On 7/25/2012 3:56 AM, Steven Haigh wrote:
Hi all,
I've just migrated my mail system from procmail to managesieve/sieve
and I'm having trouble trying to duplicate a could of rules I used to
use in my procmail config.
One particular rule would be this:
:0 Wfh
* ^Sender:
Thanks for the reply Stephan!
Out of interest, how can I tell what version is installed? The system is
EL6.2 - but dovecot etc is installed via yum.
It currently has:
# rpm -qa | grep dovecot
dovecot-2.0.9-2.el6_1.1.x86_64
dovecot-pigeonhole-2.0.9-2.el6_1.1.x86_64
Op 7/25/2012 9:57 AM, Steven Haigh schreef:
Thanks for the reply Stephan!
Out of interest, how can I tell what version is installed? The system
is EL6.2 - but dovecot etc is installed via yum.
It currently has:
# rpm -qa | grep dovecot
dovecot-2.0.9-2.el6_1.1.x86_64
hi all :
mysql mailbox below :
CREATE TABLE `mailbox` (
`username` varchar(255) NOT NULL DEFAULT '',
`uid` varchar(255) NOT NULL DEFAULT '',
`password` varchar(255) NOT NULL DEFAULT '',
`clearpwd` varchar(128) NOT NULL DEFAULT '',
`name` varchar(255) NOT NULL DEFAULT '',
`mailhost`
On 25/07/2012 7:12 PM, Stephan Bosch wrote:
Op 7/25/2012 9:57 AM, Steven Haigh schreef:
Thanks for the reply Stephan!
Out of interest, how can I tell what version is installed? The system
is EL6.2 - but dovecot etc is installed via yum.
It currently has:
# rpm -qa | grep dovecot
* Ed W li...@wildgooses.com:
Oh, sorry. Why doveadm though? Why not attack the filesystem directly?
It's a bit hard with mdbox: mailboxes.
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Campus Benjamin Franklin
Hindenburgdamm 30 |
On 25.7.2012, at 13.43, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Ed W li...@wildgooses.com:
Oh, sorry. Why doveadm though? Why not attack the filesystem directly?
It's a bit hard with mdbox: mailboxes.
Actually it is allowed to simply mv the directory names, but I don't think
that's all that much
* Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi:
Actually it is allowed to simply mv the directory names, but I don't
think that's all that much easier than just using doveadm rename.
My point exactly. It's such a nice tool, so why not use a tool which
keeps the integrity of the mailboxes and folders if it
On 25.7.2012, at 13.54, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
The way I'd do this is to just do doveadm mailbox list, put the strings
through some regexps and doveadm rename if necessary. Repeat for all
users.
Yes, something along those lines. It's just that I find it hard to
craft a regexp which does
On 24.7.2012, at 16.46, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
this is a mailing list dedicated to Dovecot and the protocols POP, IMAP and
MANAGESIEVE with the one or the other detour to storage.
Greylisting and other Anti-Spam techniques, as discussed in this thread,
truely are off-topic. Please take
Am 25.07.2012 13:31, schrieb Timo Sirainen:
On 24.7.2012, at 16.46, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
this is a mailing list dedicated to Dovecot and the protocols POP, IMAP and
MANAGESIEVE with the one or the other detour to storage.
Greylisting and other Anti-Spam techniques, as discussed in
As per this discussion almost a year ago, was there any attempt to
introduce failover mode planned Timo?
On Mon, 2011-09-12 at 13:26 -0700, Paul B. Henson wrote:
Perhaps it could be an option, either load balancing between all
available servers, or only using later listed servers when the
On 25/07/2012 11:59, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 25.7.2012, at 13.54, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
The way I'd do this is to just do doveadm mailbox list, put the strings
through some regexps and doveadm rename if necessary. Repeat for all
users.
Yes, something along those lines. It's just that I find
On 2012-07-24 2:36 AM, Federico Bianchi fbian...@arte.unipi.it wrote:
On Tue, 24 Jul 2012, fy wrote:
what anti-spam for you used ? dspam?spammassian? amavisd-new ? what is
best ?
If you can afford using a separate boundary SMTP (and, thanks to
virtual machines, this is much more common than
Den 2012-07-24 05:58, fy skrev:
what anti-spam for you used ? dspam?spammassian? amavisd-new ? what
is
best ?
depends of your gool, if you like to have user controls, then dovecot,
dovecot-antispam, with dspam is best, save the spamassassin resources
here
amavisd-new is NOT an spam filter
Hello,
is it possible to get a recipient of an email while being in the zlib plugin
context ?
Thank you !
-BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-
mQINBE9zuXMBEADG8O1eZpo8gxMFcQ2Bf4K/n2MvDoH5WDnffvLQcswkigKedicz
lNNQzMTsk31gH8Hkl3upEK1jd0yfAmB20puITl52Mlzm3Xe6p8JDDZdKBppIaZI+
Am 25.07.2012 21:35, schrieb Benny Pedersen:
currently here i plan to drop spamassassin and only use dspam via dovecot
antispam plugin, it save me resources on
dns, with lately here is unstable like hell, and talking to dns hosters helps
nothing :/
why in the world do you not setup our
Stop replying here and start writing to http://wiki2.dovecot.org/AntiSpam - I
added some kind of a template now. Thread closed.
Den 2012-07-24 08:20, Radim Kolar skrev:
what anti-spam for you used ? dspam?spammassian? amavisd-new ? what
is
best ?
i got best results with dspam + graylist. but dspam is not scalable
solution, it works only if you do not have many users.
depends on backend imho
i know a hoster that only
We are running dovecot-1.2.10 on a Solaris 10 x86 host.
Starting on July 24 I started seeing the following type lock files I the
/var/mail directory.
-rw-rw-rw- 1 agab mail 0 Jul 24 10:08
agabriel.lock.1343138908.28535.hardy.purdue.edu
-rw-rw-rw- 1 agab mail 0
Dovecot doesn't create lock files named like these.
On 25.7.2012, at 22.50, McGraw, Robert P wrote:
We are running dovecot-1.2.10 on a Solaris 10 x86 host.
Starting on July 24 I started seeing the following type lock files I the
/var/mail directory.
-rw-rw-rw- 1 agab mail
From: McGraw, Robert P rmcg...@purdue.edu
We are running dovecot-1.2.10 on a Solaris 10 x86 host.
Starting on July 24 I started seeing the following type lock files I the
/var/mail directory.
-rw-rw-rw- 1 agab mail 0 Jul 24 10:08
agabriel.lock.1343138908.28535.hardy.purdue.edu
Hello All,
Have anyone met the problem I am struggling with at the moment ?
The problem is when I run two instances of dovecot 2.1.8 which are one
for proxy-director and another one is a regular one on the same server
then I have big amount of strange entries in the /var/log/mail.err:
Jul 26
23 matches
Mail list logo
