+1
On 5/30/13, Edwardo Garcia wrote:
> As oringanal poster, I agree with previouz comment, I too feel thiz
> dovecot responsibile for thiz work handoff, or should delete ability to use
> two host, people twitter I ask all along thought this how it work too!
>
>
> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 6:29 PM,
Am 29.05.2013 22:46, schrieb Andreas Kasenides:
> I should say that other more complicated setups like full blown clusters
> and
> distributed file systems have been rejected due to their complexity (and
> the
> fact we do not have experience with them).
> Our user base is around 3-4K of heavy user
Am 30.05.2013 03:41, schrieb Edwardo Garcia:
> As oringanal poster, I agree with previouz comment, I too feel thiz
> dovecot responsibile for thiz work handoff, or should delete ability to use
> two host, people twitter I ask all along thought this how it work too!
where is the problem, nobody pr
As oringanal poster, I agree with previouz comment, I too feel thiz
dovecot responsibile for thiz work handoff, or should delete ability to use
two host, people twitter I ask all along thought this how it work too!
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 6:29 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> so better remove the opt
I am actually going through the first stages of implementing your
Scenario1.
There is small difference: there will also be 2*Postfix relays also on
the
Dovecot Proxies. This allows placing them in a DMZ such that the "real"
Dovecot/Postfix servers are placed away from the WAN.
After much arguin
[Please keep replies on the list.]
At 6AM +0200 on 29/05/13 you (Yann Shukor) wrote:
>
> Although simpler to set up, I chose to steer clear of the single user
> representing 'all' because I liked the idea of giving users access to
> Usermin allowing them to manage their own password and vacation
Hi
Is dovecot dsync considered an alternative to offlineimap (or others)
when both distant and local are IMAP dovecot servers ?
I used offlineimap for this, but somehow offlineimap got messed up (more
than once, but without me able to explain how it happened). So I'm
considering dsync for this pu
what about using some kind of
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/PostLoginScripting
You got it, a script call for post-login does the trick.
Thank you, Robert.
Sincerely,
Simone.
Am 29.05.2013 14:06, schrieb Paul Lim:
>
> Robert Schetterer sys4.de> writes:
>
>>
>> Am 29.05.2013 06:34, schrieb Paul Lim:
>>> Hi,
>>> I'm getting this error constantly on a couple of folders. No matter
>>> what I do it keeps recurring.
>>>
>>
>> 2.1.7 is old use the recent version then ret
Robert Schetterer sys4.de> writes:
>
> Am 29.05.2013 06:34, schrieb Paul Lim:
> > Hi,
> > I'm getting this error constantly on a couple of folders. No matter
> > what I do it keeps recurring.
> >
>
> 2.1.7 is old use the recent version then retry fixing
>
> Best Regards
> MfG Robert Schet
On 05/29/2013 01:13 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 29.05.2013 12:41, schrieb Torben Schou Jensen:
>> I can read how to setup older version of dovecot with SquirrelMail.
>>
>> They recommend to use uncrypted IMAP when SquirrelMail is on same server.
>>
>> What I would like to support is then imap,
Am 29.05.2013 12:08, schrieb Simone Marx :: Edinet Srl:
> Hi Robert,
> thank you for your answer.
>
> My prevoius mail is based on the wiki page you specified.
>
> Also, the allow_nets parameter seems not to do what I want.
>
> I want to combime remote IP address check (system wide - common for
Am 29.05.2013 06:34, schrieb Paul Lim:
> Hi,
> I'm getting this error constantly on a couple of folders. No matter
> what I do it keeps recurring.
>
2.1.7 is old use the recent version then retry fixing
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
--
[*] sys4 AG
http://sys4.de, +49 (89) 30 90 46 64
Am 29.05.2013 12:41, schrieb Torben Schou Jensen:
> I can read how to setup older version of dovecot with SquirrelMail.
>
> They recommend to use uncrypted IMAP when SquirrelMail is on same server.
>
> What I would like to support is then imap, imaps, pop3 and pop3s.
>
> imaps and pop3s for ext
Recently I have upgraded my server to Debian 7.
Debian have now removed uw-imapd and suggest using dovecot instead.
Debian include dovecot version 2.1.7-7.
On
http://www.debian-administration.org/articles/275
and
http://www.debian-administration.org/articles/200
I can read how to setup older versi
Hi Robert,
thank you for your answer.
My prevoius mail is based on the wiki page you specified.
Also, the allow_nets parameter seems not to do what I want.
I want to combime remote IP address check (system wide - common for all
users)
and single user permission check.
The problem is that I w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 29 May 2013, Arun Gupta wrote:
Dear Steffen I search about "slurp" plugin but didn't get it if possible
kindly provde me the doc, link etc for the same.
Um, sorry, "slurp" is the term UW-Imap uses, in Dovecot:
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Plu
Hi,
I'm getting this error constantly on a couple of folders. No matter
what I do it keeps recurring.
--
2013-05-29 14:15:03
imap(nj@***.com.au): Error: Cached message size smaller than expected
(2551 < 8192) 2013-05-29 14:15:03 imap(nj@***.com.au): Error: Maildir
filename has wrong S value, r
On 29.5.2013, at 10.54, Oli Schacher wrote:
> With the current dovecot hg we're getting dsync replication errors
> "Panic: Unknown key: send_mail_requests" followed by a crash. This
> seems to have been introduced somewhere around
> http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.2/rev/4883a8e1db13
Thanks, fixe
Hi,
Thanks for replying...
Dear Steffen I search about "slurp" plugin but didn't get it if possible
kindly provde me the doc, link etc for the same.
Regards,
Arun Gupta
On Tue, 28 May 2013, Arun Gupta wrote:
I configured imap quota on dovecot-2.0 with backend Maildir++, after
exceeding u
Am 29.05.2013 10:37, schrieb Simone Marx :: Edinet Srl:
> Hi,
> I'm trying to config dovecot to enable IMAP protocol only for certain
> IPs and users.
> The logical steps I've followed are:
> 1. If a user is trying to login from an IP that I've authorized ( listed
> in a file) the request is author
Hi,
I'm trying to config dovecot to enable IMAP protocol only for certain
IPs and users.
The logical steps I've followed are:
1. If a user is trying to login from an IP that I've authorized (
listed in a file) the request is authorized.
2. If not, if the user is listed in a second file the requ
so better remove the option to specify more than one host
instead let people run over years in troubles until they
find out that a logical behavior like for postfix is not
given for dovecot's mysql-connections - yes i was one of
the who thought "hey both works the same way" until
i realized that do
Hi Timo
With the current dovecot hg we're getting dsync replication errors
"Panic: Unknown key: send_mail_requests" followed by a crash. This
seems to have been introduced somewhere around
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.2/rev/4883a8e1db13
Log output from latest hg, 2.2.2 (e7c474011934+):
May 2
Respectfully, I would disagree, if dovecot offers the capability to use
two host='s then you should be able to configure the order, remember,
earlier dovecot did this but you claimed it was broken shouldnt have and
fixed it, which is why not only myself but another at the time suggested
when you we
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 28 May 2013, MP Netsai wrote:
increase logging, see http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Logging
then check out the logs and - if required still, because Dovecot's log
message usually speak an understandable tongue - post the logs along.
- --
Steffen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 28 May 2013, Romer Ventura wrote:
So I am currently running dovecot 1.2.11 on Debian 5 for our production
email systems. We just deployed some new Debian 7 servers and we will be
upgrading to the latest dovecot version. I've been reading the
27 matches
Mail list logo
