El 30/04/13 11:22, Jan-Frode Myklebust escribió:
Wasn't there also some issue with cleanup of attachments ? Not being able
to delete the last copy, or something. I did some testing of using SIS on a
In tests I have done (with dovecot 2.1.16) cleanup is done well. When
the last copy of the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 30 Apr 2013, forum wrote:
Now i have found the solution.
It seems to help to ask you. ;)
The solution was to change from
listen = [::]
to
listen = *, [::]
There is no explanation for it - just try and error ...
Hmm, [::] - in6addr_any
Hello Steffen,
Am 02.05.2013 10:17, schrieb Steffen Kaiser:
On Tue, 30 Apr 2013, forum wrote:
Now i have found the solution.
It seems to help to ask you. ;)
The solution was to change from
listen = [::]
to
listen = *, [::]
There is no explanation for it - just try and error ...
Hmm, [::]
Hello,
I'm in the process of finalizing the spec for my new dovecot VM, and
this is the last question I need to address...
I've read until I'm just about decided on XFS, but I have no experience
with it (been using reiserfs on my old box (@ 8 yrs old now), and never
had a problem (knock on
On 2013-04-30 8:00 PM, Tim Groeneveld t...@timgws.com.au wrote:
After thinking about it a little bit more, I have determined
that just recombining the messages to send them to the client
will be too intensive, and will cause extra latencies when
retrieving emails.
Scratching my head trying to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Charles Marcus said the following on 02/05/2013 13:16:
So, anyone (Stan?) have any suggestions? Should I go with EXT4? Or XFS with
just the defaults? Or XFS with one or more tuned parameters?
Expecially when you are working in virtual
Il 02/05/2013 13:16, Charles Marcus ha scritto:
Hello,
I'm in the process of finalizing the spec for my new dovecot VM, and
this is the last question I need to address...
I've read until I'm just about decided on XFS, but I have no experience
with it (been using reiserfs on my old box (@ 8 yrs
First - I'm subscribed to the list, please don't reply all and send
people two copies of your email.
On 2013-05-01 11:00 AM, Gregory Sloop gr...@sloop.net wrote:
I don't have to shotgun a million lines of logs and other irrelevant
data for people here to troll through.
Why would anyone need
Zitat von Charles Marcus cmar...@media-brokers.com:
Hello,
I'm in the process of finalizing the spec for my new dovecot VM, and
this is the last question I need to address...
I've read until I'm just about decided on XFS, but I have no
experience with it (been using reiserfs on my old
Thanks for the replies...
On 2013-05-02 7:54 AM, Luigi Rosa li...@luigirosa.com wrote:
The I/O cascading is in essence the muptiplying factor of each disk write at
application level. Consider a SQL UPDATE statement: you have date written on
database and trasaction log. Each file will have its
Am 02.05.2013 15:17, schrieb Charles Marcus:
but what I'm still unsure of for a VM
environment is the delaylog and nobarrier options.
Are these recommended/optimal for a VM? Running on ESXi (does it matter what
hypervisor ie being used)?
barriers does not help you much or are implicit
Il 02/05/2013 15:17, Charles Marcus ha scritto:
man mount doesn't show delaylog, nobarrier or noquota as valid mount
options... ?
Yes, they are available on RHEL 6.x.
since 2.6.35, xfs had a new mount option '-o delaylog', which improved
a lot metadata operations. From 2.6.39 this option is
On 2013-05-02 9:12 AM, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote:
IMHO if you say VM than the filesystem inside the guest doesn't
matter that much.
Well... my understanding is that things can break rather badly if you
use reiserfs for the host, and then use reiserfs for one of the
On 2013-05-02 9:51 AM, Alessio Cecchi ales...@skye.it wrote:
Il 02/05/2013 15:17, Charles Marcus ha scritto:
man mount doesn't show delaylog, nobarrier or noquota as valid mount
options... ?
Yes, they are available on RHEL 6.x.
since 2.6.35, xfs had a new mount option '-o delaylog', which
On 30.4.2013, at 0.06, Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
On 29.4.2013, at 23.43, Mike Abbott michael.abb...@apple.com wrote:
Dovecot-2.2.1 does not appear to support URLs specified via
non-synchronizing literals
Or synchronizing literals either:
b2 append inbox catenate (url {8}
b2
On 29.4.2013, at 21.37, Mike Abbott michael.abb...@apple.com wrote:
I'm pleased to see that dovecot-2.2 includes support for RFCs 4467 and 4469
(URLAUTH and CATENATE). I have begun testing these features (in
dovecot-2.2.1) and comparing their functionality against Apple's
implementation.
On 30.4.2013, at 0.12, Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
On 29.4.2013, at 21.40, Mike Abbott michael.abb...@apple.com wrote:
Dovecot-2.2.1 allows empty messages to be APPENDed when using CATENATE:
b1 append inbox catenate (text {0+}
)
b1 OK [APPENDUID 1366726248 12] Append completed.
On 30.4.2013, at 4.07, Mike Abbott michael.abb...@apple.com wrote:
Dovecot-2.2.1's imap processes crash reliably when they use an IMAP URL with
an invalid access specifier. A backtrace and some debug output follows. The
crash is likely caused by imap_urlauth_fetch_parsed() returning 0
Am 02.05.2013 17:31, schrieb Charles Marcus:
On 2013-05-02 10:45 AM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
man mount is very generic and doe snot cover any option
there is also no man mount.ntfs while mount.ntfs command exists
?
man mount, at least mine, shows first the FILESYSTEM
On 26.4.2013, at 11.57, Christian Balzer ch...@gol.com wrote:
Apr 25 17:19:09 pp11 dovecot: auth: Warning:
proxy(redac...@gol.com,xx.xx.xx.xx,26hUEivbfQBlMrMS): DNS lookup for
mb04.dentaku.gol.com took 5.002 s
---
Now this machine at that time was handling a load of about 2 logins per
On 25.4.2013, at 16.39, Lutz Preßler lutz.press...@sernet.de wrote:
on a system with dovecot 2.2 I've got a mailbox containing multiple mails
from a person called Krüger, but From: header encoded differently.
