On 20/01/11 08:50, Per Jessen wrote:
Per Jessen wrote:
Pascal Volk wrote:
Hi Per,
now the +ext is included in the Delivered-To header again:
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.0/rev/a3a7cc0172fd
Thanks Pascal, that was fast!
Last night, I reverse applied the patch you mentioned earlier
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 05:27:52PM -0500, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2011-01-19 5:04 PM, pch0317 wrote:
I have dovecot 2.0.beta6 and I'm newbie with dovecot.
First assignment: upgrade to 2.0.9... why waste time fighting with bugs
that are already long fixed?
RHEL6 ships dovecot 2.0-beta6
Tom Hendrikx wrote:
On 20/01/11 08:50, Per Jessen wrote:
Per Jessen wrote:
Pascal Volk wrote:
Hi Per,
now the +ext is included in the Delivered-To header again:
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.0/rev/a3a7cc0172fd
Thanks Pascal, that was fast!
Last night, I reverse applied the patch
Am 20.01.2011 09:41, schrieb Per Jessen:
Tom Hendrikx wrote:
On 20/01/11 08:50, Per Jessen wrote:
Per Jessen wrote:
Pascal Volk wrote:
Hi Per,
now the +ext is included in the Delivered-To header again:
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.0/rev/a3a7cc0172fd
Thanks Pascal, that was fast!
Hi there,
We're running dovecot 2.06, with mdbox.
Following message was in our syslog:
Jan 20 09:26:48 servername dovecot: [ID 583609 mail.crit] imap(user): Panic: file istream-limit.c:
line 79: assertion failed: (v_offset = lstream-v_size)
The problem could be solved on client side, by just
Robert Schetterer wrote:
Am 20.01.2011 09:41, schrieb Per Jessen:
Tom Hendrikx wrote:
On 20/01/11 08:50, Per Jessen wrote:
Per Jessen wrote:
Pascal Volk wrote:
Hi Per,
now the +ext is included in the Delivered-To header again:
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.0/rev/a3a7cc0172fd
Am 20.01.2011 10:06, schrieb Per Jessen:
Robert Schetterer wrote:
Am 20.01.2011 09:41, schrieb Per Jessen:
Tom Hendrikx wrote:
On 20/01/11 08:50, Per Jessen wrote:
Per Jessen wrote:
Pascal Volk wrote:
Hi Per,
now the +ext is included in the Delivered-To header again:
Hello, Dovecot.
I'm using postfix + dovecot with pure virtual users. postfix uses
standard virtual transport, and dovecot fetches such fields from
userdb:
chroot: /usr/home/hosted/v-mail/%d/%n
home: /
mail: maildir:.
Everything works Ok -- dovecot founds users' mail.
Now, after upgrade
On 20/01/2011 06:06, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
If you think the above is hostile you have lived a privileged and sheltered
life, and I envy you. :) That isn't hostile but a combination of losing
patience and being blunt. Hostile is f--k you!. Obviously I wasn't being
hostile.
I'm living in the
On 2011-01-20 4:06 AM, Per Jessen wrote:
I've been reading
a bit, and I think the issue is that postfix adds X-Original-To when
delivering to a mailbox - which delivery via smtp/lmtp isn't.
I'm not sure if postfix should be adding it - postfix applies
virtual_aliases_maps, then delivers to
On 2011-01-20 3:31 AM, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 05:27:52PM -0500, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2011-01-19 5:04 PM, pch0317 wrote:
I have dovecot 2.0.beta6 and I'm newbie with dovecot.
