The executive summary is something like: when raid5 fails, because at that
point you effectively do a raid scrub you tend to suddenly notice a bunch
of other hidden problems which were lurking and your rebuild fails (this
and no raid will protect you from every failure. You have to do backups.
Has anyone tried or benchmarked ZFS, perhaps ZFS+NFS as backing store for
yes. long time ago. ZFS isn't useful for anything more than a toy. I/O
performance is just bad.
Hi,
I have some out of memory errors in my logs (file errors.txt attached)
I'm using dovecot 2.0.19, I can see some memory leaks fix in hg after
the 2.0.19 release but they seem related to imap-login service,
I attached my config too, is something wrong there? Should I really
increase the
El 29/06/12 07:32, Timo Sirainen escribió:
On 29.6.2012, at 5.18, Daniel Parthey wrote:
wouldn't it be better to use a syntax similar to other doveadm commands,
with labels for all arguments?
doveadm auth test -u user -p [pass]
doveadm auth cache flush -u [user]
doveadm auth cache stats
This
On 29.6.2012, at 9.35, Mailing List SVR wrote:
I have some out of memory errors in my logs (file errors.txt attached)
How large is your auth process's VSZ when it starts up and has handled a couple
of logins? It's possible that it's not leaking at all, you're just not giving
enough memory for
On 29.6.2012, at 10.13, Angel L. Mateo wrote:
Other command it could be usefull is to remove a temporal user-server
association in director. For example, I had a downtime in one server, so
users normally directed to this server is now been directed to other. Now I
want a user to get
Il 29/06/2012 09:19, Timo Sirainen ha scritto:
On 29.6.2012, at 9.35, Mailing List SVR wrote:
I have some out of memory errors in my logs (file errors.txt attached)
How large is your auth process's VSZ when it starts up and has handled a couple
of logins? It's possible that it's not leaking
On 29.6.2012, at 10.39, Mailing List SVR wrote:
Il 29/06/2012 09:19, Timo Sirainen ha scritto:
On 29.6.2012, at 9.35, Mailing List SVR wrote:
I have some out of memory errors in my logs (file errors.txt attached)
How large is your auth process's VSZ when it starts up and has handled a
Il 29/06/2012 09:45, Timo Sirainen ha scritto:
On 29.6.2012, at 10.39, Mailing List SVR wrote:
Il 29/06/2012 09:19, Timo Sirainen ha scritto:
On 29.6.2012, at 9.35, Mailing List SVR wrote:
I have some out of memory errors in my logs (file errors.txt attached)
How large is your auth
Is there, among the dovocot community, any preferred LDAP schema and attribute
to use for setting the home/mail storage location?
Some people seem to use the qmail schema, some a Jamm schema (whatever that
is), and Markus Effinger has even created a dovecot schema
Hello,
I have discovered a strange behaviour with director proxying...
I have a user, its assigned server is 155.54.211.164. The problem is
that I don't know why director sent him yesterday to a different server,
because my server was up all the time. Moreover, I'm using poolmon in
On 2012-06-28 4:35 PM, Ed W li...@wildgooses.com wrote:
On 28/06/2012 17:54, Charles Marcus wrote:
RAID10 also statistically has a much better chance of surviving a
multi drive failure than RAID5 or 6, because it will only die if two
drives in the same pair fail, and only then if the second one
On 2012-06-29 2:19 AM, Wojciech Puchar woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl
wrote:
Has anyone tried or benchmarked ZFS, perhaps ZFS+NFS as backing store for
yes. long time ago. ZFS isn't useful for anything more than a toy. I/O
performance is just bad.
Please stop with the FUD... 'long time ago'?
Kelsey Cummings wrote:
On 06/28/12 05:56, Ed W wrote:
So given the statistics show us that 2 disk failures are much more
common than we expect, and that silent corruption is likely occurring
within (larger) real world file stores, there really aren't many battle
tested options that can
On 2012-06-29 1:02 AM, Dr Josef Karthauser j...@tao.org.uk wrote:
I will never rely on a non-checksumming file system for production
use again, for data that is existed to persist over time.
Nice! I'm seriously considering buying a Nexenta Storage device if/when
our storage needs require
On 29/06/2012 12:15, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2012-06-28 4:35 PM, Ed W li...@wildgooses.com wrote:
On 28/06/2012 17:54, Charles Marcus wrote:
RAID10 also statistically has a much better chance of surviving a
multi drive failure than RAID5 or 6, because it will only die if two
drives in the
Hi,
we have configured userdb and passdb in the director and try to
iterate all users and pass the purge command via doveadm proxy to
port 19000 on the correct director backend host.
A single purge -u usern...@example.org via doveadm-proxy works correctly,
but iterating over some users
* Edgar Fuß e...@math.uni-bonn.de:
Is there, among the dovocot community, any preferred LDAP schema and
attribute to use for setting the home/mail storage location?
There are many. Here's another one:
http://www.postfix-buch.com/download/postfix-book.schema.gz
--
state of mind ()
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Sat, 2012-04-28 at 13:00 +0200, Daniel Parthey wrote:
we are experiencing similar sporadic data timeout issues with dovecot 2.0.20
as in http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/2011-June/059807.html
at least once a week. Some mails get temporarily deferred in the
Hello, I am new to dovecot and I am initially trying to setup a basic
imap proxy with password forwarding, I can start the dovecot service,
connect and give it my password, and that is where I hang. My config
is:
root@imap-test:/etc/dovecot# doveconf -n
# 2.0.19: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
# OS:
Jonathan Ryshpan schrieb:
It appears from the wiki that the word following the namespace
declarator (if this is the right word) should be either public,
shared, or private, and describes a property of the namespace being
declared.
AFAIS the word following the keyword namespace is the name
Hi Angel,
Angel L. Mateo wrote:
I have a user, its assigned server is 155.54.211.164. The problem
is that I don't know why director sent him yesterday to a different
server, because my server was up all the time. Moreover, I'm using
poolmon in director servers to check availability of final
On 6/28/2012 7:15 AM, Ed W wrote:
On 28/06/2012 13:01, Костырев Александр Алексеевич wrote:
somewhere in maillist I've seen RAID1+md concat+XFS being promoted as
mailstorage.
Does anybody in here actually use this setup?
I've decided to give it a try,
but ended up with not being able to
23 matches
Mail list logo
