On 04/08/2014 05:38 PM, The Doctor wrote:
Is their a way in the config file to not lock
POP3 sessions in dovecot for only 1 user?
See the "Overriding settings" section:
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/UserDatabase/ExtraFields
Is their a way in the config file to not lock
POP3 sessions in dovecot for only 1 user?
--
Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
God,Queen and country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
http://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k Look at P
Be aware that your private key might already have leaked without any
notice. So your best bet is to withdraw your certificates and renew
all keys/certificates on the affected machines.
Yes, I suppose by now everybody has read the general hints on
heartbleed.com ; it might even be that previous
Am 08.04.2014 21:38, schrieb lst_ho...@kwsoft.de:
> Zitat von Jakob Curdes :
>
>> Am 08.04.2014 19:00, schrieb John Rowe:
>>> Do we know if dovecot is vulnerable to the heartbleed SSL problem?
>>>
>>> I'm running dovecot-2.0.9 and openssl-1.01, the latter being
>>> intrinsically vulnerable. An o
Zitat von Jakob Curdes :
Am 08.04.2014 19:00, schrieb John Rowe:
Do we know if dovecot is vulnerable to the heartbleed SSL problem?
I'm running dovecot-2.0.9 and openssl-1.01, the latter being
intrinsically vulnerable. An on-line tool says that my machine is not
affected on port 993 but it wo
Am 08.04.2014 19:00, schrieb John Rowe:
Do we know if dovecot is vulnerable to the heartbleed SSL problem?
I'm running dovecot-2.0.9 and openssl-1.01, the latter being
intrinsically vulnerable. An on-line tool says that my machine is not
affected on port 993 but it would be nice to know for sur
* John Rowe :
> Do we know if dovecot is vulnerable to the heartbleed SSL problem?
ANY application using the affected OpenSSL versions is vulnerable. That
includes dovecot.
> I'm running dovecot-2.0.9 and openssl-1.01, the latter being
> intrinsically vulnerable. An on-line tool says that my mach
Do we know if dovecot is vulnerable to the heartbleed SSL problem?
I'm running dovecot-2.0.9 and openssl-1.01, the latter being
intrinsically vulnerable. An on-line tool says that my machine is not
affected on port 993 but it would be nice to know for sure if we were
vulnerable for a while. (Natur
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 8 Apr 2014, Deeztek Support wrote:
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 05:36:51 -0400
From: Deeztek Support
Reply-To: Dovecot Mailing List
To: dovecot@dovecot.org
Subject: Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot LDAP issue
On 4/8/2014 2:18 AM, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
The
On 8/4/2014 4:47 μμ, Teemu Huovila wrote:
I cant find any errors, but I might be missing something obvious. I only have a
few suggestions for things to check.
1) You listed the config for one host (vmail i assume). Is the configuration
similar on the vmail1 side? Especially, can the
command d
Hi,
the Dovecot Director determines the backend host in some way by hashing the
username:
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Director
For normal logins usern...@example.org, the director always gets the same hash
for the same username and ensures that the login is always proxied to the same
backend.
B
On 04/08/2014 03:00 PM, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
> Neither using replication nor using dsync from CLI leads to subfolders
> getting replicated, as I have explained. As an example,
> if a user creates subfolder "boxtest" e.g. under Inbox on either side, it
> never gets created on the other side.
I ca
Hi,
In article <5343e1b5.1070...@skye.it>,
Alessio Cecchi wrote:
> Try with:
>
> doveadm search -u andy mailbox "News Reports" before 90d
>
> there is a difference between savedbefore and before, with "search"
> instead of "expunge" you can see the result witout delete you email.
Than
Hello,
I am running dovecot 2.2.12
Current mail storage is sdbox and I am trying to compress all emails,
which works fine, except for a few old mailboxes.
If I run the following dsync command
"dsync -u flea -o "mail_plugins=zlib" mirror maildir:~/ndbox"
It fails with:
dsync(flea): Error: Expo
On 4/8/2014 6:12 AM, Mihai Badici wrote:
As I already said, authentication is one thing and delivery is other thing.
This filter receive probably different variable as %u when deliver ( posibly the
mail address or the user part from it, depending on your master.cf .
You can use an | in the ldap
On 8/4/2014 12:38 μμ, Teemu Huovila wrote:
3) dsync replication / doveadm sync not working as expected.
These came in pretty late in the thread and I did not get a full picture of
what kind of setups and parameters were used. I
suspect these might be a configuration issue. I think trying with d
Il 08/04/2014 12:47, Andy Hawkins ha scritto:
Hi,
I'm a recent convert to dovecot, and in general it is all working fine.
However, I have a number of cron jobs set up to purge old messages from
mailboxes. These don't seem to be doing what I would expect.
Is there any way of debugging this proc
Hi,
I'm a recent convert to dovecot, and in general it is all working fine.
However, I have a number of cron jobs set up to purge old messages from
mailboxes. These don't seem to be doing what I would expect.
Is there any way of debugging this process? Some way of seeing what messages
it's check
On Tuesday 08 April 2014 05:36:51 Deeztek Support wrote:
> On 4/8/2014 2:18 AM, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
> > The primary question is: Does
> >
> > ldapsearch -H ldap://server.domain.tld:389 \
> >
> > -b dc=domain,dc=tld -D ... -W \
> > '(&(userPrincipalName=<>)(objectClass=person)(!(userAccount
Hello
Many different dsync issues have come up in this thread. Ill try to answer them
as best as I can.
1) dsync backup -R
The conclusion reached in the thread was correct. Instead of the backup option,
doveadm import would be better suited for
merging old mails into an existing mailbox.
2) Ma
On 4/8/2014 2:18 AM, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
The primary question is: Does
ldapsearch -H ldap://server.domain.tld:389 \
-b dc=domain,dc=tld -D ... -W \
'(&(userPrincipalName=<>)(objectClass=person)(!(userAccountControl:1.2.840.113556.1.4.803:=2)))'
return the user?
yes it does. The authen
Hi,
today I had the same problem with 2.2.12 on debian squeeze.
Here comes the log:
...
Apr 8 08:40:45 mailstoreul dovecot: imap(u...@domain.net pid:3618
session:<9cAjIG724wDD/uGI>): Panic: file mail-index-map.c: line 547
(mail_index_map_lookup_seq_range): assertion failed: (first_uid > 0)
Apr
22 matches
Mail list logo
