Timo Sirainen wrote on 20 Oct 2009 18:53:
> On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 21:13 +0200, Frank Behrens wrote:
> > When Timo introduced this feature
> > (http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2007-September/025813.html)
> > it was possible to hand over only the detail part. In my sendmail
> > configuration I
On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 21:13 +0200, Frank Behrens wrote:
> When Timo introduced this feature
> (http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2007-September/025813.html)
> it was possible to hand over only the detail part. In my sendmail
> configuration I used "-a +$h",
> where $h contains the detail part a
Good afternoon again
I was thinking about the Dovecot upgrading so i´m doing this in the next
hours. in the other hand here i show you the dovecot-ldap.conf file I
think it has just the necessary options to bind the LDAP server.
/hosts = *
base = ou=People,o=*,o=**
ldap_versio
Thanks Timo
> From: t...@iki.fi
> To: jolumape...@hotmail.com
> Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 16:46:52 -0400
> CC: dovecot@dovecot.org
> Subject: Re: [Dovecot] Expire plugin per domain
>
> On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 15:43 -0500, Jose Luis Marin Perez wrote:
> > DOMAIN=`echo $VPOPUSER|sed s/^.*@//`
> ..
> >
On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 15:43 -0500, Jose Luis Marin Perez wrote:
> DOMAIN=`echo $VPOPUSER|sed s/^.*@//`
..
> > > vchkpw-wrapper.sh does, except since it doesn't call vchkpw
> itself,
> > > it'll need to get the username from $USER instead of $VPOPUSER.
> > >
The above explains the first problem...
Hi Timo,
I copied vchkpw-wrapper.sh as userdb.sh, being as follows:
userdb.sh
#!/bin/bash
DOMAIN=`echo $VPOPUSER|sed s/^.*@//`
if [ "$DOMAIN" = "operaciones.qnet.com.pe" ]; then
export USERDB_AUTOCREATE=INBOX.Spam
export USERDB_AUTOSUBSCRIBE=INBOX.Spam
export USERDB_EXPIRE="INBOX.Spam 1
On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 10:00 -0500, Jose Luis Marin Perez wrote:
> My problem is that I have no idea how to create the userdb.sh
From my previous mail:
> Then create /usr/local/bin/userdb.sh which does more or less what the
> vchkpw-wrapper.sh does, except since it doesn't call vchkpw itself,
>
On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 17:10 +0200, Michal Hlavinka wrote:
> On Tuesday 13 October 2009 19:10:15 Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > On Tue, 2009-10-13 at 17:26 +0200, Michal Hlavinka wrote:
> > > would it be possible to:
> > > a) send content of imap_capability in greeting message? It should be
> > > user's r
Quoting Timo Sirainen :
On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 15:38 -0400, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 13:34 -0600, Michael M. Slusarz wrote:
> Hmmm... Rebuilt with the latest 1.2.7-pre code yesterday, and I am
> still seeing this (on at least 2 different mailboxes in the last day):
>
> Oct 20 1
On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 15:38 -0400, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 13:34 -0600, Michael M. Slusarz wrote:
> > Hmmm... Rebuilt with the latest 1.2.7-pre code yesterday, and I am
> > still seeing this (on at least 2 different mailboxes in the last day):
> >
> > Oct 20 13:23:32 bigworm
Timo, you test program runs fine on MacOSX 10.5.8 (Darwin Kernel
Version 9.8.0)
On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 13:34 -0600, Michael M. Slusarz wrote:
> Hmmm... Rebuilt with the latest 1.2.7-pre code yesterday, and I am
> still seeing this (on at least 2 different mailboxes in the last day):
>
> Oct 20 13:23:32 bigworm dovecot: IMAP(slusarz): Panic: file
> imap-fetch.c: line 2
> 27
Quoting Timo Sirainen :
On Fri, 2009-10-09 at 12:56 -0600, Michael M. Slusarz wrote:
Oct 9 12:49:30 bigworm EXT(slusarz): : Panic: file imap-fetch.c: line
227 (get_expunges_fallback): assertion failed: (mail->uid > next_uid)
But the crash is anyway now fixed:
