On 18/04/2012 17:45, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 18.4.2012, at 14.36, John Robinson wrote:
I'd like to change the on-disk layout for my mboxes from being
~/mail/foo/bar
to
~/mail/foo.bar
so that I can have folders containing both messages and subfolders, without
having subfolders begi
I'd like to change the on-disk layout for my mboxes from being
~/mail/foo/bar
to
~/mail/foo.bar
so that I can have folders containing both messages and subfolders,
without having subfolders beginning with . and then having to do all the
other fiddling with locations of index files etc. that
On 12/07/2007 23:19, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Thu, 2007-07-12 at 15:12 +0100, Richard Ellis wrote:
auth default:
passdb:
driver: pam
userdb:
driver: passwd
You have no auth settings that change the username, so it must be
Squirrelmail that adds it.
I suspect the vlogin plugin. Quo
On 11/05/2007 15:57, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Fri, 2007-04-20 at 14:00 +0100, John Robinson wrote:
I'm trying to add "virtual" mailboxes to a system. Real users with
different uids own domains. Each domain has a passwd-file passdb. I
don't want to use this passwd-file for t
On 02/05/2007 12:13, Eric wrote:
Dear Dovecot experts,
I have a small home server debian based, with postfix/dovecot/squirrelmail
installed locally and working. Dovecot is used non-secured (no imaps) but
only on the 192.168.0.100 address (address of the server on the local
network). I want to use
I'm trying to add "virtual" mailboxes to a system. Real users with
different uids own domains. Each domain has a passwd-file passdb. I
don't want to use this passwd-file for the userdb, because I want to fix
the home, mail and uid/gid settings. Can I use the static userdb in a
less static manne
On 09/04/2007 03:24, Sean Kamath wrote:
On Apr 8, 2007, at 2:20 PM, Bill Cole wrote:
It is important for people to understand how much simpler it is now to
run basically functional and non-abusive NTP than it was even 5 years
ago. The work put into making pool.ntp.org usable has essentially
e
On 10/03/2007 14:15, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Sun, 2007-02-18 at 15:12 +, John Robinson wrote:
Otherwise looks ok. But I think I'll add this to CVS HEAD and not v1.0.
I'm at least trying to keep a feature freeze. :)
Oh go on, it's not likely to hurt any existing installatio
On 03/04/2007 17:45, Steve Mulligan wrote:
Timo Sirainen wrote:
I hope you've never actually tried to use this "ssl_listen = *:110"
setting? pop3s is in port 995.
Sadly yes, for now. I'm the only one using the pop server and I don't
have control over opening my own ports to the outside world
On 30/03/2007 22:27, Tom Bombadil wrote:
Hi all...
The prefetch entry in the wiki says:
"If you're using Dovecot's local delivery agent, you'll still need a
valid userdb which it can use to locate the users. You can do this by
adding a normal sql/ldap userdb after userdb prefetch."
(http://wi
On 29/03/2007 22:27, Axel Thimm wrote:
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 09:43:48PM +0100, John Robinson wrote:
[...] If you use ATrpms packages, you
ought to have read the support details (i.e. testing latest software,
works for Axel, don't complain to him).
No, please do complain to Axe
On 29/03/2007 03:41, Eric Rostetter wrote:
Quoting John Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 28/03/2007 19:39, Eric Rostetter wrote:
People running Fedora Core run 0.99, and they do not know it isn't
production
(since it comes with FC, which they don't know isn't production)
On 29/03/2007 15:19, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007, Timo Sirainen wrote:
xfs is a lot slower than ext3 with maildir at least in my tests.
Doh, hm, I'm back to ext3 then.
When Ext3 opens a directory with many many files, the whole system slows
down, an user managed to issue a trem
On 28/03/2007 19:39, Eric Rostetter wrote:
People running Fedora Core run 0.99, and they do not know it isn't
production
(since it comes with FC, which they don't know isn't production).
They ought to; FC in its entirety is devel for RHEL, and this is
prominently pointed out all over the F we
On 28/03/2007 17:32, Taras Savchuk wrote:
In FreeBSD pam_group does exactly what I want:
Oh, sorry, didn't know you were on *BSD but I suppose I shouldn't have
assumed Linux. In Linux-PAM, pam_wheel's documentation is very similar
to your pam_group, with the addition of an option:
use_uid
On 28/03/2007 16:52, Taras Savchuk wrote:
Pam auth don't work when I add pam_group:
pam_group grants membership to groups, it can't be used to authenticate.
Use pam_wheel or pam_succeed_if, and see
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/libs/pam/Linux-PAM-html/Linux-PAM_SAG.html
Cheers,
John.
On 28/03/2007 12:10, Taras Savchuk wrote:
I'm just finished FreeBSD/AD integration via Kerberos/LDAP and now I can
manage unix users/groups from AD. I want to grant access to IMAP based
on user membership in certain group. Is it possible? Can you give me
some hints?
My quick thought is that t
On 28/03/2007 01:46, Timo Sirainen wrote:
After v1.0 is released, I can finally get back to sane version numbers.
But any comments on which one is better:
a) Postfix-style: "1.1.UNSTABLE.MMDD" -> 1.1.0 (stable)
b) Odd-even numbering: 1.1.x (unstable) -> 1.2.0 (stable)
With a) style the rel
On 25/03/2007 15:12, Timo Sirainen wrote:
I guess this duplicate checking could be done, but I wouldn't want it
enabled by default.
You've got to be careful anyway, these so-called duplicates often come
via different routes (e.g. directly and via a mailing list), may have
been processed diffe
On 25/03/2007 13:39, Johannes Berg wrote:
On Sun, 2007-03-25 at 14:27 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
[...]
However, one thing I'm not clear on is how to prevent that user from
creating new folders.
[...]
Oh, I found a solution already. Make the maildir read-only and put
CONTROL/INDEX elsewhere i
On 23/03/2007 21:21, John Peacock wrote:
This is the entire message:
=
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Is this really it? There's no - in this header.
Cheers,
John.
On 23/03/2007 14:11, funkypunky drunky wrote:
[...]
login_greeting = Microsoft Exchange POP3 server version 5.5.2653.23 ready
[...]
Then i start dovecot. It returns an error.
What do you expect, if you tell it to behave like Exchange?
Cheers,
John.
On 21/03/2007 19:35, John Andrea wrote:
As others mentioned, using ntpd avoids this problem entirely.
Not entirely. If you need to restart ntpd, the time can jump when
catching up with 'step-tickers'.
Which is a good reason for starting ntpd before other network services,
because once it's
On 16/03/2007 19:06, Alex Boster wrote:
Does anyone have a quick recipe for how to do the filtering?
We are on CentOS 4 using a near default setup...
Does that mean dovecot 0.99? If so you ought to build or download
something more recent (ready-made latest is available from atrpms.net)
The
On 18/03/2007 15:51, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Sat, 2007-03-17 at 01:39 +0100, Václav Haisman wrote:
[...]
uint32_t flags:8;
uint32_t uid_broken:1;
uint32_t expunged:1;
uint32_t pseudo:1;
Right, I didn't think of that. But that feels a bit ugly :) I don't
think it saves much memory anyway, so I
25 matches
Mail list logo
