El 23/11/12 08:07, Timo Sirainen escribió:
On 16.11.2012, at 12.11, Angel L. Mateo wrote:
We are deploying shared mailboxes in our mail system. We are running
2.1.9 and mail backend is maildir.
As described at http://wiki.dovecot.org/SharedMailboxes/Shared when
shared
Hello,
# doveadm mailbox list -u user001
doveadm(user001): Error: user user001: Auth PASS lookup failed
doveadm(user001): Fatal: passdb lookup failed
Are you running this on a Dovecot proxy? It looks like doveadm wants to do a
passdb lookup to find out which server should handle this
Hi, thanks for the reply. I'm new to all this. How can I tell if postfix is
deferring messages, or if it thinks they've been delieverd? Where is the
postfix log?
How do I feed a message to dovecot-lda manually, as mailman?
How do I use LMTP instead of LDA?
*/#!/*JoePea
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at
Hi, I tried changing dovecot-lda to deliver in master.cf and also added the
acl plugin to the lda protocol like yours. It still won't work though.
*/#!/*JoePea
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 9:04 AM, Fi4IT - Daniel Fischer
dfisc...@fi4it.dewrote:
Hello Joe,
i use this:
main.cf
virtual_transport
At 2AM -0800 on 26/11/12 you (/#!/JoePea) wrote:
Hi, thanks for the reply. I'm new to all this. How can I tell if postfix is
deferring messages, or if it thinks they've been delieverd? Where is the
postfix log?
You can tell if a message is still in the queue with 'mailq'. You can
find out why
Hi all,
I have some IMAP servers fronted with separate perdition processes, and it
would be ideal if I could collapse this down to having dovecot do both the IMAP
proxying and the IMAP serving at the same time on the same IP addresses.
One of the fields in my LDAP entries contains the
On 26 Nov 2012, at 4:24 PM, Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm wrote:
I have some IMAP servers fronted with separate perdition processes, and it
would be ideal if I could collapse this down to having dovecot do both the
IMAP proxying and the IMAP serving at the same time on the same IP
At 4PM +0200 on 26/11/12 you (Graham Leggett) wrote:
Hi all,
I have some IMAP servers fronted with separate perdition processes,
and it would be ideal if I could collapse this down to having dovecot
do both the IMAP proxying and the IMAP serving at the same time on the
same IP addresses.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I'm running Dovecot v2.1 and enabled the
lmtp_rcpt_check_quota
option in conf.d/20-lmtp.conf, because I just found it in the sample
config.
Is this option working somewhere?
When I have the option enabled, I get _no_ response in the
Problem : All vacation autoreplies come from the postmaster address.
Expected behavior : vacation notice comes from the user who set the
vacation.
Platform : Dovecot 2.1.7 on Debian Squeeze ( See below for example
reply, sieve script and dovecot -n output)
Any help appreciated!
Am 26.11.2012 18:31, schrieb cfowler:
Problem : All vacation autoreplies come from the postmaster address.
is not really the postmaster address, its special for the mailer daemon
Expected behavior : vacation notice comes from the user who set the
vacation.
at my knowledge, does not work
At 5PM + on 26/11/12 you (cfowler) wrote:
Problem : All vacation autoreplies come from the postmaster address.
Expected behavior : vacation notice comes from the user who set the
vacation.
Platform : Dovecot 2.1.7 on Debian Squeeze ( See below for example
reply, sieve script and
On 26-11-2012 17:59, Ben Morrow wrote:
At 5PM + on 26/11/12 you (cfowler) wrote:
Problem : All vacation autoreplies come from the postmaster address.
Expected behavior : vacation notice comes from the user who set the
vacation.
Platform : Dovecot 2.1.7 on Debian Squeeze ( See below for
message sent from the sieve-vacation does not contain dkim signature
how to configure sieve to send messages via smtp transport with signing?
may be this is the best way
dovecot unix - n n - - pipe
flags=DRhu user=vmail:vmail argv=/usr/lib/dovecot/deliver -f
${sender} -d ${recipient} -a ${recipient}
parameter-a $ {recipient}
allow to keep the recipient's address in the headers from:
19.11.12
On 11/26/2012 07:58 PM Николай Клименко wrote:
message sent from the sieve-vacation does not contain dkim signature
how to configure sieve to send messages via smtp transport with signing?
Configure a submission host:
So this is a step in the right direction. But still far less than
optimal. The read/write lock contention on mbox is unnecessarily eating
up system resources (mainly memory), and causing unnecessary delivery
delays to the mailbox. You should really start looking at migrating to
maildir.