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1
When I upgraded my old, long running dovecot 1.1 to newer dovecot-1.2.4 +
doevecot-sieve-
0.1.12 I observed a change in destination address (-a) parsing.
Old behaviour:
When Timo introduced this feature
(http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2007-September/025813.html)
it was possible to hand over
On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 14:52 -0400, Bill Cole wrote:
> > And also: I think (guess) that behavior is required by POSIX, but it
> > would be nice if someone could verify that. :) The behavior being:
> > seeking in a fd is affects all processes that have the same fd open.
> > (Simple IPC, yay.)
>
> As
Timo Sirainen wrote, On 10/19/09 6:11 PM:
On Mon, 2009-10-19 at 17:55 -0400, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Can someone find an OS where the attached program doesn't work? It
should print "success". So far tested for success: Linux 2.6, Solaris
10, FreeBSD 7.2, OpenBSD 4.2.
And also: I think (guess) tha
Quoting dove...@corwyn.net:
As I look at upgrading the mail server, I'd like to change to a
higher availability configuration (where the server can fail and I
don't have to reconfig my imap users).
Sounds like a great plan!
For the SMTP that's easy, because I can use multiple MX records, a
On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 18:48 +0100, Gavin Hamill wrote:
> If we go down that road, we'll probably need at least two seperate
> inputs, one for the alias-normalised, and one for the publicly
> advertised email address.
>
> Hence, when the autoreply is generated, it comes from
> rather than
> or wh
On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 12:28 -0400, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 17:34 +0200, Stephan Bosch wrote:
> > 6) Adjust Deliver/Sieve to accept the original recipient as a separate
> > parameter.
>
> I think more like "alias-normalized recipient" or something like that,
> since "original
On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 08:03 -0400, B. Cook wrote:
> Now what does not show here is something that I put in that it looked
> like it was supposed to help but didn't..
>
> mailbox_idle_check_interval = 30
This is the default already. And changing it has almost zero effect if
you built Dovecot with
On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 12:15 -0500, Juan Felipe Estrada wrote:
> /# 1.0.7: /etc/dovecot.conf
Like Andreas said, this is an old version. There have been a lot of LDAP
fixes in v1.1, so upgrading is likely to help.
> passdb:
> driver: ldap
> args: /etc/dovecot-ldap.conf
> passdb:
> d
On Tuesday 20 October 2009 19:15:35 Juan Felipe Estrada wrote:
> Good Afternoon
>
> I´m really new at this and i don´t know if i´m posting at the right
> place.
>
> My problem is that our Dovecot IMAP is stopping from time to time
> with no info in the log, i just realize about this when our suppor
Hmm, I haven't had any issues with BIS or BES users. But I checked my
config and I have:
mailbox_idle_check_interval = 120
I did that for other purposes, guess that just fixed it for me, before
bis ever started using the idle command.
Quoting "B. Cook" :
Ever since Columbus day things hav
Good Afternoon
I´m really new at this and i don´t know if i´m posting at the right place.
My problem is that our Dovecot IMAP is stopping from time to time with
no info in the log, i just realize about this when our support person
call me saying that the whatsup monitor is showing the IMAP4 pr
On Tuesday 20 October 2009 18:57:48 Marc Perkel wrote:
> Thank you all for your help on this. I'll probably try it tonight
> when most people will be off line and hopefully it won't be down
> long. Everything already is lower case so that shouldn't be an issue.
Another suggestion, a little off-top
On Tuesday 20 October 2009 18:49:16 Jerry wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 17:57:35 +0200
>
> Andreas Ntaflos wrote:
> > On Tuesday 20 October 2009 17:07:49 Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > > On Oct 20, 2009, at 9:45 AM, Andreas Ntaflos wrote:
> > > > I'd say you need a static userdb. Something like this:
> >
Thank you all for your help on this. I'll probably try it tonight when
most people will be off line and hopefully it won't be down long.
