A.L.E.C a...@alec.pl writes:
On 04.08.2010 12:25, Craig Whitmore wrote:
Looking at the RFC.. and if dovecot is doing this then its going against
the RFC and doing it wrong. As it says This listing of capabilities is
not dependent upon connection state or user.
Leander S. leander.schae...@googlemail.com writes:
server [~]# cat /etc/ssl/mail/mail.key
-BEGIN RSA PRIVATE KEY-
[...]
Hmm, you have apparently posted your private key to a public maillist.
You might want to generate a new key and cert.
Rick Romero r...@havokmon.com writes:
Yeah.. procmail filter to modify the subject would satisfy me.
I'm by no means a procmail expert, but this seems to work (though
[Dovecot] gets put before the Re:)
:0 fhw
* ^List-Id:.*Dovecot Mailing List
{
:0 fhw
* ^Subject:\/.*
| formail -I
Noel Butler noel.but...@ausics.net writes:
On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 01:41 -0400, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Dovecot auth isn't case-insensitive. But MySQL is, and I guess you're
using it? There are several different ways around it.
Which is not a problem since most (all) MTA's normally treat
Stephan Bosch step...@rename-it.nl writes:
Yes, your second rule is an elsif, meaning that it is only executed when
the first if-condition is not 'true'. Since that first rule has a forced
true' result, the second rule is absolutely never executed. You script
should be:
require
Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi writes:
Why does Dovecot add \Seen flag for mails that have been RETRed? Does
anyone really want to use this feature? I can't remember why I
implemented it originally, perhaps it was just because other servers do
that too. I'm thinking about at least changing
Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi writes:
I do kind of like that idea, but I don't really se how it would be
practical here, especially if high performance is wanted.
I don't really see why a priori it would be any less performant than any
other particular RPC mechanism.
1. I'm not implementing
Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi writes:
The big problem is what the protocol should be. Use some existing RPC
protocol? It should be something extensible so that a plugin in imap
process can talk to a plugin in storage process, without the base
processes knowing anything about the details (e.g.
Richard Hobbs richard.ho...@crl.toshiba.co.uk writes:
19. Once everything is working perfectly, send an email to the entire
company instructing them what to do after the outage and arrange an
outage and do the following steps as soon as the outage begins:
a. Unplug DMZ switch from
Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi writes:
On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 15:31 +0100, Jahnke-Zumbusch, Dirk wrote:
1. I am puzzled about the credentials i...@my.host.name being obtained;
shouldn't this be
something like imap/my.host.n...@my.realm ?
I don't know anything about Kerberos.
I suspect the
CW == Carlos Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
CW This folder shows up as a sub folder to his Inbox on his
CW Thunderbird client and I tried using the cp command to move this
CW over to my Maildir/ directory on the same server and when I launch
CW Thunderbird, that folder is not
EK == Eduardo M KALINOWSKI [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
EK Try fileinto Lists.NCCC, the . is the default folder
EK separator.
EK It should be possible to change it to a / with namespaces, but
EK it would make a cosmetic change, and judging by other posts in the
EK list, it
AM == Adam McDougall [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
AM I have been using it for a few weeks and it has been working well,
AM but yesterday I noticed it also seems to be escaping the \
AM (backslash) character in folder names.
listescape has to escape '\' so that applications of
GE == Grant Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
GE When using maildir storage, is there any way to use something
GE besides . as the folder separator?
Please note that the following relates to dovecot 1.0. I've not looked to
see if 1.1 behaves differently.
Yes you can use a namespace
NS == Nikolay Shopik [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
NS I forgot to add some MUA don't like be subscribed to folders which
NS doesn't exist so you should probably aware of this too in case
NS such MUA used in your environment .
While it doesn't surprise me that there may well be MUAs
TS == Timo Sirainen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
TS I'm beginning to think that maybe something more generic is
TS needed, such as:
TS auth default {
TS ..
TS environment {
TS krb5_ktname = ..
TS krb5ccname = ...
TS who_knows_what_else_in_future = ..
M == Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
M What if the script only touched the dovecot.index if it exists?
