> Hmm. The AUTH_PASSWORD wasn't really an intentional addition .. but
> I guess it can stay there. Some 10 years ago that might not have been
> such a good idea since there were still some systems where process
> environment variables were readable to all users in the system, but
> I doubt there ex
On 8.4.2013, at 1.51, Rich Wales wrote:
> When I use the mdbox format, there are a bunch of LIST and LSUB commands
> whose responses mention INBOX.Trash with the \Noselect and \HasChildren
> flags (the Trash folder for this particular account happens to contain
> subfolders). Before trying to sa
Hi Timo
In my dsync replication test setup I now get Permission denied errors:
Apr 8 10:04:33 fumailsynctest2 dovecot: dsync-remote(): Error:
net_connect_unix(/var/run/dovecot/replicator-doveadm) failed: Permission denied
I haven't noticed them before rc6. Bug or something wrong with my config
On 8.4.2013, at 11.22, Oli Schacher wrote:
> In my dsync replication test setup I now get Permission denied errors:
>
> Apr 8 10:04:33 fumailsynctest2 dovecot: dsync-remote(): Error:
> net_connect_unix(/var/run/dovecot/replicator-doveadm) failed: Permission
> denied
>
> I haven't noticed the
On Sat, 2013-04-06 at 01:09 -0700, David Benfell wrote:
> > Are your certificate chains valid? Simply saying "isn't working" is
> > almost a requirement for a *sigh*
> > log output please, or a better description than "isn't working" ;)
> Yes, the certificate chains were screwed up. And you
I haven't had too much luck with gdb:
0xfec4c554 in ?? ()
(gdb) cont
Continuing.
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0xfebd710c in ?? ()
(gdb) bt full
#0 0xfebd710c in ?? ()
No symbol table info available.
(gdb) quit
The program is running. Quit anyway (and detach it)? (y or n)
On 8.4.2013, at 11.54, Pigi wrote:
> I haven't had too much luck with gdb:
>
> 0xfec4c554 in ?? ()
> (gdb) cont
> Continuing.
>
> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> 0xfebd710c in ?? ()
> (gdb) bt full
> #0 0xfebd710c in ?? ()
> No symbol table info available.
> (gdb) quit
>
On Monday 08 April 2013, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 8.4.2013, at 11.54, Pigi wrote:
>
>
> gdb is just confused. Try another way if it works:
>
> gdb /usr/local/libexec/dovecot/imap 16400
> cont
> bt full
>
>
Timo,
I took a sligtly different approach:
gdb /usr/local/dovecot/libexec/dovecot
On 8.4.2013, at 12.19, Pigi wrote:
>> gdb /usr/local/libexec/dovecot/imap 16400
..
> I took a sligtly different approach:
> gdb /usr/local/dovecot/libexec/dovecot/indexer-worker `ps -ef | grep
> indexer-worker | grep -v grep |awk '{print $2}' `
>
> thus attaching to indexer-worker, which I th
Hi
I enabled quota + warnings in my replication test setup and now
whenever a mail gets delivered the quota is counted twice (probably due
to both servers using the same mysql quota backend) and quota warnings
are fired too early. After a doveadm quota recalc -u the
quota is correct again. How do
Well that is not very scalable as we always ask first database no matter
what. What if I have the same user in both databases (ldap)?
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 12:36 AM, Daniel Parthey <
daniel.part...@informatik.tu-chemnitz.de> wrote:
> Pavel Dimow wrote:
> > Just to be clear my goal is to have mu
You could put (%l=1.2.3.4) in the ldap filter. But I guess it still gets sent
to the LDAP server. The best solution would be:
local 1.2.3.4 {
userdb {
..
}
}
But that doesn't work yet.
With v2.2 you can do multiple queries. So you could have one query to translate
IP address to the dom
On 8.4.2013, at 13.05, Oli Schacher wrote:
> I enabled quota + warnings in my replication test setup and now
> whenever a mail gets delivered the quota is counted twice (probably due
> to both servers using the same mysql quota backend)
Yes. Dovecot doesn't know that they are the same quota back
On 8.4.2013, at 10.00, Heiko Schlichting wrote:
>> Hmm. The AUTH_PASSWORD wasn't really an intentional addition .. but
>> I guess it can stay there. Some 10 years ago that might not have been
>> such a good idea since there were still some systems where process
>> environment variables were reada
Thank you Timo, then I guess I will runing two instances of dovecot one for
each domain until
local 1.2.3.4 {
userdb {
..
}
}
becomes ready :)
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 12:14 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> You could put (%l=1.2.3.4) in the ldap filter. But I guess it still gets
> sent to the
Timo wrote:
> All the OSes made the environment private 10-15 years ago. I think it's
> pretty safe to assume that older multiuser systems won't be running
> Dovecot with checkpassword backend.
The checkpassword interface is used in many different ways:
I found checkpassword the easiest way to im
On 7.4.2013, at 14.19, dovecot.pk...@dfgh.net wrote:
> My impression is that openssl will always try to use CRLs. If
> "ssl_require_crl = no"
> dovecot will use CRLs but tries to ignore openssl error codes
> X509_V_ERR_UNABLE_TO_GET_CRL and X509_V_ERR_CRL_HAS_EXPIRED.