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 08:36:37AM +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 9.11.2012, at 2.49, Kelsey Cummings wrote:
One of our dovecot backend servers ran into a problem with it's auth
process a few days ago. This doesn't appear to be the error logged when
dovecot hits its internal limit so I'm
thx for answer
i use 1.x
I found the solution
in main.cf
content_filter=smtp-amavis:[127.0.0.1]:10026 #filter with dkim
and in master.cf
public_ip_external_user:smtp inet n - - -
- smtpd
#some smtpd_recipient_restrictions rules
#some
On 11/26/2012 6:31 PM, cfowler wrote:
Problem : All vacation autoreplies come from the postmaster address.
Expected behavior : vacation notice comes from the user who set the
vacation.
Platform : Dovecot 2.1.7 on Debian Squeeze ( See below for example
reply, sieve script and dovecot -n output)
On 11/26/2012 6:59 PM, Ben Morrow wrote:
At 5PM + on 26/11/12 you (cfowler) wrote:
This setting turns that check off, in which case Pigeonhole
will send a vacation response (despite the standard) but sends it from
Postmaster.
Actually, this shouldn't have happened. Originally, it would
You do know that inline comments as you have below are not supported in
postfix config files and WILL cause unexpected behavior depending on
where they are and what they contain, right?
On 2012-11-26 3:13 PM, Николай Клименко klimenk...@theitidea.ru wrote:
thx for answer
i use 1.x
I found
yes of course
this is only remarks
for easily understanding
27.11.12 0:33, Charles Marcus пишет:
You do know that inline comments as you have below are not supported
in postfix config files and WILL cause unexpected behavior depending
on where they are and what they contain, right?
On
Hi Ben,
Indeed, the mailq command shows my test messages sitting there with mail
transport unavailable.
┌─[11:48:22/hypership/root/~]
└─╼ mailq
-Queue ID- --Size-- Arrival Time -Sender/Recipient---
2DCCB580C01 1901 Mon Nov 26 11:45:02 trus...@gmail.com
On 11/26/2012 1:58 PM, 1st WebDesigns wrote:
So this is a step in the right direction. But still far less than
optimal. The read/write lock contention on mbox is unnecessarily eating
up system resources (mainly memory), and causing unnecessary delivery
delays to the mailbox. You should
Thanks, all your comments are noted.
As I said, you can migrate users individually. You could easily do 10
users a day during coffee breaks etc and be done in a month plus. Do 40
a day and you're done in 10 days. The only time you'll burn is in the
learning curve, not the actual mailbox
At 6PM + on 26/11/12 you (cfowler) wrote:
On 26-11-2012 17:59, Ben Morrow wrote:
At 5PM + on 26/11/12 you (cfowler) wrote:
Problem : All vacation autoreplies come from the postmaster address.
Expected behavior : vacation notice comes from the user who set the
vacation.
On 11/26/2012 3:39 PM, 1st WebDesigns wrote:
Thanks, all your comments are noted.
As I said, you can migrate users individually. You could easily do 10
users a day during coffee breaks etc and be done in a month plus. Do 40
a day and you're done in 10 days. The only time you'll burn is in
On 26.11.2012, at 18.07, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
I'm running Dovecot v2.1 and enabled the
lmtp_rcpt_check_quota
option in conf.d/20-lmtp.conf, because I just found it in the sample config.
Is this option working somewhere?
When I have the option enabled, I get _no_ response in the RCPT
On 23.11.2012, at 17.53, Sven Hartge wrote:
BTW. Do you have multiple Dovecot backend servers? Director works
only when you're not using shared mailboxes..
You can't reliably do it if the mailboxes are accessed directly via
NFS. The current idea to solve this is to use imapc backend with
On 27.11.2012, at 3.00, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Now the mentioned quirk: Because all connections on the shared-server
are made to the same user shared and are coming from very few IPs
(the 1 to X user-servers), you need to set a very high
mail_max_userip_connections value.
I set mine to 1000
On 23.11.2012, at 9.46, Nikita Koshikov wrote:
Hello list,
Here is the problem:
I have few:
passdb {
#1
}
passdb {
#2
}
And relative userdb sections. If user not found in 1) section it fallbacks
to next one - it's expected and right, IMHO. But when the user exists in
both section
On 22.11.2012, at 17.06, Richard Platel wrote:
We use Dovecot for IMAP and POP (but not LDA), we want to do something when a
user has an INBOX that becomes empty, or becomes not empty (set a flag in
memcached, but that's not really important).
I'm writing a plugin (for Dovecot 2.1.7).
On 21.11.2012, at 19.34, Andreas Kasenides wrote:
I could not determine if when using filesystem quotas
(http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Quota/FS)
Dovecot will use the reported quota and limits without the need of
configuring them
via quota_rules. Is this possible somehow? Such a feature would
Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
On 23.11.2012, at 17.53, Sven Hartge wrote:
BTW. Do you have multiple Dovecot backend servers? Director works
only when you're not using shared mailboxes..
