Le 19/04/2021 à 09:01, Aki Tuomi a écrit :
>> On 17/04/2021 23:07 Michael Grant wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 04:45:36PM -0400, Michael Grant wrote:
>>> Every few days, my mailbox seizes up. No mail come in to my imap clients.
>>>
>>> I'm getting these errors over and over with my
Le 16/03/2021 à 12:47, Eirik Rye a écrit :
>
>
> On 03/15/2021 8:43 PM, Paterakis E. Ioannis wrote:
>> It's not keepalived's work to tell the directors which backend is
>> up/down. You can use poolmon for that. keepalived will make sure the
>> floating ip will always be assigned on an alive
Le 20/06/2019 à 12:25, @lbutlr via dovecot a écrit :
> On 20 Jun 2019, at 04:14, Jorge Bastos via dovecot
> wrote:
>> I don't desagree with your vision, but if the use of CRAM- has to use
>> plaint text password's on the server there's a dark side, or there's a
>> CRAM-XXX that can use
Le 20/06/2019 à 11:59, @lbutlr via dovecot a écrit :
> On 20 Jun 2019, at 02:53, FUSTE Emmanuel via dovecot
> wrote:
>> There is plenty of context where TLS is not possible/desirable.
> I’d say that is terrible advice. There are no reasonable contexts where is it
> is accep
Hello,
The world is not black or white.
Yes CRAM-MD5 is old and his successor SCRAM-XX is not widely
available/implemented which is sad.
For your need, use TLS and forget about it.
Thunderbird is conservative. If you don't configure TLS or TLS is not
available, it try to use something that
Hello,
coredump found after a force-resync and a replicate
Emmanuel.
(dovecot-ee 2.2.30.2-1)
[New LWP 17168]
Core was generated by `dovecot/doveadm-server'.
Program terminated with signal SIGABRT, Aborted.
#0 0x7fa334127c37 in __GI_raise (sig=sig@entry=6) at
Le 30/05/2017 à 20:16, Timo Sirainen a écrit :
> https://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.30.tar.gz
> https://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.30.tar.gz.sig
>
> * auth: Use timing safe comparisons for everything related to
> passwords. It's unlikely that these could have been used
Le 10/12/2015 08:56, Timo Sirainen a écrit :
> On 10 Dec 2015, at 06:53, deoren wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've been using the Dovecot EE packages for Ubuntu for some time now and
>> just recently started getting 404 errors. Have those packages been
>> discontinued or
any fixes related to dsync+imapc, which were found while
> migrating several million users from GMail. I'm not aware of any problems
> with it now. Also even before v2.2.19 dsync+imapc has been used to
> successfully do many large migrations.
>
>> On 26 Nov 2015, at 17:49, FUSTE
Hello,
Because it did not work ?
In a similar situation, we where forced to use isync/mbsync in imap to
imap mode because dsync did not work.
It was reported here more than a year ago (May 2014).
Time to time, I see the same report from other trying to use dsync to do
a migration to dovecot.
imapc/dsync would have been better.
Emmanuel.
Le 26/11/2015 15:24, Sami Ketola a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I think you tried to read cyrus mails folders directly. I was talking about
> fething mails from cyrus over imapc connection.
>
> Sami
>
>> On 26 Nov 2015, at 15:36,
Le 16/02/2015 20:40, Casey Stone a écrit :
On Feb 13, 2015, at 3:42 PM, FUSTE Emmanuel emmanuel.fu...@thalesgroup.com
wrote:
Le 13/02/2015 16:19, Casey Stone a écrit :
On Feb 5, 2015, at 10:39 PM, Casey Stone tcst...@caseystone.com wrote:
Hello:
I've been looking forward to getting my
Le 13/02/2015 16:19, Casey Stone a écrit :
On Feb 5, 2015, at 10:39 PM, Casey Stone tcst...@caseystone.com wrote:
Hello:
I've been looking forward to getting my mail server up to Dovecot 2.2+ to be
able to use the sync mechanism. I run my own mail server just for myself,
with a few
Le 07/05/2014 17:38, Emmanuel Fusté a écrit :
Hello,
After going crazy building a dovecot cluster, I finally see the light ;-))
But some things are strange and could probably be fixed/enhanced.
First :
I follow the wiki doc, setting global doveadm_port.
Things did not work, I've got:
Hello,
Is there any way to limit the use of the redirect action (local user
only or silent ignore) as provisioned by the RFC in the Pigeonhole
implementation ?
The only way I found for the moment is to completely disable the
fileinto extension which hardly beat the users experience.
redirect
Le 21/05/2014 17:49, Daniel Parthey a écrit :
Hi Emmanuel
Am 21.05.2014 16:04, schrieb FUSTE Emmanuel:
Is there any way to limit the use of the redirect action (local user
only or silent ignore) as provisioned by the RFC in the Pigeonhole
implementation?
The only way I found for the moment
16 matches
Mail list logo