>
> This is done in ssl_veri
On 8.4.2013, at 13.42, Heiko Schlichting wrote:
> The checkpassword interface is used in many different ways:
>
> I found checkpassword the easiest way to implement authentication against
> FreeRADIUS. Using a perl script with
>
>$input = IO::Handle->new_from_fd(3, "r");
>
> and
>
>my
On 8.4.2013, at 1.32, Bob Gustafson wrote:
> Ok, how is this for a scheme:
>
> 1) Initially rsync Maildir to destination system
> 2) Do initial 'dsync backup' from Maildir to sdbox on destination system
> 3) Do a 2nd rsync of new Maildir data from live system to destination
> system, but don't c
On 2013-04-07 22:51, Pavel Dimow wrote:
Why does dovecot does not expand %l to local ip address?
what it it does not contain an ip address ?, like "rm -f /"
--
senders that put my email into body content will deliver it to my own
trashcan, so if you like to get reply, dont do it
Am 08.04.2013 13:18, schrieb Benny Pedersen:
> On 2013-04-07 22:51, Pavel Dimow wrote:
>
>> Why does dovecot does not expand %l to local ip address?
>
> what it it does not contain an ip address ?, like "rm -f /"
what is your f**ing problem?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signat
On Mon, 8 Apr 2013 13:15:54 +0300
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> There's no way to make quota work reliably that way. You need to use
> different quota backends. Either two mysql databases (or tables), or
> the other Dovecot could simply be using a dict file quota.
>
ok, thanks for the clarification.
On 8.4.2013, at 14.56, Oli Schacher wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Apr 2013 13:15:54 +0300
> Timo Sirainen wrote:
>
>
>> There's no way to make quota work reliably that way. You need to use
>> different quota backends. Either two mysql databases (or tables), or
>> the other Dovecot could simply be using a
Hi, I've some troubles setting up the dict based quota plugin for mdbox, it
always returns a error when lmtp tries to deliver an e-mail:
Apr 8 12:40:16 mb07 dovecot: lmtp(3001, asma...@ull.es): Error:
fstat(/sharedfs/10.4.1.107/ull.es/54/asmarre/dovecot-quota.lock) failed: No
such file or directo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 7 Apr 2013, Pavel Dimow wrote:
Just to be clear my goal is to have multiple domains on multiple addresses
but use one dovecot instance and to let users logging without @domain part.
If %l is expanded in the LDAP query, you could add an att
On Monday 08 April 2013, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 8.4.2013, at 12.19, Pigi wrote:
>
> > Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> > 0xfebd65dc in _malloc_unlocked () from /lib/libc.so.1
> > (gdb) bt full
> > #0 0xfebd65dc in _malloc_unlocked () from /lib/libc.so.1
> > No symbol tab
Can somebody, please, point me in the right direction in finding a
COMPLETE and EXACT definition of the Dovecot configuration hierarchy.
In other words what configuration options exist both at the top level
but also
at each subconfiguration elements (ex. sections etc).
While my C is a bit rusty
On Mon, 8 Apr 2013 15:14:18 +0300
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > ok, thanks for the clarification. Using two different tables does
> > the trick. I'll probably also have to disable the quota-warning
> > scripts on one of the servers. Currently, both servers run the
> > script when a account goes overqu
My need at the moment is only a *one* time deal.
I just need to copy/convert all of the messages over to the new system
and new (sdbox) format *once*. Then all of the clients can start from
zero to build their caches based on the new mail box (not that many
clients).
---
I will take a look at t
Hello all,
I am trying to do something very simple - at least thats what I thought.
I have some fs, it contains folders and subfolders with email files ordered
like maildir. Now I try to set up dovecot on top simply to let some imap
account watch these email files. But I cannot see any folders at
Interesting, but this means that we need to have one tree with all users
(where each user have additional attribute containing local ip), instead we
now have two separate trees because we use this for other authentication
purposes.
Thank you for sharing your thoughts Steffen
On Mon, Apr 8, 201
Le 07/04/2013 22:56, Timo Sirainen a écrit :
> On Sun, 2013-04-07 at 21:47 +0200, to...@starbridge.org wrote:
>> since I've upgraded to 2.2.rc5 (c24783148d78), I've got the previous
>> error again:
>> It's happening on a large mailbox on almost every emails, with Horde 5
>> webmail client (works fi
Hi altogether,
I am switching from dbmail 2.2 to dovecot 2.1.7, and I was able to do a
successful transition of IMAP. But I
had a very hard time with receiving mail, and in the end -- after loads of
reading and debugging -- I broke
down and failed. This is why I am asking you for your kind help.
OK, success: see timings (real nn) below commands.
Initial copy of Maildir from live system to test sys (14G of data)
rsync -ar --times hoho4:/home/bobgus/Maildir/ /home/bobgus/Maildir
real 37m
Then 1st 'dsync -R backup maildir:~/Maildir'
real 828m
Then 2nd rsync to pick up new mail - **don't t
On 08-04-2013 22:39, Matthias Hofer wrote:
Hi altogether,
I am switching from dbmail 2.2 to dovecot 2.1.7, and I was able to do
a successful transition of IMAP. But I
had a very hard time with receiving mail, and in the end -- after
loads of reading and debugging -- I broke
down and failed. This
On 4/8/2013 8:16 PM, Giam Teck Choon wrote:
Hi,
When I compile Pigeonhole v0.3.4 with Dovecot v2.1.16 until make check
output as below from my rpmbuild output:
Test case: ./tests/extensions/mailbox/execute.svtest:
1: Test 'MailboxExists - None exist' SUCCEEDED
2: Test 'MailboxExists - Not a
Timo,
I tried importing the anonymized file, and there were no errors. So, it's
something with the actual data. UTF-8 issues?
While I can't send you a raw customer's mailbox, one of the failures is a
'role' account mailbox, with no critical/useful data in it.
Here is a link (expires in 30 d
On Thu, 4 Apr 2013 22:21:43 +0300 Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 3.4.2013, at 10.59, Christian Balzer wrote:
>
> > I'm looking into deploying dovecot as a proxy, currently using
> > perdition. Have been using dovecot on the actual servers for years,
> > nearly a decade. So far just 1.x, but for the p
38 matches
Mail list logo
