Re: 2.3.11.3 on 32bit platforms

> On 22/08/2020 09:16 Peter Ajamian wrote: > > > On 18/08/20 2:15 pm, Peter wrote: > > I'm getting the same issue on a CentOS 6 i386 build: > > > > test-mech.c:371: Assert(#1) failed: strcmp(test_case->username,username) > >     "testuser" != NULL > > test-mech.c:380: Assert(#1) failed:

Re: 2.3.11.3 on 32bit platforms

On 18/08/20 2:15 pm, Peter wrote: I'm getting the same issue on a CentOS 6 i386 build: test-mech.c:371: Assert(#1) failed: strcmp(test_case->username,username)     "testuser" != NULL test-mech.c:380: Assert(#1) failed: request->failed == FALSE auth mech APOP 2/84 ...

Metric label values truncated when using OpenMetrics endpoint

Hi, Recently we upgraded to Dovecot 2.3.11.3 and configured an example metric like this: metric imap_command { event_name = imap_command_finished group_by = cmd_name tagged_reply_state user remote_ip } And enabled the OpenMetrics listener like this: service stats { inet_listener http {

Re: Dovecot on Ubuntu 20.04

On 21/08/2020 19.28, spamv...@googlemail.com wrote: > I'm on Ubuntu 18.04 and using the latest packages from repo.dovecot.com > > > But these are only available for bionic, not focal. > So I'm not sure if the bionic packages are working under focal. I don't know if thes

Re: RHEL7/CentOS7 RPM of dovecot 2.3.11.3-3 seems to have dropped tcpwrap support

On 22/08/20 2:45 am, Gerald Galster wrote: So is el8 truly incompatible with tcpwrap? Or is it just too much effort to continue suport for every feature that was ever in the system? https://access.redhat.com/solutions/3906701 "The TCP Wrappers package has been deprecated in RHEL 7 and therefo

Re: [EXT] Re: dovecot-SASL for Postfix: EXTERNAL does not work.

(I removed Wietse Venema from Cc:.) Aki Tuomi wrote in <1972528099.4900.1598022980...@appsuite-dev-gw1.open-xchange.com>: ... |Sorry for duplicate mail, I accidentically pressed too many keys... *sigh* Sure. |Anyways, I'm not sure if you understood my point, I ment, have you \ |tried EXTER

Re: Dovecot on Ubuntu 20.04

packages from repo.dovecot. org ;) Am Fr., 21. Aug. 2020 um 13:28 Uhr schrieb : > Hi, > > sorry I should be more specific. > I'm on Ubuntu 18.04 and using the latest packages from repo.dovecot.com > > But these are only available for bionic, not focal. > So I'm not sure

Re: Dovecot on Ubuntu 20.04

Hi, sorry I should be more specific. I'm on Ubuntu 18.04 and using the latest packages from repo.dovecot.com But these are only available for bionic, not focal. So I'm not sure if the bionic packages are working under focal. I did not notice that ubuntu original packages are on 2.3.7 now. So wor

Re: [EXT] Re: dovecot-SASL for Postfix: EXTERNAL does not work.

Just another reminder.. https://github.com/dovecot/core/pull/86 This will allow plugins to make 'capability' advertisements more dynamic.. On 2020-08-21 7:56 a.m., Steffen Nurpmeso wrote: Aki Tuomi wrote in <1907575568.4364.1597984769...@appsuite-dev-gw1.open-xchange.com>: |> On 21/08/2020

Re: [EXT] Re: dovecot-SASL for Postfix: EXTERNAL does not work.

> On 21/08/2020 17:56 Steffen Nurpmeso wrote: > > > Aki Tuomi wrote in > <1907575568.4364.1597984769...@appsuite-dev-gw1.open-xchange.com>: > |> On 21/08/2020 02:17 Steffen Nurpmeso wrote: > ... > |> Wietse Venema wrote in > |><4bxstk189nzj...@spike.porcupine.org>: > |>... >

Re: [EXT] Re: dovecot-SASL for Postfix: EXTERNAL does not work.