Some are encoded in UTF-8 normalization form decomposed (as used by Mac OSX),
that
Quoting Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi:
On 30.4.2013, at 0.12, Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
This could be changed I guess, but I don't think it's a bug. I
don't see anything in RFC 3501 prohibiting saving empty messages.
Only the MULTIAPPEND RFC says:
A zero-length message literal
It's the inconsistency that bothers me. Plain old APPEND doesn't allow empty
messages but CATENATE does?
Quoting Mike Abbott michael.abb...@apple.com:
It's the inconsistency that bothers me. Plain old APPEND doesn't
allow empty messages but CATENATE does?
I don't recall/see anything in RFC 3501 that prevents a zero-length message:
append = APPEND SP mailbox [SP flag-list] [SP
Hi Buddies,
I have 2 servers running dovecot + postfix for pop/imap users.
The users mailbox are in a Nfs storage.
The load of server is ranging at 3.0 to 15.0.
I really dont know what happened.. I read a lot about tuning of dovecot,
and the changes are applied, how you can see.
The Hardware of
SH On 4/30/2013 1:07 PM, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
On Tuesday, April 30 at 08:04 AM, quoth Gregory Sloop:
Any ideas where to look next, what I might do to force dovecot to
forget message ID's etc - that might force it to read the whole
mailbox file again?
Find the dovecot.index files for that
On 05/02/2013 10:21 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2013-05-02 9:51 AM, Alessio Cecchi ales...@skye.it wrote:
Il 02/05/2013 15:17, Charles Marcus ha scritto:
man mount doesn't show delaylog, nobarrier or noquota as valid mount
options... ?
Yes, they are available on RHEL 6.x.
since 2.6.35,
Dovecot is probably waiting for your storage to respond, you should
probably take a more detailed look at your NFS link and at the
conditions on the NFS server side.
On 05/02/2013 01:00 PM, Rafael VOlpe TI wrote:
Hi Buddies,
I have 2 servers running dovecot + postfix for pop/imap users.
The
Am 02.05.2013 19:54, schrieb Gedalya:
Dovecot is probably waiting for your storage to respond, you should
probably take a more detailed look at your NFS link and at the
conditions on the NFS server side.
On 05/02/2013 01:00 PM, Rafael VOlpe TI wrote:
Hi Buddies,
I have 2 servers running
On 5/1/2013 9:23 PM, Stephan Bosch wrote:
On 5/1/2013 4:58 PM, Daniel Piddock wrote:
On 01/05/13 14:51, Stephan Bosch wrote:
Hi Stephan,
I'm totally sure. The mails end up with two Subject headers so the
addheader line is executing correctly. The bug doesn't even need the
fileinto and stop
Zitat von Charles Marcus cmar...@media-brokers.com:
On 2013-05-02 9:12 AM, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote:
IMHO if you say VM than the filesystem inside the guest doesn't
matter that much.
Well... my understanding is that things can break rather badly if
you use reiserfs
On 2013-05-02 4:18 PM, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote:
For ESXi with its own filesystem (vmfs) it still shouldn't matter that
much. As said the basic task of the Hypervisor is to abstract the
hardware used, so no chance for the guest OS to really optimize for
the hardware used.
Testing URLAUTH in dovecot-2.2.1 plus Timo's recent CATENATE and URLAUTH fixes
eventually trips some assertions. No simple sequence of commands always hits
these; they appear to be timing-dependent.
The first one is:
May 02 17:47:17 imap(pid 50490 user submit): Panic: file imap-client.c: line
Dovecot-2.2.1 plus Timo's recent CATENATE and URLAUTH fixes mishandles literals
after bad URLs. (As before remember that the foobar text below is really
foobarCRLF hence the length of 8. Also, last time some MTA discarded an
important single leading space character in the snippet I quoted so
Dovecot-2.2.1 does not appear to support URLs specified via
non-synchronizing literals
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.2/rev/8e5ff6809d75 should fix this
Looks better, thanks.
CATENATE with no message parts works but, IMO, shouldn't:
Changed: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.2/rev/5e2fa592c268
Confirmed. Thanks.
without having set *mpurl_r to NULL
Right, fixed: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.2/rev/24aa10efe132
That fixes it, thanks, but I wonder if it's incomplete? I notice that these
also sometimes don't set *mpurl_r:
imap_msgpart_url_create()
imap_msgpart_url_parse()
imap_urlauth_fetch()
That
I have a question about using dict and quotas. I want dovecot to send
quota queries to a custom dict server over a socket. I'm doing this
because I can't do group quotas based on domain since a customer can
have each of their users associated with different domains under a
single account.
Hi Marcus!
Should I go with EXT4? Or XFS with just the defaults? Or XFS with one or more
tuned parameters?
...
I'm not using quotas, and understand what inode64 does and am fine with
that, but what I'm still unsure of for a VM environment is the delaylog
and nobarrier options.
I've been
On 5/2/2013 6:16 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
...
I've decided to use mdbox for storage (been using maildir), and will
enable SIS for attachments.
So, anyone (Stan?) have any suggestions? Should I go with EXT4? Or XFS
with just the defaults? Or XFS with one or more tuned parameters?
40 matches
Mail list logo
