Hello Stephan,
Am 02.09.2011 um 19:25 schrieb Stephan Bosch:
> Are you perhaps using the automated Debian packages?
I´m also upgraded to latest Debian version and I´ve got the following errors:
Preparing to replace dovecot-managesieved 2:2.0.13-0~auto+71 (using
.../dovecot-managesieved_2%3a2.0
On 3.9.2011, at 6.06, Kui Zhang wrote:
> We are getting following errors when moving mail from inbox to any folder.
>
> "Message has been copied too many times (32767+1)"
mdbox? Is it actually copied that many times?
Am 02.09.2011 um 23:15 schrieb Stephan Bosch:
> D'oh, builder did not update from patch repositories. Starting build now...
>
> Regards,
>
> Stephan.
Working now :) Minor glitch I noticed for the build: Appears 'libpq5' is
required by 'dovecot-common' even if no SQL package is installed… Wonde
Hello
We are getting following errors when moving mail from inbox to any folder.
"Message has been copied too many times (32767+1)"
lazy_expunge is enabled.
Error messages seems to be from libdovecot-storage.
Any one can confirm the bug? or knows of a work around?
Thanks
K.Z
Sorry,
I cleaned out all of my Maildirs and public folders
and started over. Also changed ACL to lrs, and so
far, everything is working as expected.
Kris
On 9/2/11 4:46 PM, Kristen J. Webb wrote:
Hi All,
I have public mailboxes working with ACL's now, and I'm testing the ACL
behavior. I've add
Hi All,
I have public mailboxes working with ACL's now, and I'm testing the ACL
behavior. I've added lrws to two users so they can check off the messages
they have read. I'm using CONTROL and INDEX in the location parameter for
the namespace. It appears that if one user marks a message as read
On 9/2/2011 8:38 PM, Thomas Leuxner wrote:
Am 02.09.2011 um 20:35 schrieb Stephan Bosch:
Then, it actually is my fault. The v2.1 packages also involve a login patch of
mine, which apparently broke STARTTLS. I've fixed it and a new set of packages
is available within the hour.
Regards,
Stepha
Am 02.09.2011 um 20:35 schrieb Stephan Bosch:
>
> Then, it actually is my fault. The v2.1 packages also involve a login patch
> of mine, which apparently broke STARTTLS. I've fixed it and a new set of
> packages is available within the hour.
>
> Regards,
>
> Stephan.
I shall then rebuild as s
On 9/2/2011 7:48 PM, Thomas Leuxner wrote:
Am 02.09.2011 um 19:25 schrieb Stephan Bosch:
Are you perhaps using the automated Debian packages?
Regards,
Stephan.
Indeed I am. Guilty...
Then, it actually is my fault. The v2.1 packages also involve a login
patch of mine, which apparently brok
On 9/1/2011 10:34 PM, Dong Ding wrote:
I used postfix always_bcc to backup mail. And up to now the backup account
has half million mails in cur/, when I first time tried to receive the mail
by outlook, it failed , no responds.
Does any one has some good idea to deal with this problem?
If it
Am 02.09.2011 um 19:25 schrieb Stephan Bosch:
> Are you perhaps using the automated Debian packages?
>
> Regards,
>
> Stephan.
Indeed I am. Guilty...
On 9/2/2011 12:21 PM, Thomas Leuxner wrote:
Hi,
any idea why STARTTLS would not work after replacing 2.0.14 with the
alpha? When STARTTLS is not requested by the client it can connect. Config
is unaltered working 2.0.14 one.
Are you perhaps using the automated Debian packages?
Regards,
Steph
Depending on Outlook pst format, I know the old (outlook 2000) format
can't have more than 16383 or 32767 (can't remember which) messages in a
single folder. Ran into this problem at our office once. Best solution
was to use sieve to split the mail archive into folders by year and by
month. This ma
> Thanks for sharing solved problem.
Thanks for participation too.
> But I think this question better to forward to Kerberos mailing list.
Unfortunately, I have difficulties with making a competent wording of my
question. Source codes of KRB5 libs explode my brain. I cant understand
them deeply
On Fri, 2 Sep 2011 10:34:29 +0800
Dong Ding articulated:
> Hi,
>
> I used postfix always_bcc to backup mail. And up to now the backup
> account has half million mails in cur/, when I first time tried to
> receive the mail by outlook, it failed , no responds.
>
> Does any one has some good idea
Hi,
any idea why STARTTLS would not work after replacing 2.0.14 with the
alpha? When STARTTLS is not requested by the client it can connect. Config
is unaltered working 2.0.14 one.
Regards
Thomas
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Timo Sirainen said the following on 01/09/11 16:53:
Oh.. What OS is this? See what it logs with
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.1/rev/1c2d8da38a06
Between a lot of ucpu events logged there are some like:
Sep 2 11:41:52 mail dovecot: stats: Error: Mail server input error:
UPDATE-SESSION: st
Timo Sirainen said the following on 01/09/11 16:53:
Sep 1 16:39:43 mail dovecot: stats: Error: Mail server input error:
UPDATE-SESSION: stats shrank
Oh.. What OS is this? See what it logs with
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.1/rev/1c2d8da38a06
Sorry for the delay...
Sep 2 11:03:11 mail do
On 8/31/11, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
> I'm seeing some warnings & errors in my logs & dmesg - and Google tells
> me this can the result of several factors, including the hard drives. I
> haven't seen any SMART warnings as yet - but I am getting a little
> nervous and thinking about upgrading the s
Hi,
At least, rather than Seagate AS series or some "green" series try
using Seagate ST.SV series SATA HDDs, the 10$ difference is woth it.
They are certified for 7/24 operation and will not fail on you as
quickly. And they perform a little bit faster.
Regards,
Kerem
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 8:5
Am 01.09.2011 21:22, schrieb Kristen J. Webb:
> Hi All,
>
> Thanks for all the responses! While I like the idea
> of moving to dovecot 2.x for new features, it is
> not part of the ubuntu packages,
search list archive, there are ubuntu packs dove 2.x out there
in some repositories
i i.e recompi
21 matches
Mail list logo
