Re: [Dovecot] Please advise on very fast search

On 11/15/2011 1:02 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote: On Tue, 2011-11-15 at 12:26 -0600, Stan Hoeppner wrote: This is why I recommended mbox in the first place. If your only writes to these mailbox files are appends of new messages, mbox is the best format by far. It's faster at appending than any

Re: [Dovecot] Port variable in LMTP userdb lookups?

Thanks so much for that have tested in 2.0.16 release now and is working fine. Mark From: Timo Sirainen [t...@iki.fi] Sent: 16 November 2011 18:25 To: Mark Zealey Cc: Dovecot Mailing List Subject: Re: [Dovecot] Port variable in LMTP userdb lookups? On

Re: [Dovecot] Mail lost - maybe a bug???

Hello Timo, and thanks for your reply I waited to reply until got it another time as I already said, it does not happen very often, for example it happened on 12 november - the log is at the end of this mail Enable mail_log plugin to make sure of this.

Re: [Dovecot] Mail lost - maybe a bug???

Hi, On 17.11.2011 17:47, Marco Carcano wrote: Hello Timo, and thanks for your reply I waited to reply until got it another time as I already said, it does not happen very often, for example it happened on 12 november - the log is at the end of this mail Enable mail_log plugin to make

Re: [Dovecot] Mail lost - maybe a bug???

On 17.11.2011, at 18.47, Marco Carcano wrote: Oct 27 11:20:34 srv001 dovecot: lda(user3): msgid=e9447410-51fe-45ff-b624-197840b9a...@usstlz-pinfez02.emrsn.org : saved mail to INBOX If Dovecot logs this, then the message definitely was saved to INBOX. it is exactly what I told to my

Re: [Dovecot] Performance-Tuning

[]'sf.rique How many servers have access to your maildir on ext4 so that you could switch from ocfs2 to ext4? I use ocfs2 in my test environment for four servers (2 MX and 2 IMAP) I used have 3 serves one mailman and 2 imaps.I experence that if take my loadbalancer and takes it all to

Re: [Dovecot] 2.1: virtual plugin and lsub

On 16.11.2011 19:02, wroteTimo Sirainen: On Wed, 2011-11-09 at 20:08 +0100, e-frog wrote: On 06.11.2011 17:03, wrote e-frog: 1 lsub virtual/* * LSUB () / virtual * LSUB () / virtual/Lists * LSUB () / virtual/unread 1 OK Lsub completed. Just tested this again with 2.1beta1 with the same

Re: [Dovecot] Mail lost - maybe a bug???

Hello Timo and Urban, and thank you for the very quick reply I have already thought about these things: I have already disabled mailbox deletion from POP3 clients, that actually just leave the messages on the server however, this time noone of the 4 recipients got the email - so it is

[Dovecot] Dovecot performance issues with many writes

We are currently experiencing performance issue with our Dovecot system which we believe is caused by excessive writes to the dovecot files. The confusing thing is that we are seeing more writes than reads on our Dovecot volume when you would assume that most of the IO should be reads from

Re: [Dovecot] dsync problems

On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 22:43:24 +0200, Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote: On Tue, 2011-11-15 at 14:24 -0500, Micah Anderson wrote: When a user renames their username, I am using dsync to copy their mail over to the new username's mail location[0]. Some of the dsyncs are failing with errors

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot performance issues with many writes

On 17.11.2011, at 23.30, Andy Robbins wrote: We can't figure out why we would be seeing twice as many writes as we are reads. Could this have something to do with the index files? dovecot -n output would be helpful.

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot performance issues with many writes

# dovecot -n # 1.2.9: //etc/dovecot.conf # OS: Linux 2.6.18-164.9.1.el5 x86_64 CentOS release 5.4 (Final) base_dir: /var/run/dovecot/ log_path: /var/log/dovecot.log protocols: imap pop3 ssl_cert_file: /etc/postfix/ssl/smtp1.domain.com.cert ssl_key_file: /etc/postfix/ssl/smtp1.domain.com.key

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot performance issues with many writes

On 18.11.2011, at 0.20, Andy Robbins wrote: # iostat -d 5 -x Device: rrqm/s wrqm/s r/s w/s rsec/s wsec/s avgrq-sz avgqu-sz await svctm %util dm-4 0.00 0.00 485.80 865.80 3886.40 6926.40 8.0028.69 19.63 0.70 94.00 drbd0 0.00

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot performance issues with many writes

On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 03:30:07PM -0600, Andy Robbins wrote: We are currently experiencing performance issue with our Dovecot system which we believe is caused by excessive writes to the dovecot files. The confusing thing is that we are seeing more writes than reads on our Dovecot volume when

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot performance issues with many writes

Well, the iostat command was run from the NFS server and dovecot was run from the mail server where it is mounted, hence the discrepancy there. On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 4:34 PM, Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote: On 18.11.2011, at 0.20, Andy Robbins wrote: # iostat -d 5 -x Device:

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot performance issues with many writes

Do you have more than one Dovecot server? If only one, you can still disable the mail_nfs_* settings. Also it would be interesting to see nfsstat numbers from the Dovecot server, compared to those iostat numbers.. On 18.11.2011, at 0.38, Andy Robbins wrote: Well, the iostat command was run

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot performance issues with many writes

Am Donnerstag, 17. November 2011, 22:30:07 schrieb Andy Robbins: We are currently experiencing performance issue with our Dovecot system which we believe is caused by excessive writes to the dovecot files. The confusing thing is that we are seeing more writes than reads on our Dovecot volume

[Dovecot] Mail_quota plugin and LDAP on Dovecot 1.2

Hi, I'm new in this List, but I have 6 years using Dovecot on my debian from etch,lenny and now squeeze Package: dovecot-imapd Version: 1:1.2.15-4 Tags: squeeze -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0 APT prefers stable APT policy: (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: