[Dovecot] more info (more dsync problems)

2012-07-10 Thread Jeff Gustafson
Rerunning the dsync command right after the timeout (see previous message) gave me these errors: dsync-local(vmail): Error: remote: dsync-remote(vmail): Error: Corrupted dbox file /home/.incoming_mail_migrations/users/user%domain.com/mdbox/s torage/m.60 (around offset=807789): msg header has bad

[Dovecot] more dsync problems: Error: proxy client timed out

2012-07-10 Thread Jeff Gustafson
Hi all, I'm using dsync for backups. I recently upgraded to 2.1.7 due to issues with dsync mirror/backups. 2.1.7 fixed the issue with the guid conflict, but now I'm seeing this error on a couple of mailboxes: Error: proxy client timed out (waiting for output stream to flush, 0 bytes left)

Re: [Dovecot] doveadm purge -A via doveadm-proxy director fails after some users

2012-07-10 Thread Daniel Parthey
Timo Sirainen wrote: > On 29.6.2012, at 19.21, Daniel Parthey wrote: > > > Jun 29 15:40:31 10.129.3.249 dovecot: doveadm(use...@domain1.example.org): > > Error: user use...@domain1.example.org: Error reading configuration: > > net_connect_unix(/var/run/dovecot/config) failed: Permission denied >

Re: [Dovecot] getting rid of old spam from +spam Maildir ? [ auto purging spambox]

2012-07-10 Thread Andrzej A. Filip
On 07/10/2012 07:11 PM, Wojciech Puchar wrote: >>> if I simply delete mail files from the file system, is that a 'bad >>> thing' ? >>> [...] >> IMHO 7 days is dangerously too short. False positives during vacations >> happen too ;-) >> >> I would suggest at least 30 days (as used by Gmail). >> > or

Re: [Dovecot] getting rid of old spam from +spam Maildir ? [ auto purging spambox]

2012-07-10 Thread Wojciech Puchar
if I simply delete mail files from the file system, is that a 'bad thing' ? [...] IMHO 7 days is dangerously too short. False positives during vacations happen too ;-) I would suggest at least 30 days (as used by Gmail). or use spam system that NEVER actually receive something it thinks it is

[Dovecot] Make a whole mailbox read-only

2012-07-10 Thread Sandro Tosi
Hello, i've found an old thread [1] where it was stated that a whole mailbox can be made read-only only setting the according permissions on the filesystem side. [1] http://www.mailinglistarchive.com/html/dovecot@dovecot.org/2011-12/msg00300.html i'd like to check if it's still the only opt

Re: [Dovecot] getting rid of old spam from +spam Maildir ? [ auto purging spambox]

2012-07-10 Thread Andrzej A. Filip
On 07/10/2012 01:25 PM, Voytek Eymont wrote: > I'm trying to setup per user '+spam' delivery from amavis tags, so that > each user gets any mails tagged as spam to 'spam' Maildir via +spam > Dovecot lmtp delivery. > > after say 7 days I want to delete all spams older than 7 days, > if I simply dele

Re: [Dovecot] getting rid of old spam from +spam Maildir ?

2012-07-10 Thread Wojciech Puchar
Dovecot lmtp delivery. after say 7 days I want to delete all spams older than 7 days, if I simply delete mail files from the file system, is that a 'bad thing' ? i don't use lmtp so maybe i'm wrong but if you use maildir format just deleting/moving files always work properly

Re: [Dovecot] getting rid of old spam from +spam Maildir ?

2012-07-10 Thread Robert Schetterer
Am 10.07.2012 13:34, schrieb Robert Schetterer: > Am 10.07.2012 13:25, schrieb Voytek Eymont: >> I'm trying to setup per user '+spam' delivery from amavis tags, so that >> each user gets any mails tagged as spam to 'spam' Maildir via +spam >> Dovecot lmtp delivery. > > i have no amavis, i use a gl

Re: [Dovecot] getting rid of old spam from +spam Maildir ?

2012-07-10 Thread Robert Schetterer
Am 10.07.2012 13:25, schrieb Voytek Eymont: > I'm trying to setup per user '+spam' delivery from amavis tags, so that > each user gets any mails tagged as spam to 'spam' Maildir via +spam > Dovecot lmtp delivery. i have no amavis, i use a global sieve rule to deliver tagged mail into special Junk

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot 2.1.8 still tries to touch any mountpoint

2012-07-10 Thread Wojciech Puchar
why does dovecot touch any ever used fuse-mountpoint and scream at the next start that is no longer mounted? "If this is intentional, remove it with doveadm mount" why if i never called "doveadm" on any setup at all? Because you never read any docs.

[Dovecot] getting rid of old spam from +spam Maildir ?

2012-07-10 Thread Voytek Eymont
I'm trying to setup per user '+spam' delivery from amavis tags, so that each user gets any mails tagged as spam to 'spam' Maildir via +spam Dovecot lmtp delivery. after say 7 days I want to delete all spams older than 7 days, if I simply delete mail files from the file system, is that a 'bad thing

[Dovecot] dovecot 2.1.8 still tries to touch any mountpoint

2012-07-10 Thread Reindl Harald
why does dovecot touch any ever used fuse-mountpoint and scream at the next start that is no longer mounted? "If this is intentional, remove it with doveadm mount" why if i never called "doveadm" on any setup at all? Jul 10 09:10:56 rh dovecot: master: Dovecot v2.1.8 starting up (core dumps disa

Re: [Dovecot] different mail_max_userip settings

2012-07-10 Thread Federico Bianchi
On Tue, 10 Jul 2012, Stan Hoeppner wrote: On 7/10/2012 2:24 AM, Federico Bianchi wrote: Is it possible to have mail_max_userip set to a value for localhost (webmail) and to another value for everything else? mail_max_userip as the name suggests is a per user IMAP socket connection limit. S

Re: [Dovecot] different mail_max_userip settings

2012-07-10 Thread Stan Hoeppner
On 7/10/2012 2:24 AM, Federico Bianchi wrote: > > Is it possible to have mail_max_userip set to a value for localhost > (webmail) and to another value for everything else? mail_max_userip as the name suggests is a per user IMAP socket connection limit. So you should be able to set it to one valu

Re: [Dovecot] Howto add another disk storage

2012-07-10 Thread Timo Sirainen
On 10.7.2012, at 8.31, Frank Bonnet wrote: > Would it be possible to close this thread from Dovecot mailing-list ? Yeah, enough with this thread.

[Dovecot] different mail_max_userip settings

2012-07-10 Thread Federico Bianchi
Is it possible to have mail_max_userip set to a value for localhost (webmail) and to another value for everything else? Best regards Federico Bianchi Dipartimento di Storia delle Arti Universita` di Pisa