Everything already is lower case so that shouldn't be an issue.
On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 17:57:35 +0200
Andreas Ntaflos wrote:
> On Tuesday 20 October 2009 17:07:49 Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > On Oct 20, 2009, at 9:45 AM, Andreas Ntaflos wrote:
> > > I'd say you need a static userdb. Something like this:
> >
> > A couple of small things:
> > > passdb sql {
> > > args
On Tuesday 20 October 2009 17:57:35 Andreas Ntaflos wrote:
> On Tuesday 20 October 2009 17:07:49 Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > On Oct 20, 2009, at 9:45 AM, Andreas Ntaflos wrote:
> > > I'd say you need a static userdb. Something like this:
> >
> > A couple of small things:
> > > passdb sql {
> > > args
On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 17:57 +0200, Andreas Ntaflos wrote:
> > > password_query = SELECT password FROM view_users WHERE email='%u';
> >
> > SELECT password, email AS user FROM ..
> >
> > changes username to same case as it's in the database (so lowercase
> > probably) and there's no need to use %L a
On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 17:34 +0200, Stephan Bosch wrote:
> 6) Adjust Deliver/Sieve to accept the original recipient as a separate
> parameter.
I think more like "alias-normalized recipient" or something like that,
since "original recipient" would be what -a parameter does and that
doesn't really h
On 10/19/09 4:55 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> Can someone find an OS where the attached program doesn't work? It
> should print "success". So far tested for success: Linux 2.6, Solaris
> 10, FreeBSD 7.2, OpenBSD 4.2.
>
Success on OS X 10.6.1 (Darwin kernel 10.0)
Ever since Columbus day things have been strange with my two dovecot
servers, according to my Blackberry users.
We do not have a BES just the standard BIS that comes with a personal
account.
Several people have told me that since that Monday that they get
occasional duplicate copies of messa
Hi!
I'm currently running Dovecot 1.1.8 on a HP server using CentOS 5.2
as my IMAP server, receiving mail from postfix, and also using
squirrelmail as the frontend.
As I look at upgrading the mail server, I'd like to change to a
higher availability configuration (where the server can fail
On Tuesday 20 October 2009 17:07:49 Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Oct 20, 2009, at 9:45 AM, Andreas Ntaflos wrote:
> > I'd say you need a static userdb. Something like this:
>
> A couple of small things:
> > passdb sql {
> > args = /etc/dovecot/dovecot-sql.conf
> > }
> >
> > userdb static {
> > args =
Peter Borg wrote:
I find it really hard to believe that Gavin and I are the only ones to hit
this issue. That said I've probably been hacking at this particular system
too long and am missing something very obvious!
You're definitely not the only one. Finding a good solution is difficult
ho
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 11:46:22PM -0400, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Oct 19, 2009, at 5:55 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>
> >Can someone find an OS where the attached program doesn't work? It
> >should print "success". So far tested for success: Linux 2.6, Solaris
> >10, FreeBSD 7.2, OpenBSD 4.2.
>
>
no chance to install at the moment another mailclient on the Pre, there
is simple none available.
I read the some about it, but with also different opinions. Sometimes
goes, somtimes no.
So i thought i give it a try.
So i'll see how far i come with it.
Maybe you can take a look the the Nokia
On Tuesday 13 October 2009 19:10:15 Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-10-13 at 17:26 +0200, Michal Hlavinka wrote:
> > would it be possible to:
> > a) send content of imap_capability in greeting message? It should be
> > user's responsibility if it's set to something "weird"
>
> I guess I could
On Oct 20, 2009, at 9:45 AM, Andreas Ntaflos wrote:
I'd say you need a static userdb. Something like this:
A couple of small things:
passdb sql {
args = /etc/dovecot/dovecot-sql.conf
}
userdb static {
args = uid=vmail gid=vmail home=/var/vmail/%Ld/%Ln allow_all_users=yes
}
%Ld/%Ln at this
On Oct 20, 2009, at 10:04 AM, Rami Rami wrote:
After using the "courier-dovecot-migrate.pl" script users using pop3
are
re-downloading their old emails as duplicates.
