have a real benefit to some specialty folders - such as
junk/nojunk folders that are looked for by a scanning re-classifier. Can
you give an example of how to make...Inbox/Junk non-deletable
(apologies if this has been covered, can't find it on the Wiki/FAQ, etc.)
We have a stellar, fantastic, hard working Dovecot 1.0.5 (yes, I need to
upgrade) installation running in Courier-IMAP compatibility mode:
mail_location = maildir:~/Maildir:INDEX=/var/spool/dovecot/indexes/%1u/%u
na
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On May 20, 2008, at 2:07 AM, Kenneth Porter wrote:
Is there a straightforward way to disallow the deletion of all IMAP
mailboxes?
I have a user who's deleted an important IMAP mailbox and I'm now
recovering a recent copy from the backup. But I'd rather just blanket
disa
Charles Marcus wrote:
On 5/22/2008, Knute Johnson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Any ideas what the problem is or how to fix it?
Output of dovecot -n?
Any additional config parameters? No one here is a mind reader... ;)
Well neither am I. Why didn't you tell me you wanted that before I posted
I've moved again. If you need to know my new address, whois
imapwiki.org (dovecot.org address is still lagging behind). My living
costs also increased some because of this, but hopefully I'll get
enough money from Dovecot coding to pay for it. :)
I'll try to get back to replying mails withi
On 5/22/2008, Knute Johnson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Any ideas what the problem is or how to fix it?
Output of dovecot -n?
Any additional config parameters? No one here is a mind reader... ;)
--
Best regards,
Charles
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> Right, that helped me to reproduce it. Fixed:
> http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.1/rev/cb1c6c942768
Hi again.
That fixed my testcase as well, but now I just got another report of a
mail with an epoch date.
It turns out that I can still get in trouble if running the
send_fe
> Somehow I don't think "usr/bin/krb5-config: Unknown option `gssapi' --
> use `--help' for usage" is a valid C compiler option. :-)
I've been looking at the configure code in an attempt to fix this. It
feels a bit "kludgy". First stepI think should be to modify the
code in "configure.in" on line
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 7:09 PM, Charles Marcus
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/22/2008, Osvaldo Alvarez Pozo ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>>
>> my config is as follow
>
> logs?
>
> --
>
> Best regards,
>
> Charles
>
there is no logs , the macs sends nothing
24 matches
Mail list logo