First assignment: upgrade to 2.0.9... why waste time fighting with bugs
that are
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 7:32 AM, Jan-Frode Myklebust janfr...@tanso.net wrote:
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 05:16:50PM -0800, Brad Davidson wrote:
Don't give up on the simplest solution too easily - lots of us run NFS
with quite large installs. As a matter of fact, I think all of the large
As of late our four node dovecot 1.2.13 cluster has been experiencing a
massive number of these dotlock errors:
Created dotlock file's timestamp is different than current time
(1295480202 vs 1295479784): /mail/user/Maildir/dovecot-uidlist
These dotlock errors correspond with very high load
I inherited a server from a previous employee. The server crashed so it was
time to move everything over to another server. We have a web mail site and
I installed everything running dovecot, postfix and roundcube. After I
installed it, everything worked great when I created a new user. The
Basically after thinking about it I added another SQL user/password DB
lookup that has a default domain name on the sql query.
passdb {
args = /usr/local/etc/dovecot/sql.conf.ext
driver = sql
}
passdb {
args = /usr/local/etc/dovecot/sql.conf2.ext
driver = sql
}
passdb {
driver =
Lev Serebryakov wrote:
Hello, Dovecot.
I'm using postfix + dovecot with pure virtual users. postfix uses
standard virtual transport, and dovecot fetches such fields from
userdb:
chroot: /usr/home/hosted/v-mail/%d/%n
home: /
mail: maildir:.
Everything works Ok -- dovecot founds
I was looking at my dovecot.deliver log and it's showing that it's
delivering it to the Inbox:
deliver(samantha.fre...@mybridemail.com): 01/20/2011 10:44:27 Info: auth
input: home=/home/vmail/mybridemail.com/samantha.freeze
deliver(samantha.fre...@mybridemail.com): 01/20/2011 10:44:27 Info:
[]'sf.rique
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 12:10 PM, alex handle alex.han...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 7:32 AM, Jan-Frode Myklebust janfr...@tanso.net
wrote:
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 05:16:50PM -0800, Brad Davidson wrote:
Don't give up on the simplest solution too easily - lots
This morning I have a Outlook 2007 user who getting the error and I am
unsure how to fix it.
Cannot open this item. The server responded: Error in IMAP command UID
FETCH: Invalid uidset'
DoveCot v 1.2.9
# 1.2.9: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
# OS: Linux 2.6.32-27-generic-pae i686 Ubuntu 10.04.1
Ed W put forth on 1/20/2011 6:54 AM:
Oh well, pleading over. Good luck and genuinely thanks to Stan for spending
his
valuable time here. Here's hoping you will continue to do so, but also being
nice to the dummies?
Dummies isn't what this was about. Again, I misread the intent of your
l...@airstreamcomm.net put forth on 1/20/2011 8:32 AM:
Secondly we thought the issues were due to NTP as the time stamps vary so
widely, so we rebuilt our NTP servers and found closer stratum 1 source
clocks to synchronize to hoping it would alleviate the problem but the
dotlock errors
Henrique Fernandes put forth on 1/20/2011 10:20 AM:
I have about 1TB used and it takes 22 hrs to backup maildirs!
To tape library or D2D? Are you doing differential backup or full backup each
time?
4/8Gb fiber channel or 1 GbE iSCSI based SAN array?
--
Stan
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 5:20 PM, Henrique Fernandes sf.ri...@gmail.com wrote:
Not all, if this counts as large:
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/gpfsmail 9.9T 8.7T 1.2T 88% /maildirs
Filesystem Inodes IUsed IFree
Hello, Per.
You wrote 20 января 2011 г., 18:30:44:
chroot: /usr/home/hosted/v-mail/%d/%n
home: /
mail: maildir:.
For starters, I think you need to return a field mail containing
perhaps:
maildir:/usr/home/hosted/v-mail/domain/user
Then IMAP4/POP3 processes will do chroot to
--- On Thu, 20/1/11, Henrique Fernandes sf.ri...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Henrique Fernandes sf.ri...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [Dovecot] Best Cluster Storage
To: alex handle alex.han...@gmail.com
Cc: dovecot@dovecot.org
Date: Thursday, 20 January, 2011, 18:20
[]'sf.rique
On Thu, Jan 20,
Stan!
Sorry i did not explained well!
