Hello, please excuse my asking a question about simple configuration rather
than something about a suspected bug or other detailed enquiry.
I've set up dovecot (1.0.13, from http://www.blastwave.org) and when
Thunderbird connects to it, all is well and I see folders as expected. When
MacOS X m
I think the problem is in these few lines:
dovecot: Jul 15 18:13:21 Info: IMAP(01234567g): fs quota add storage dir
= /home/h1/sc/01234567g/mail
dovecot: Jul 15 18:13:21 Info: IMAP(01234567g): fs quota block device =
homesvr:/h1
dovecot: Jul 15 18:13:21 Info: IMAP(
Jack Stewart wrote:
Zhang Huangbin wrote:
Daniel L. Miller wrote:
Zhang Huangbin wrote:
Hi, all.
I just upgrade from 1.0.15 to 1.1.1 in a test box(RHEL 5.2, x86_64).
after upgrade, i got this warning msg:
8<
# /etc/init.d/dovecot restart
Stopping Dovecot Imap:
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Tue, 2008-07-15 at 14:57 -0400, Adam McDougall wrote:
A user alerted me to a problem when he renamed an upper level mail
folder and lost access to a lower level folder under it.
I tried with and without listescape, it didn't seem to make a
difference, and I saw no e
Hi,
On Tuesday, 15. July 2008, mouss wrote:
> Tom Fernandes wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I currently use procmail without the deliver LDA but would like to switch
> > to using deliver. I also would like to get away from procmail for various
> > reasons. Otherwise I could use the procmail-patch from
>
On Tue, 2008-07-15 at 14:57 -0400, Adam McDougall wrote:
> A user alerted me to a problem when he renamed an upper level mail
> folder and lost access to a lower level folder under it.
>
> I tried with and without listescape, it didn't seem to make a
> difference, and I saw no errors in the dove
A user alerted me to a problem when he renamed an upper level mail
folder and lost access to a lower level folder under it.
I tried with and without listescape, it didn't seem to make a
difference, and I saw no errors in the dovecot log.
Symptoms are if a client has a maildir folder tree .a a
Charles Marcus escreveu:
On 7/15/2008, Ed W ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Thunderbird is also appalling with attachments, downloading the whole
message once so that you can read the few KB of text, then
downloading the whole message AGAIN when you open up the
attachment... Durr.
I don't see it do
Hi,
thanks for your mail :)
Right. Dovecot creates such a "DO NOT DELETE" mail just as UW-IMAP/
Pine does. It's created when all messages from the mbox get deleted,
so that UIDVALIDITY and NEXT-UID fields can be stored (without relying
on them staying in index files).
But these messages should
On 7/15/2008, Ed W ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Thunderbird is also appalling with attachments, downloading the whole
message once so that you can read the few KB of text, then
downloading the whole message AGAIN when you open up the
attachment... Durr.
I don't see it doing that... are you sure?
I don't think Outlook or OE has the capability to store its "work folders"
out
of its local mailroot. AFAIR you have to write message rules to move it.
OE does. In the server configuration options you can select to save Drafts,
Sent Items, and Deleted Items on the server. It then lets y
I can't help you with this messages
> dovecot: Jul 15 18:13:21 Error: IMAP(01234567g): fcntl(0, F_GETFL)
> failed: Bad file number
> dovecot: Jul 15 18:13:21 Fatal: IMAP(01234567g): fd_set_nonblock(0)
> failed: Bad file number
It seems that they are produced by "int fd_set_nonblock(int fd, bool
On Sat, July 12, 2008 13:29, Robert Schetterer wrote:
> i dont wanna use dict , i only wanna use the qutoas out of sql crated by
> postfixadmin
>
> has someone used this ever ?
driver = mysql
connect = host=localhost dbname=postfix user=postfix password=password
default_pass_scheme = MD5-CRYPT
p
So my understanding for now is this:
/var/mail
-
* has quotas
* for mailboxes hosted by this file system 'getrootquota' should
report used/total quota sizes.
/home/h1
* has or has not quotas. This is the same, because if 'homesvr'
doesn't support rquota, you
Tom Fernandes wrote:
Hello,
I currently use procmail without the deliver LDA but would like to switch to
using deliver. I also would like to get away from procmail for various
reasons. Otherwise I could use the procmail-patch from
http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/2006-July/014656.html
15 matches
Mail list logo
