Hi,
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 3:40 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 4.7.2011, at 13.07, Wolfgang Rosenauer wrote:
>
>> Two telnet imap connections open and both idling on the inbox and only
>> one of them gets the "1 recent" notification.
>
> This is how it's supposed to work according to IMAP RFC. Onl
Timo,
I started dovecot on both servers in debug mode. I'm attaching the output.
The mail unfortunately is still stuck, sigh!
Regards,
CINZIA INNOCENZI
Technical Consulting
HP Enterprise Services
Telephone +39 06.6542.5758
Email cinzia.innoce...@hp.com
Via Achille Campanile, 85 / Rome, Italy
Hello Timo,
I'm sorry I haven't replied before, but I've been investigating as much as
possible on this problem, and, for a moment, I thought I came up with
something...
Thanks to Simone Caruso's hint, I've been doing some checks on LMTP-LDAP
connections, since I would always get an LDAP error
On Mon, 4 Jul 2011 12:38:01 +0200, Andraž 'ruskie' Levstik wrote:
:2011-06-28T21:38:Sergey Urushkin:
Hi. I had working Exim 4.71 and Dovecot 1.2.9 SASL configuration on
Ubuntu
Lucid, but needed some features from dovecot2, so I installed 2.0.13
from
https://launchpad.net/~carsten-uppenbrink-ne
Hi,
I'm having a problem I can't get my head around. I'm trying to setup a
public mailbox that is hidden from all users unless granted access through
an ACL.
My folder structure is (migrated from a Courier IMAP/Qmail server):
/var/spool/maildir - main public folder (contains a few .qmail files t
On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 09:02:59AM -0500, I wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 02:58:34PM +0300, Amira Othman wrote:
> > Iam using dovecot-1.0.7-7.el5 and postfix-2.3.3-2.3.el5_6 on
> > centos 5.6 I want to configure mail server without system account
> > .I can send using the virtual account but c
On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 02:58:34PM +0300, Amira Othman wrote:
> Iam using dovecot-1.0.7-7.el5 and postfix-2.3.3-2.3.el5_6 on centos
> 5.6 I want to configure mail server without system account .I can
> send using the virtual account but can't receive and I have this in
> log file
>
> relay=loca
On 2011-07-04 7:58 AM, Amira Othman wrote:
> Iam using dovecot-1.0.7-7.el5 and postfix-2.3.3-2.3.el5_6
Need I say it?
Upgrade. Both are now unsupported/EOL for a long time now...
--
Best regards,
Charles
On 4.7.2011, at 13.07, Wolfgang Rosenauer wrote:
> Two telnet imap connections open and both idling on the inbox and only
> one of them gets the "1 recent" notification.
This is how it's supposed to work according to IMAP RFC. Only one session ever
sees a message as \Recent. Both of them gets an
Op 4-7-2011 14:19, m...@smtp.fakessh.eu schreef:
Le lundi 4 juillet 2011 00:40, m...@smtp.fakessh.eu a écrit :
> I just change my sieve script by removing the implicit discard a
> fileinto :create "Junk.spam.spam"
[...]
it just happened a mail that was issued in INBOX.spam.spam supposedly
a
Hello All;
Iam using dovecot-1.0.7-7.el5 and postfix-2.3.3-2.3.el5_6 on centos 5.6 I
want to configure mail server without system account .I can send using the
virtual account but can't receive and I have this in log file
relay=local, delay=0.02, delays=0.02/0/0/0, dsn=5.1.1, status=bounced
(unkn
> Mon, 04 Jul 2011 10:46:31 Ed W
> On 03/07/2011 07:20, Peter Dolding wrote:
> > Now what I need to be able to deal with the problem.
>
> Have you considered a new Dovecot storage backend? I have plotted some
> designs on a napkin a few times.. Consider some kind of storage server
> with "eventual
Le lundi 4 juillet 2011 00:40, m...@smtp.fakessh.eu a écrit :
> Le dimanche 3 juillet 2011 23:57, Stephan Bosch a écrit :
> > On 07/03/2011 10:22 PM, m...@smtp.fakessh.eu wrote:
> > > I met a few times the problem or an email that passes through a sieve
> > > script is silently discard
> > > after
:2011-06-28T21:38:Sergey Urushkin:
> Hi. I had working Exim 4.71 and Dovecot 1.2.9 SASL configuration on Ubuntu
> Lucid, but needed some features from dovecot2, so I installed 2.0.13 from
> https://launchpad.net/~carsten-uppenbrink-net/+archive/dovecot2 . Now I get
> Subj error while trying to aut
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 11:25 AM, Ed W wrote:
> On 04/07/2011 09:04, Wolfgang Rosenauer wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> in my testing dovecot (1.2 in that case) seems to not notify all
>> idling clients about new "recent" mails but only one of them. The
>> others get usually a message about the new number
On 03/07/2011 07:20, Peter Dolding wrote:
> Now what I need to be able to deal with the problem.
Have you considered a new Dovecot storage backend? I have plotted some
designs on a napkin a few times.. Consider some kind of storage server
with "eventually consistent" replication capabilities. Th
On 04/07/2011 09:04, Wolfgang Rosenauer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> in my testing dovecot (1.2 in that case) seems to not notify all
> idling clients about new "recent" mails but only one of them. The
> others get usually a message about the new number of mails after some
> time but never recent ones.
> Only
Hi,
in my testing dovecot (1.2 in that case) seems to not notify all
idling clients about new "recent" mails but only one of them. The
others get usually a message about the new number of mails after some
time but never recent ones.
Only one client gets notified about a new mail. Is that a known i
18 matches
Mail list logo
