I sent this a while ago, but got no answers. Maybe it got lost?
Thanks!
Rick
Rick Thomas wrote:
Is there any way to tell dovecot to listen for imap/imaps requests on
all interfaces on multiple separate ports?
For example, can I do this:
protocol imap {
listen = *:10143
list
Le 09-Jan-10 20:29, Stephan Bosch a écrit :
I thought this would be an excellent opportunity to test the new
Pigeonhole plugin support and also to do something interesting with the
namespace functionality of the variables extension. That is why I gave
this a short look, which promptly resulted i
Hi guys,
Thanks for the great product. We've used dovecot for ages as our
internal mail server and it works great!
I've recently started using fetchmail 6.3.9 (with IDLE enabled) to
download mail from our ISP (Pair networks). The ISP is running Dovecot
1.1.16. I am unable to get the info
(as a reply to your mail)
I'm not subscribed to the mailing list, but I just read your thread
regarding this plugin.
It seems to me that the Shift-Delete function you are referring to
in Thunderbird just bypasses the built-in move-to-trash-on-delete
function, but on the server-side is identical
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 09:02:25AM -0500, Stewart Dean wrote:
> My apologies for posting this to the list; I meant to send it
> Timo only
>
> >Now that you're back in your native land. .
> >If and only if you're interested, I'D be interested in hearing
> >what you thought of America
Nonet
Ditto,
Especially from a Finn :-)
I've worked with scandinavians (Finns, Norwegians, Swedes) in the past.
Swedes and Finns in particular are interesting people, the way they
think and so on.
Brilliant people too.. With quite an attitude towards life, work etc.
Norwegians are party animals :-)
Bu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 11 Jan 2010, Alexander Chekalin wrote:
Yes, I'm trying to make some backup solution.
The idea was to have two identical (well, nearly identical) servers with the
same software and data on them, and while the first do its job as SMTP and
P
So I'd better wait for dsync? Or I can get it (without iterate code) now
somehow?
11.01.2010 16:54, Timo Sirainen пишет:
On 11.1.2010, at 16.46, Mario Antonio wrote:
With v2.0 dsync would be great for this..
How could dsync beat rsync?
With just one rsync command you can replicate the whole
v2.0 is still in beta. I should release second beta sometimes soon, but I'm a
bit too busy / internetless currently. I'm anyway using the latest hg for my
own mails, so it's not completely broken, but I wouldn't necessarily recomment
it for larger installations..
On 11.1.2010, at 16.45, Alexand
On 11.1.2010, at 16.46, Mario Antonio wrote:
>> With v2.0 dsync would be great for this..
>
> How could dsync beat rsync?
> With just one rsync command you can replicate the whole mail store (a root
> folder)
> Can you do the same with Dsync? or Do you have to write a script that feeds
> Domai
Timo,
I'd really love to but I'm really not sure in my code skills to patch
such a sw as Dovecot.
11.01.2010 16:42, Timo Sirainen пишет:
On 11.1.2010, at 16.41, Alexander Chekalin wrote:
In fact I just try to understand if Dovecot's behaviour is right and my
expectations are wrong, or vis
No of course it won't. But dsync seems to be a solution that won't deal
with storage level so it will resolve conflicts easily.
Personally I prefer rsync :)
How could dsync beat rsync?
With just one rsync command you can replicate the whole mail store (a
root folder)
Can you do the same with D
On 1/11/2010 9:34 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 11.1.2010, at 16.06, Alexander Chekalin wrote:
Doing this using imapsync won't work. It is slow (hours vs minutes with rsync)
so I can't run it every 5 minutes, and, moreover, it crashes on some messages,
so can not rely on it in production.
I'd love to use it (it's going to be magic solution for me).
But no I haven't looked at v2 yet. Is dsync is ready to use now or this
is just an alpha/beta concept code?
11.01.2010 16:34, Timo Sirainen пишет:
On 11.1.2010, at 16.06, Alexander Chekalin wrote:
Doing this using imapsync won't w
On 11.1.2010, at 16.41, Alexander Chekalin wrote:
> In fact I just try to understand if Dovecot's behaviour is right and my
> expectations are wrong, or vise versa. I mean when server see two identical
> messages (files) both in cur and in new dirs it can compare these files not
> only by name
In fact I just try to understand if Dovecot's behaviour is right and my
expectations are wrong, or vise versa. I mean when server see two
identical messages (files) both in cur and in new dirs it can compare
these files not only by name and rename if these names are the same, but
maybe check c
I see the only option I have is to use filesystem sync and not rsync.