M That would likely not be too difficult to test for with shell
M script.
Might be tricky to do in shell without a race. On the other hand maybe a
race in this case is not
BH == Benjamin R Haskell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Can I just touch the dovecot.index instead?
BH Maybe. Not sure what environment variable holds its location,
BH though. And I'm not 100% sure it always exists or whether you'd
BH have to special-case the first-time login.
LS == Lars Stavholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
LS For example:
LS /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf:
LS ...
LS protocol lda {
LS ...
LS sieve_global_path = /etc/dovecot/sieve/
LS ...
LS }
LS /etc/dovecot/global:
LS if header :contains X-Spam-Flag YES {
Admittedly not a common situation but:
MAIL=maildir:~/tmp/dovecot/Maildir ./src/imap/imap
* PREAUTH [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 SASL-IR SORT THREAD=REFERENCES MULTIAPPEND
UNSELECT LITERAL+ IDLE CHILDREN NAMESPACE LOGIN-REFERRALS] Logged in as pod
01 LIST *
* LIST (\HasNoChildren) . INBOX
01 OK List
KA == Ken A [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
KA Tried with -e, but sendmail says EX_NOPERM is a permanent error,
KA and issues it's own DSN immediately. dsn=5.0.0, stat=Insufficient
KA permission. :-(
Not unexpected. I assumed (but neglected to express the assumption :) one
could
DM == Daniel L Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
DM I did make a discovery - hardcoding the sieve path, without
DM variables, e.g. sieve = /var/mail/amfes.com/dmiller/sieve -
DM worked!
DM Is there a problem using the domain / user variables in the
DM configuration file?
pod == pod [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
pod I'd like to flag a problem we are observing that looks like it is
pod caused by the listescape-plugin.c. I realize that this plugin is
pod not part of the standard Dovecot 1.0 distribution but I would
pod appreciate any insights
LIST *
* LIST (\HasNoChildren) / a/b
* LIST (\HasNoChildren) / c
* LIST (\HasNoChildren) / INBOX
06 OK List completed.
07 LOGOUT
* BYE Logging out
07 OK Logout completed.
Seemingly the only relevant log entry is
@400046d70d8f1f72b66c dovecot: Error: IMAP(pod):
rename(/srv/mail/home/test0
TS == Timo Sirainen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
TS Well, doing it only if it's the first header would make it better.
Sure, I considered that. I note though that the save_header_callback()
from mbox-save.c also does not make this distinction and will strip a
^From anywhere in the headers so
I attach a patch that adds some informational logging for the vacation
outcome in a similar style as the 'notify', 'redirect' and 'reject' cases.
I considered adding logging for the not-willing-to-respond case since I
think that would greatly assist testing/debugging vacation responses, but
SG == Sebastian Ganschow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
SG Even if I set global_script_dir = /var/vmail dovecot won't use
SG the global filter.
shell$ cd dovecot-sieve-1.0.2
shell$ find . -type f -name \*.[ch] -print0 | xargs -0 grep -i -e global_script
./src/cmusieve-plugin.c:
I'd like to put forward the following patch for dovecot-sieve.
Essentially this just merges in some changes made in CMU sieve 2.3.8 and
as such brings the behaviour more in line with RFC 3834 Recommendations
for Automatic Responses to Electronic Mail:
- fixes erroneous sender -request substring
TS == Timo Sirainen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
TS It's mostly there just to make sure that ~/ or ~user/ can't be
TS used to open mailboxes where you weren't supposed to have access
TS to. I didn't think anyone would really want to have mailboxes
TS beginning with ~. Do you really
TS == Timo Sirainen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
TS How about if listescape plugin escaped it? That would make it
TS possible to use them but still safe against accidental problems.
Yes, I think that would work fine at least for my particular purposes
since we'll almost certainly be
ed == Ed Lucero [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
ed It creates two binaries sievec and sieved. [...]
- sievec is a standalone bytecode compiler
- sieved is a standalone bytecode de-compiler
You can use them to verify that .dovecot.sieve and .dovecot.sievec are
being updated correctly by the
31 matches
Mail list logo