This issue is resolved by replacing :
maildir:~/Maildir:INDEX=/tmp/QUOTA/index/%u:CONTROL=/tmp/QUOTA/
control/%u
Don't put c
Dear Timo thank you for the help your giving me these.
I want to set expire plugin only for some domains in the same way I set
autocreate plugin.
vchkpw-wrapper.sh
#!/bin/bash
DOMAIN=`echo $VPOPUSER|sed s/^.*@//`
echo $USER > /tmp/autocreate
echo $DOMAIN >> /tmp/autocreate
if [ "$DO
On Oct 20, 2009, at 10:04 AM, Rami Rami wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to migrate users form courier to dovecot 1.2.6.
The main configuration parameters are as follows :
--
# 1.2.6: /usr/local/etc/dov
On Oct 20, 2009, at 10:42 AM, Michal Hlavinka wrote:
On Monday 19 October 2009 23:55:20 Timo Sirainen wrote:
Can someone find an OS where the attached program doesn't work? It
should print "success". So far tested for success: Linux 2.6, Solaris
10, FreeBSD 7.2, OpenBSD 4.2.
on Fedora 11 (Lin
On Monday 19 October 2009 23:55:20 Timo Sirainen wrote:
> Can someone find an OS where the attached program doesn't work? It
> should print "success". So far tested for success: Linux 2.6, Solaris
> 10, FreeBSD 7.2, OpenBSD 4.2.
>
on Fedora 11 (Linux 2.6.30.9 64bit) it failed 3 times (of 200 runs)
On 10/20/2009 11:25 AM Ralf Becker wrote:
> Testing all again multiple times
> …
Hm, running multiple times shows some problems (on Linux).
Linux | OpenBSD | FreeBSD
2.6.30-2 amd64 | 4.2 GENERIC i386 | 7.2-RELEASE i386
-- +--+-
Hello,
I am trying to migrate users form courier to dovecot 1.2.6.
The main configuration parameters are as follows :
--
# 1.2.6: /usr/local/etc/dovecot.conf
Warning: fd limit 1024 is lower than what
On Monday 19 October 2009 19:13:36 Marc Perkel wrote:
> Excuse me for being stupid and confused.
>
> I'm trying to convert my dovecot install from passwd-file to mysql. I
> have a single table called "users" that has 3 fields, user_name,
> domain_name and password. The data came from passwd/shadow
Ingo Thierack schrieb:
> Hello,
>
> i try to understand, how it works (IDLE).
> Try to get it successfully work with my new Palm Pre ;-)
> which looks like to have a lot issues wir imap... so i'll blame not dovecot
As far i read about palm pre , its imap app is terrible
therfore , simple advise d
Hallo.
In our dovecot 1.2.6 server running under Solaris 9 I would like to set up a
second quota root because the mail folders are in the users home directories and
the inboxes of all users are in /var/mail. As soon as I add
quota2 = fs:INBOX:noenforcing:mount=/var/mail
the imap client crashes
> touch foo
> tail -f foo&
> rm -f foo
> fg
>
> Does it complain about stale NFS handle?
On NetBSD, it doesn't complain.
I'm somewhat astonished that FreeBSD does complain. I thought those .nfsX
entries (which cover exactly this situation) were an original 4.4BSD invention.
> Success on NetBSD 5.0_STABLE on amd64 (64-bit).
Also on 3.1.0_PATCH/i386, 3.0.1/sparc and 4.0.1/{amd64,i386}
Le 19 oct. 2009 à 22:55, Timo Sirainen a écrit :
Can someone find an OS where the attached program doesn't work? It
should print "success". So far tested for success: Linux 2.6, Solaris
10, FreeBSD 7.2, OpenBSD 4.2.
