On 11.07.2011, at 17:03, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> The R410 is a two socket Xeon box with max 2 x 6 core CPUs. The 24 CPUs
> you see is the result of HyperThreading being enabled. I'd disable HT
> if I were you, or those boxen mine.
Why?
Rainer
On Tue, 2011-07-12 at 00:21 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Are these virtual machines? You didn't state so previously. Running
> 2.6.18 as a VM guest on these machines may also be part of the incorrect
> load reporting problem. If so, run the data collector daemon inside the
> hypervisor itself s
On 7/11/2011 2:57 PM, Matthew Macdonald-Wallace wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-07-11 at 13:47 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>> On 7/11/2011 11:22 AM, li...@truthisfreedom.org.uk wrote:
>>
>>> They're showing as between 20 and 24 for the POP3 servers and 1.4 for
>>> the IMAP servers.
>>
>> FULL STOP. Oh my lo
On Mon, 11 Jul 2011 20:57:36 +0100, Matthew Macdonald-Wallace wrote:
LOL. I'm not a fan of Centos but it's what we've got to play with
here -
We'll be running Debian (or possibly even Gentoo if I have my way...)
on
the next load of servers and custom kernels aren't an issue.
/me misses stage
On 07/11/11 15:57, Matthew Macdonald-Wallace wrote:
>
> LOL. I'm not a fan of Centos but it's what we've got to play with here -
> We'll be running Debian (or possibly even Gentoo if I have my way...) on
> the next load of servers and custom kernels aren't an issue.
Just don't tell anyone:
htt
On Mon, 2011-07-11 at 13:47 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> On 7/11/2011 11:22 AM, li...@truthisfreedom.org.uk wrote:
>
> > They're showing as between 20 and 24 for the POP3 servers and 1.4 for
> > the IMAP servers.
>
> FULL STOP. Oh my lordy. Something is ridiculously wrong here. You
> have 12
On 7/11/2011 11:22 AM, li...@truthisfreedom.org.uk wrote:
> They're showing as between 20 and 24 for the POP3 servers and 1.4 for
> the IMAP servers.
FULL STOP. Oh my lordy. Something is ridiculously wrong here. You
have 12 physical cores with only ~600 simultaneous pop connections.
That's onl
No one has any idea of what happens ?
I forgot to say that mailboxes are MailDir format.
Le 05/07/2011 17:46, Florent Bautista a écrit :
Hi all,
I just joigned this list, so I'm sorry if this problem has already
been reported.
I'm running Dovecot 2.0.13 on many servers, one for POP/IMAP acc
* All the servers are made by the same manufacturer (Dell)
* They are all the same model (R410)
* The have the same engine (24 cores, 24G RAM, SAS Drives)
The R410 is a two socket Xeon box with max 2 x 6 core CPUs. The 24 CPUs
you see is the result of HyperThreading being enabled. I'd disable
Look at mbox_read_locks and mbox_write_locks parameters.
From http://wiki2.dovecot.org/MailboxFormat/mbox:
There are at least four different ways to lock a mbox:
• dotlock: mailboxname.lock file created by almost all software when writing t
On 7/11/2011 8:20 AM, li...@truthisfreedom.org.uk wrote:
> Hi Stan,
>
> Quoting Stan Hoeppner :
>
>> On 7/11/2011 4:28 AM, li...@truthisfreedom.org.uk wrote:
>>> Quoting Stan Hoeppner :
>> This still doesn't provide us with the necessary information to give you
>> an intelligent answer to your qu
Anyone ?
> From: satish...@hotmail.com
> To: dovecot@dovecot.org
> Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2011 17:08:40 +
> Subject: [Dovecot] Dovecot NFS locking issue
>
>
> Hi All,
>
> We had 15 imap/pop UW-imap servers behind load balancer and mail storage was
> NFS for almost around ~30,000 users on it.
Hi Stan,
Quoting Stan Hoeppner :
On 7/11/2011 4:28 AM, li...@truthisfreedom.org.uk wrote:
Quoting Stan Hoeppner :
This still doesn't provide us with the necessary information to give you
an intelligent answer to your question.
Sorry, I thought I'd given quite a large amount of detail so far
On 08/07/2011 11:35, Mike Prispan wrote:
could someone answer my following questions about dovecot indexes?
- If I delete dovecot indexes, it recreates them without any problem,
right?
AFAIK,
for mbox and Maildir: True,
for sdbox and mdbox: False.
- If dovecot recreates indexes, it does no
I found a strange behaviour in dovecot compressed folder, maybe a bug.
It happens only if you have one (and just one!) email in a gz compressed folder.
I'm talking about a mbox server.
Step to reproduce:
- create a new folder, using any client (I think this step is not important, it
happens also
On 7/11/2011 4:28 AM, li...@truthisfreedom.org.uk wrote:
> Quoting Stan Hoeppner :
>
>> On 7/11/2011 1:24 AM, Matthew Macdonald-Wallace wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 10:48 +0100, li...@truthisfreedom.org.uk wrote:
We have noticed that the IMAP servers appear to be under much less
load
Hi, I'm trying to get the drac plugin working (again) but I'm stuck with the
following message:
Restarting IMAP/POP3 mail server: dovecotEDRAC: net_ip2addr() failed: Operation
not permitted
This is on a Debian Squeeze box, dovecot version 1.2.15-7, drac version 1.12
Looking at the source it sh
El 08/07/11 14:04, Angel L. Mateo escribió:
El 08/07/11 12:18, Angel L. Mateo escribió:
Hello,
I have configured two dovecot servers with director acting as
lmtp/imap/pop proxy server with 8 dovecot backend servers.
In our test environment we had no problem, but when we migrated to
production
Quoting Stan Hoeppner :
On 7/11/2011 1:24 AM, Matthew Macdonald-Wallace wrote:
On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 10:48 +0100, li...@truthisfreedom.org.uk wrote:
We have noticed that the IMAP servers appear to be under much less
load and utilising drastically less RAM than the POP3 servers and I'm
wonderin
Am 10.07.2011 18:36, schrieb Christian Roessner:
> Hi,
>
>> http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Clients#Thunderbird
>>
>> protocol imap {
>> imap_client_workarounds = tb-extra-mailbox-sep
>> }
>>
>> That should also solve your second problem.
>
> thank you VERY much :-) This really solved my problems
>
>
Am 10.07.2011 18:00, schrieb Christian Roessner:
> Hi,
>
> I use Dovecot-2.0.13 with mdbox and Thunderbird (IMAP). I have dozens of
> imap folders and sometimes I wish to delete several folders:
>
> First Problem:
>
> If I remove a folder under TB, it get moved to my Trash folder. After
> that I
On 7/11/2011 1:24 AM, Matthew Macdonald-Wallace wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 10:48 +0100, li...@truthisfreedom.org.uk wrote:
>> We have noticed that the IMAP servers appear to be under much less
>> load and utilising drastically less RAM than the POP3 servers and I'm
>> wondering if there is
I'm trying to migrate my old dovecot server (mbox based) to a new one (maildir
based), both are version 2.0.13.
I'm using dsync:
oldserver# dsync -u username backup ssh root@newserver dsync -u username
Everything is working like a charm but when it tries to convert compressed
folder I got an e
On 07/08/2011 04:35 AM, Mike Prispan wrote:
Hi,
could someone answer my following questions about dovecot indexes?
- If I delete dovecot indexes, it recreates them without any problem, right?
I believe this depends. Maildir and mbox I don't think care. However,
dbox and mdbox do and you'll l
24 matches
Mail list logo
