We recently upgraded our cluster to 2.1.3, to enable director proxying.
Everything appears to be working fine for the most part; the only odd
thing is that I'm seeing a lot of entries in the logs like this:
Apr 7 02:18:05 mail-out06 dovecot: pop3-login: Fatal: master:
service(pop3-login):
On 4/5/2012 3:02 PM, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote:
Hi Emmanuel,
I'm trying to improve the setup of our Dovecot/Exim mail servers to
handle the increasingly huge accounts (everybody thinks it's like
infinitely growing storage like gmail and stores everything forever in
their email accounts) by
On 4/7/12, Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com wrote:
Firstly, thanks for the comprehensive reply. :)
I'll assume networked storage nodes means NFS, not FC/iSCSI SAN, in
which case you'd have said SAN.
I haven't decided on that but it would either be NFS or iSCSI over
Gigabit. I don't
On 4/6/2012 1:00 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2012-04-06 2:53 PM, Daniel L. Miller dmil...@amfes.com wrote:
I'm currently using Postfix 2.7, Dovecot 2.1, and the Dovecot LDA. I
have a pure virtual user environment stored in LDAP. My messages include
X-Original-To and Delivered-To headers.
On Sat, 07 Apr 2012 11:06:48 -0700
Daniel L. Miller articulated:
Unfortunately, the docs for the ltmp agent
http://www.postfix.org/lmtp.8.html don't say anything about adding
these headers. I tried asking on the Postfix list - didn't get much
of an answer.
I may be wrong; however, from
On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 3:16 AM, Willie Gillespie
wgillespie+dove...@es2eng.com wrote:
On 4/6/2012 3:52 AM, Thomas von Eyben wrote:
Test results:
CLIENT-1 is having the problems when CLIENT-2 is using all the
(100Mbps) bandwidth eg. copying files to MAIL-SRV.
If I move CLIENT-1 to CLIENT-3
Putting XFS on a singe RAID1 pair, as you seem to be describing above
for the multiple thin node case, and hitting one node with parallel
writes to multiple user mail dirs, you'll get less performance than
EXT3/4 on that mirror pair--possibly less than half, depending on the
size of the disks
On 4/7/2012 3:45 PM, Robin wrote:
Putting XFS on a singe RAID1 pair, as you seem to be describing above
for the multiple thin node case, and hitting one node with parallel
writes to multiple user mail dirs, you'll get less performance than
EXT3/4 on that mirror pair--possibly less than half,