> On 21/08/2020 17:56 Steffen Nurpmeso wrote: > > > Aki Tuomi wrote in > <1907575568.4364.1597984769...@appsuite-dev-gw1.open-xchange.com>: > |> On 21/08/2020 02:17 Steffen Nurpmeso wrote: > ... > |> Wietse Venema wrote in > |><4bxstk189nzj...@spike.porcupine.org>: > |>... >

Re: [EXT] Re: dovecot-SASL for Postfix: EXTERNAL does not work.

Aki Tuomi wrote in <1907575568.4364.1597984769...@appsuite-dev-gw1.open-xchange.com>: |> On 21/08/2020 02:17 Steffen Nurpmeso wrote: ... |> Wietse Venema wrote in |><4bxstk189nzj...@spike.porcupine.org>: |>... |>|Steffen Nurpmeso: |>... |>|> until SASL says it is done?!. Ho

zlib errors after upgrading from 2.3.10.1 to 2.3.11.3

I get ZLIB Errors after dovecot upgrade from 2.3.10.1 to 2.3.11.3 Thunderbird reports some error when try to save/open a bigger attachment. Aug 21 15:27:34 lxc-imap dovecot: imap(acsida)<63870>: Error: Mailbox Sent: UID=40826: read(zlib(/home/vmail/virtualmailboxes/acsida/storage/m.2409)) fai

Re: RHEL7/CentOS7 RPM of dovecot 2.3.11.3-3 seems to have dropped tcpwrap support

At a guess it was removed from the spec for el8 (which does not support tcpwrap) and somehow got removed from el7 by accident. The ghettoforge dovecot23 packages have tcpwrap support for el7: > > So is el8 truly incompatible with tcpwrap? Or is it just too much > effort to contin

Re: Adjusting logging with the "remote" syntax

I wanted to follow up on this message. Is there any way to disable info logging for when the ‘remote’ is localhost? > On Aug 12, 2020, at 12:48 PM, Jason Young wrote: > > According to the docs, we can use ‘local’ and ‘remote’ blocks to change > configuration directives. > > In my current

Re: RHEL7/CentOS7 RPM of dovecot 2.3.11.3-3 seems to have dropped tcpwrap support

On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 06:02:49PM +1200, Peter wrote: > On 21/08/20 5:55 pm, Aki Tuomi wrote: > > > At a guess it was removed from the spec for el8 (which does not support > > > tcpwrap) and somehow got removed from el7 by accident. The ghettoforge > > > dovecot23 packages have tcpwrap support fo

Re: [EXT] Re: dovecot-SASL for Postfix: EXTERNAL does not work.

> On 21/08/2020 02:17 Steffen Nurpmeso wrote: > > > Hello and good evening. > > Sorry for responding so late, it is midsummer and i spend as much > time as possible on the outside (bicycle, mostly). (Just one more > day, then 10 degrees colder!!) > > I Cc: Wietse Venema, because i quote a

Re: OT: SASL questions

On 21/08/20 7:15 pm, @lbutlr wrote: > On 21 Aug 2020, at 01:05, Richard Hector wrote: >> Is that a standard interface? ie can a client like postfix talk to >> either dovecot or cyrus without knowing the difference? > > Yes. Postfix does not care, though I find it is easier to setup and more > re

Re: OT: SASL questions

On 21 Aug 2020, at 01:05, Richard Hector wrote: > Is that a standard interface? ie can a client like postfix talk to > either dovecot or cyrus without knowing the difference? Yes. Postfix does not care, though I find it is easier to setup and more reliable to use dovecot (I've used both, YMMV).

OT: SASL questions

Hi all, Apologies for the somewhat off-topic questions - I'm trying to get my head around SASL, and what it is/does. I can see that a (SMTP, IMAP etc) server can offer various authentication methods, which are pre-defined and which the client can choose from. SASL then seems to define how those w