FULL
Spool to disk: ~24h TransferRate: 6MB/s
Despool to tape: ~7h TransferRate: 16MB/s
INCREMENTAL
Spool to disk: ~11hTransferRate: 300KB/s
Despool to tape: ~12m TransferRate: 16MB/s
When doind a backup, we turn on another machine in the
Lev Serebryakov wrote:
Hello, Per.
You wrote 20 января 2011 г., 18:30:44:
chroot: /usr/home/hosted/v-mail/%d/%n
home: /
mail: maildir:.
For starters, I think you need to return a field mail containing
perhaps:
maildir:/usr/home/hosted/v-mail/domain/user
Then IMAP4/POP3 processes
Hello, Per.
You wrote 20 января 2011 г., 21:28:11:
chroot: /usr/home/hosted/v-mail/%d/%n
home: /
mail: maildir:.
Then IMAP4/POP3 processes will do chroot to
/usr/home/hosted/v-mail/domain/user and will try to find
maildir:/usr/home/hosted/v-mail/domain/user RELATIVE to chroot. Mail
will be
Lev Serebryakov wrote:
Hello, Per.
You wrote 20 января 2011 г., 21:28:11:
chroot: /usr/home/hosted/v-mail/%d/%n
home: /
mail: maildir:.
Then IMAP4/POP3 processes will do chroot to
/usr/home/hosted/v-mail/domain/user and will try to find
maildir:/usr/home/hosted/v-mail/domain/user
On 20/01/11 13:31, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2011-01-20 3:31 AM, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 05:27:52PM -0500, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2011-01-19 5:04 PM, pch0317 wrote:
I have dovecot 2.0.beta6 and I'm newbie with dovecot.
First
On 1/20/11 12:06 AM -0600 Stan Hoeppner wrote:
This is amusing considering XFS is hands down
the best filesystem available on any platform, including ZFS. Others are
simply ignorant and repeat what they've heard without looking for current
information.
Not to be overly brusque, but that's a
On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 15:21 +0300, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
Jan 20 12:19:25 lmtp(38939, l...@domain.com): Error: mkdir(./cur) in
directory /var/run/dovecot failed: Permission denied (euid=3(v-mail)
egid=3(v-mail) missing +w perm: ., euid is not dir owner)
Fixed:
On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 08:32 -0600, l...@airstreamcomm.net wrote:
Created dotlock file's timestamp is different than current time
(1295480202 vs 1295479784): /mail/user/Maildir/dovecot-uidlist
Hmm. This may be a bug that happens when dotlocking has to wait for a
long time for dotlock. See if
On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 11:02 -0500, Aaron Pettitt wrote:
It's really strange why dovecot can deliver the mail to the inbox but cannot
see the inbox when trying to retrieve the mail
Set mail_debug=yes. See what it logs when logging in as the user. It
should log where it's looking for the
On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 11:22 -0500, Jason Liedtke wrote:
This morning I have a Outlook 2007 user who getting the error and I am
unsure how to fix it.
Cannot open this item. The server responded: Error in IMAP command UID
FETCH: Invalid uidset'
Looks like Outlook is sending some garbage to
On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 19:36 -0600, Matt Rude wrote:
On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 17:02:48 -0500, Mauricio Tavares wrote:
Who
populates/creates the initial files and folders in the user
mailbox?
Dovecot
No, IMAP clients do that typically.
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Plugins/Autocreate [1] will
Stan,
Thanks for the reply. In our case we have actually already done most of
the work you suggested to no avail. We had rebuilt two new ntp servers
that sync against two stratum 1 sources, and all our nfs clients,
regardless of using dovecot, sync to those two machines. You bring up the
On 2011-01-20 8:57 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
l...@airstreamcomm.net put forth on 1/20/2011 8:32 AM:
Secondly we thought the issues were due to NTP as the time stamps vary so
widely, so we rebuilt our NTP servers and found closer stratum 1 source
clocks to synchronize to hoping it would
Thanks for the reply Timo. Here are parts of the debug log and it looks
just like a user that works.