You can't reliably do it if the mailboxes are accessed directly via
NFS. The current idea to solve
On 18.11.2012, at 16.54, Robert Strötgen wrote:
Nov 18, 2012 2:59:09 PM org.apache.solr.common.SolrException log
SEVERE: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Invalid UTF-8 start byte
0xfc (at char #25214836, byte #26687495)
Annoying. I guess these fix it:
On 27.11.2012, at 3.24, Sven Hartge wrote:
For implementing shared mailboxes between all user servers, I think
what would need to be developed is:
imapc_host = m-st-sh-01.example.com
imapc_master_user = %u
imapc_user = shared
Somehow being able to set imapc_user = %%u where %%u expands
On 21.11.2012, at 15.05, Ramon Frontera wrote:
we have a problem with our director proxy configuration.
When we run on proxy server the doveadm command with -A switch, fails with
the error:
# doveadm -D quota get -A
doveadm(user1): Debug: auth input: user=user1 proxy starttls=any-cert
On 11/26/2012 5:50 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 18.11.2012, at 16.54, Robert Strötgen wrote:
Nov 18, 2012 2:59:09 PM org.apache.solr.common.SolrException log
SEVERE: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Invalid UTF-8 start byte
0xfc (at char #25214836, byte #26687495)
Annoying. I guess these
On 11/26/2012 5:50 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 18.11.2012, at 16.54, Robert Strötgen wrote:
Nov 18, 2012 2:59:09 PM org.apache.solr.common.SolrException log
SEVERE: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Invalid UTF-8 start byte
0xfc (at char #25214836, byte #26687495)
Annoying. I guess these
On 27.11.2012, at 6.51, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
On 11/26/2012 5:50 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 18.11.2012, at 16.54, Robert Strötgen wrote:
Nov 18, 2012 2:59:09 PM org.apache.solr.common.SolrException log
SEVERE: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Invalid UTF-8 start byte
0xfc (at char
On 27.11.2012, at 7.50, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Nov 26, 2012 8:49:29 PM org.apache.solr.common.SolrException log
SEVERE: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Illegal character ((CTRL-CHAR,
code 8))
at [row,col {unknown-source}]: [1011144,197790]
Something's wrong. The Solr code was already
1. clear the log
2. Send message
3. show mail.log mail.err
you should add following in main.cf
dovecot_destination_recipient_limit = 1
27.11.12 1:15, /#!/JoePea пишет:
Hi, thanks for the reply,
What's the difference between dovecot-lda and deliver? Are they the
same? The manpages are
On 26.11.2012, at 22.03, Kelsey Cummings wrote:
auth: Error: malloc: 58012: Cannot allocate memory
auth: Error: Unable to allocate memory for mutexes from the region
auth: Error: PANIC: Cannot allocate memory
auth: passwd(test,1.1.1.1,8HTlNHzNIQBAjhKC): unknown user
..
Memory leak maybe?
On 27.11.2012, at 8.39, Timo Sirainen wrote:
userdb {
driver = passwd
}
Both of these lookups should be done by auth-worker processes. So why is it
the auth process that complains?
Because of a bug in v2.0.16+ :(
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.1/rev/8e5d9d88e250
As a workaround you
Hi
I have observed that after deleting a mailbox and removing the user from
the userdb, immediately accessing the mail account via POP3/IMAP causes
Dovecot to auto create an empty mailbox, because the userdb/passdb
details are still cached for 10minutes. Is there any option to tell
Dovecot
On 27.11.2012, at 8.48, Dominic Malolepszy wrote:
I have observed that after deleting a mailbox and removing the user from the
userdb, immediately accessing the mail account via POP3/IMAP causes Dovecot
to auto create an empty mailbox, because the userdb/passdb details are still
cached for
On 2.11.2012, at 17.55, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
Please add the information to this error, which socket has the problem and
which uid access is and what is expected.
For instance, when the quota dict request fails, because of permission
problems, you get a very detailed info about the
Could you try with the attached patch, and with only the problematic
client running? What does it log (the beginning of the session until it
starts repeating the same lines)?
On Sat, 2012-11-24 at 00:16 -0800, Erik A Johnson wrote:
Thanks, Timo. Nope, still an infinite loop. Anything I can try
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 3:04 AM, Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
On 23.11.2012, at 9.46, Nikita Koshikov wrote:
Hello list,
Here is the problem:
I have few:
passdb {
#1
}
passdb {
#2
}
And relative userdb sections. If user not found in 1) section it
fallbacks
to next
On 27.11.2012, at 9.37, Nikita Koshikov wrote:
Here is the problem:
I have few:
passdb {
#1
}
passdb {
#2
}
And relative userdb sections. If user not found in 1) section it
fallbacks
to next one - it's expected and right, IMHO. But when the user exists in
both section and password
51 matches
Mail list logo
