Good morning list,
first of all: dovecot works really great, the performance is
overwhelming (especially compared to courier), the configuration
flexible as hell, it is good documented - I love this software.
But as things get complicated, I think I need some additional help.
I'm using do
Well bust my buttons! Thanks, Timo! FUNCTIONING! Let Postfix figure out
the proper user. BTW, my 'deliver' is set to 755. Nothing special.
> I'm not all that good with Postfix configuration, but:
Clearly quite good enough.
> On Tue, 2009-04-14 at 13:05 -0700, James Butler wrote:
>> ## POSTFIX CO
Caution: drifting OT :)
On Wed, 2009-04-15 at 08:16, James Butler wrote:
> MailScanner is slowly in the process of being attempted, even though it is
> simply a wrapper that accepts the mail from Postfix then pipes it over to
> Spamassassin and other programs like AV apps. When I received your
>
I'm not all that good with Postfix configuration, but:
On Tue, 2009-04-14 at 13:05 -0700, James Butler wrote:
> ## POSTFIX CONFIG ##
>
> /etc/postfix/main.cf:
>
> mailbox_transport = spamassassin
Remove this.
> /etc/postfix/master.cf:
>
> spamassassin unix - n n - - pipe
> user=spam:dovecot
> On Wed, 2009-04-15 at 07:52, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>
>
>> Perhaps you shouldn't be using the pipe at all. Maybe you should just
>> put the command to mailbox_command and have it do all the work? Then
>> there's no need to worry about things like setuid-roots or whatever.
>
>
> Given what his conf
On Wed, 2009-04-15 at 07:52, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> Perhaps you shouldn't be using the pipe at all. Maybe you should just
> put the command to mailbox_command and have it do all the work? Then
> there's no need to worry about things like setuid-roots or whatever.
Given what his conf showed befo
Please take a look at my post from 1:05PM today with all of my
configuration information. Is the problem being caused by something there?
I have been working on this for over two weeks, and I have no idea what's
what, anymore.
Now I DO understand that it's either setuid-root deliver and use -d fro
On Tue, 2009-04-14 at 14:17 -0700, James Butler wrote:
> Oh, that was fun.
>
> Making the change below resulted in mail getting deferred with "Fatal:
> destination user parameter (-d user) not given" ... which apparently is
> caused by running deliver as 'root'!
I thought you wanted to use -d? Th
Oh, that was fun.
Making the change below resulted in mail getting deferred with "Fatal:
destination user parameter (-d user) not given" ... which apparently is
caused by running deliver as 'root'!
(http://archive.netbsd.se/?ml=dovecot-general&a=2008-02&t=6558196)
So I am back to:
-rwxr-xr-x 1 r
On Tue, 2009-04-14 at 13:15 -0700, James Butler wrote:
> I have changed /usr/local/libexec/dovecot/deliver permissions as follows:
>
> -rwsr-s--- 1 root dovecot 4044835 2009-04-03 13:52 deliver
>
> Because of message returned to 'sen...@example-send.com':
>
> "local configuration error. Command
On Tue, 2009-04-14 at 13:04 -0700, James Butler wrote:
> Is this saying that Dovecot is designed for a mail system with only ONE
> UID, and that systems with MANY UIDs are exceptions?? I don't think so ...
deliver is kind of tricky with multiple UIDs. Then it needs to be
started as root, either di
I have changed /usr/local/libexec/dovecot/deliver permissions as follows:
-rwsr-s--- 1 root dovecot 4044835 2009-04-03 13:52 deliver
Because of message returned to 'sen...@example-send.com':
"local configuration error. Command output:
/usr/local/libexec/dovecot/deliver must not be both world-exe
Here is everything I could think of that might pertain to this, as
currently configured on my dedicated server. It's all fresh! :)
## SYSTEM ##
Fedora 10
Postfix 2.55
Dovecot 1.2.rc2
Spamassassin 3.2.5
SELinux (no SELinux restrictions. Testing done with SELinux=permissive.)
SASLAuthd (not requir
Thank you for your continued attention, Timo.
> On Tue, 2009-04-14 at 10:22 -0700, James Butler wrote:
>> > On Mon, 2009-04-13 at 15:48 -0700, James Butler wrote:
>> >> 1) User 'spam:dovecot' runs Smapassassin
>> >> 2) Hands off to deliver (root:dovecot)
>> >
>> > Have you set up some kind of setu
On Tue, 2009-04-14 at 10:22 -0700, James Butler wrote:
> > On Mon, 2009-04-13 at 15:48 -0700, James Butler wrote:
> >> 1) User 'spam:dovecot' runs Smapassassin
> >> 2) Hands off to deliver (root:dovecot)
> >
> > Have you set up some kind of setuid-root deliver, or why is it running
> > as root:dove
i've seen a fair number of people download my tool. anyone having
problems? suggestions? I'll upload it to the wiki if there is no major
outcry here.
> On Mon, 2009-04-13 at 15:48 -0700, James Butler wrote:
>> 1) User 'spam:dovecot' runs Smapassassin
>> 2) Hands off to deliver (root:dovecot)
>
> Have you set up some kind of setuid-root deliver, or why is it running
> as root:dovecot here instead of spam:dovecot?
I have no idea how it is running
Hi,
I'm currently using courier-imap, Maildir files.
Do I need to run conversion, or can I simply let dovecot run and create its
own indexing without attempting to convert anything from courier?
Ricardo
18 matches
Mail list logo