Frankly I'd rather use rsync and not play with GEOM (I'm on FreeBSD) on
servers right now.
The problem as I've said is not sync itself but rather Dovecot's way of
treating files. You can test it yourself: go to your our cur/
On 11.1.2010, at 16.06, Alexander Chekalin wrote:
> Doing this using imapsync won't work. It is slow (hours vs minutes with
> rsync) so I can't run it every 5 minutes, and, moreover, it crashes on some
> messages, so can not rely on it in production.
With v2.0 dsync would be great for this..
Hi,
The idea was to have two identical (well, nearly identical) servers with
the same software and data on them, and while the first do its job as
SMTP and POP3/IMAP4 server, the second server just get copy of first's
current state (that is, copy user db and mail spool). In case of
something wro
Hi,
This is a general backup issue (files changing during backup run) and
nothing Dovecot specific. You should look into something that gives you
a consistent view of the data, f.i. LVM snapshots (when you're running
linux).
Regards,
Tom
Alexander Chekalin wrote:
> Yes, I'm trying to mak
Yes, I'm trying to make some backup solution.
The idea was to have two identical (well, nearly identical) servers with
the same software and data on them, and while the first do its job as
SMTP and POP3/IMAP4 server, the second server just get copy of first's
current state (that is, copy user
My apologies for posting this to the list; I meant to send it Timo only
Now that you're back in your native land. .
If and only if you're interested, I'D be interested in hearing what
you thought of America
--
Once upon a time, the Internet was a friendly,
neighbors-helping-neig
Now that you're back in your native land. .
If and only if you're interested, I'D be interested in hearing what you
thought of America: the things/customs that you thought were just plain
wrong or stupid, the things/customs you liked, things that made you
think, things that make you feel re
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 02:18:07PM +0200, Alexander Chekalin wrote:
> Oh, I finally find out the problem. If Dovecot see in the IMAP mailbox
> two message files named equally (say in cur/ and new/ dirs) it renames
> one of them into new name dispute this is the same message.
>
> I'm not sure if th
On 2010-01-11, Alexander Chekalin (acheka...@lazurit.com) wrote:
> I'm not sure if this is intended behaviour. It is quite easy to see
> such situation when doing periodical rsync (SMTP put message to new/
> dir, then rsync copy it to second server, then message on the first
> server move to cur/,
Oh, I finally find out the problem. If Dovecot see in the IMAP mailbox
two message files named equally (say in cur/ and new/ dirs) it renames
one of them into new name dispute this is the same message.
I'm not sure if this is intended behaviour. It is quite easy to see such
situation when doin
Hi,
finally i got shared namespace up and running.
But for example if user peter.griffin shares his inbox
to another user, the LIST "" "*" output on telnet
looks like:
a02 LIST "" "*"
* LIST (\HasNoChildren) "/" "Trash"
* LIST (\HasNoChildren) "/" "INBOX"
* LIST (\Noselect) "/" "shared/peter.gr
On Fri, 08 Jan 2010, Stephan Bosch wrote:
>> If I understand this right, sieve should do the RFC2047 encoding
>> only if the string is non-ASCII. But the RFC2047 encoded string is
>> already ASCII, so it should not be encoded a second time.
> Fixed:
>
> http://hg.rename-it.nl/dovecot-1.2-sieve/r
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 9 Jan 2010, Spyros Tsiolis wrote:
Jan 09 11:25:01 IMAP(postmas...@webmail.domain.gr): Error:
stat(/var/MailRoot/domains/webmail.domain.gr/postmaster/Maildir/tmp)
failed: Permission denied (euid=501(vmail) egid=502(vmail) missing +x
perm: /
Timo Sirainen wrote, on 28/07/09 19:24:
On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 19:17 +0100, Stuart Rowan wrote:
dovecot: 2009-07-28 10:23:16 Error: IMAP(strr): Corrupted index cache file
/home/local/strr/Maildir/dovecot.index.cache: record continues outside its
allocated size
dovecot: 2009-07-28 10:23:56 Error
30 matches
Mail list logo