dovecot: 01/20/2011 10:27:25 Info: imap-login: Login:
user=samantha.fre...@mybridemail.com, method=PLAIN, rip=127.0.0.1,
lip=127.0.0.1, secured
dovecot: 01/20/2011 10:27:25 Info:
On 20.1.2011, at 23.37, Aaron Pettitt wrote:
Note the difference of upper/lowercasing:
dovecot: 01/20/2011 10:27:25 Info: IMAP(samantha.fre...@mybridemail.com):
maildir++: root=/home/vmail/mybridemail.com/Samantha.Freeze, index=,
control=, inbox=/home/vmail/mybridemail.com/Samantha.Freeze
That did it Timo. Thank you so much I guess coming from the windows
world, some habits are still hard to break... Again, I can't thank you
enough!
-Original Message-
From: Timo Sirainen [mailto:t...@iki.fi]
Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 4:49 PM
To: Aaron Pettitt
Cc:
We have both dovecot and a webmail application that are both modifying
our users maildirs, so dovecot indexes can be out of sync when the
webmail has been messing with the maildirs. We also have a webservice
that report how many unread messages a user has in his inbox, which is
simply counting
On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 23:50 +0100, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
But this woun´t work if the maildir has been modified outside of
dovecot (i.e. webmail usage). Are there any simple interface I can use
in this short snippet for noticing that the index is out of sync, and
update it ?
With v2.0
I'd like to allow a user to move messages between his folders on Dovecot
IMAP account, but prevent move/copy from different accounts (Exchange in
particular).
Outlook uses xx UID COPY 1 folder and then xx UID STORE 1 +FLAGS
(\Deleted \Seen) for internal moves and xx APPEND folder for external
On 21.1.2011, at 1.51, Alex Cherniak wrote:
I'd like to allow a user to move messages between his folders on Dovecot
IMAP account, but prevent move/copy from different accounts (Exchange in
particular).
Outlook uses xx UID COPY 1 folder and then xx UID STORE 1 +FLAGS
(\Deleted \Seen) for
l...@airstreamcomm.net put forth on 1/20/2011 11:09 AM:
Stan,
Thanks for the reply. In our case we have actually already done most of
the work you suggested to no avail. We had rebuilt two new ntp servers
that sync against two stratum 1 sources, and all our nfs clients,
regardless of
Henrique Fernandes put forth on 1/20/2011 11:55 AM:
Even the storage system is not SUN those ocfs2 servers are connect via iSCSI
from the storage with ocfs2 in virtual machine
Please provide a web link to the iSCSI storage array product you are using, and
tell us how many 1GbE ports you are
Stan,
On 1/20/11 7:45 PM, Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com wrote:
What you're supposed to do, and what VMWare recommends, is to run ntpd _only
in
the ESX host_ and _not_ in each guest. According to:
http://kb.vmware.com/selfservice/microsites/search.do?language=en_UScmd=displ
Frank Cusack put forth on 1/20/2011 2:30 PM:
On 1/20/11 12:06 AM -0600 Stan Hoeppner wrote:
This is amusing considering XFS is hands down
the best filesystem available on any platform, including ZFS. Others are
simply ignorant and repeat what they've heard without looking for current
Gregory Finch put forth on 1/20/2011 3:27 PM:
You're much better off running one ntp server than two. With just two
servers providing time, if they drift from one another, for whatever
reason, there is no way to tell which one has the correct time. If you
need to ensure the time is correct,
Brandon Davidson put forth on 1/20/2011 11:22 PM:
Stan,
On 1/20/11 7:45 PM, Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com wrote:
What you're supposed to do, and what VMWare recommends, is to run ntpd _only
in
the ESX host_ and _not_ in each guest. According to:
[]'sf.rique
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 2:14 AM, Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.comwrote:
Henrique Fernandes put forth on 1/20/2011 11:55 AM:
Even the storage system is not SUN those ocfs2 servers are connect via
iSCSI
from the storage with ocfs2 in virtual machine
Storage are an EMC CX4
52 matches
Mail list logo