Succeeds here on Mac OS X 10.6.1, with gcc version 4.2.1 (Apple Inc.
build
Gavin wrote:
> Postfix receives mails in firstname.lastn...@domain.com format, and does
> an LDAP lookup to Active Directory to determine the 'flastname'
> login-name format (for delivery to /home/AD/flastname/Maildir/).
>
> It would then seem that we'd need a method to do a reverse lookup at
> Dov
Hello
Debian:
$ uname -a
Linux gaa 2.6.30-2-686 #1 SMP Sat Sep 26 01:16:22 UTC 2009 i686 GNU/Linux
$ gcc -o test -Wall test.c
$ ./test
failed: 2. offset=2
> Can someone find an OS where the attached program doesn't work? It
> should print "success". So far tested for success: Linux 2.6, Solaris
Timo Sirainen wrote:
Can someone find an OS where the attached program doesn't work? It
should print "success". So far tested for success: Linux 2.6, Solaris
10, FreeBSD 7.2, OpenBSD 4.2.
uname -a
HP-UX delta B.11.11 U 9000/800 109434696 unlimited-user license
aCC -c -DHP_UX -v +O2 test.c
Testing all again multiple times
System | Kernel | x out of 100 failed with
| x Bit | "failed: 2. offset=2"
++
AIX 5300-08 | 64 | 0 (!)
AIX 5300-08 | 32 | 69
AIX 5300-03 | 64 | 81
AIX 5200-06 | 64 | 9
AIX 5100-
Timo Sirainen:
> I'm still interested in HP-UX, AIX and Cygwin results. Maybe in Cygwin
> it could be broken, but then again I don't really care about Cygwin.
On Cygwin 1.7 (the version currently under development) it works:
$ uname -a
CYGWIN_NT-5.1 sauron 1.7.0(0.214/5/3) 2009-10-03 14:33 i68
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 12:42:08PM -0400, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Thanks for the answers Timo,
I understand random redirect is not a good idea but I'm trying to evaluate the
damage it can do.
> If you do it, you'll most likely see some random index related errors.
But are index related errors reco
That's weird.. Did you run it a couple of times on the failed ones?
On Oct 20, 2009, at 4:31 AM, Ralf Becker wrote:
Success on
AIX 5300-08
AIX 5300-06
AIX 5200-06
AIX 5100-00
AIX 4330-11
Failed on
AIX 5300-03 failed: 2. offset=2
AIX 4330-10 failed: 2. offset=2
Timo Sirainen schrieb
Success on
AIX 5300-08
AIX 5300-06
AIX 5200-06
AIX 5100-00
AIX 4330-11
Failed on
AIX 5300-03 failed: 2. offset=2
AIX 4330-10 failed: 2. offset=2
Timo Sirainen schrieb am 19.10.2009 23:55:
> Can someone find an OS where the attached program doesn't work? It
> should print "success". So
Success on
CYGWIN_NT-5.1 XX 1.5.25(0.156/4/2) 2008-06-12 19:34 i686 Cygwin
Timo Sirainen schrieb am 19.10.2009 23:55:
> Can someone find an OS where the attached program doesn't work? It
> should print "success". So far tested for success: Linux 2.6, Solaris
> 10, FreeBSD 7.2, OpenBSD 4.2.
>
On Monday 19 October 2009 23.55.20 Timo Sirainen wrote:
> Can someone find an OS where the attached program doesn't work? It
> should print "success". So far tested for success: Linux 2.6, Solaris
> 10, FreeBSD 7.2, OpenBSD 4.2.
"success" on OpenBSD 4.5 and 4.6 and -current.
Daniel
--
LÉVAI Dá
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 05:55:20PM -0400, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> Can someone find an OS where the attached program doesn't work? It
> should print "success". So far tested for success: Linux 2.6, Solaris
> 10, FreeBSD 7.2, OpenBSD 4.2.
Success on NetBSD 5.0_STABLE on amd64 (64-bit).
Ge
64 matches
Mail list logo
